Abstract
In George Méliès’s silent French fantasy film of 1902 L’homme à la tête en caoutchouc (The man with the rubber head), a scientist, played by Méliès, removes a severed head from a box and places it on a table (Illustration 5).1 The head is alive; it speaks and looks around the room anxiously. The scientist removes his head scarf: it is George Méliès. Through a series of gestures, he demonstrates that his head is identical to that on the table. Using a pair of bellows, the scientist inflates and then shrinks the head, to the head’s apparent horror. Assuming control of the experiment, Méliès’s assistant gets carried away and over-inflates the head until it explodes in a puff of smoke. Furious, Méliès kicks his incompetent assistant out of the room before bursting into tears.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
L’homme à la tête en caoutchouc (George Méliès, 1902); Elizabeth Ezra, George Méliès: The Birth of the Auteur (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000)
Ian Christie, The Last Machine: Early Cinema and the Birth of the Modern World (London: BFI, 1984)
John Frazer, Artificially Arranged Scenes: The Films of George Méliès (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1979)
Pierre Jenn, George Méliès Cinéaste (Paris: Albatros, 1984).
Richard Rickitt, Special Effects (London: Aurum, 2006), p. 14.
Noël Burch, The Life to Those Shadows (trans. Ben Brewster) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), p. 26.
George Demeny, ‘Les Photographie parlantes’, La Nature, 20ème année no. 985, 16 April 1892, p. 315, cited in George Sadoul, L’Invention du Cinéma 1832–1897 (Paris: Denoël, 1973), pp. 169–70.
George Pearson, Flashback: Autobiography of a British Film-maker (London: Allen & Unwin, 1957), p. 14
Jean Renoir, My Life and My Films (London: Collins, 1974), pp. 17–18.
R. A. Foakes (ed.), Henslowe’s Diary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 291–4.
George Peele, Farewell to Sir John Norris and Sir Francis Drake [...], in Alexander Dyce (ed.), The Works of George Peele (London: William Pickering, 1829), pp. 165–90.
George Peele, The Old Wifes’ Tale (ed. Patricia Binnie) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980), lines 663–74, pp. 74–5
Thomas Dekker, If this be not a good play, the devil is in it (1611), in Fredson Bowers (ed.), The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker, vol. III (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958), p. 161.
Kevin LaGrandeur, ‘The Talking Brass Head as a Symbol of Dangerous Knowledge in Friar Bacon and in Alphonsus King of Aragon’, English Studies, 80 (1999), p. 408.
David Hawkes, Idols of the Marketplace: Idolatry and Commodity Fetishism in English Literature, 1580–1680 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001), p. 85.
Richard F. Hardin, Civil Idolatry: Desacralizing and Monarchy in Spenser, Shakespeare and Milton (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992).
Frederick Gard Fleay, A Biographical Chronicle of the English Drama 1559–1642, vol. 1 (London: Reeves and Turner, 1891), pp. 264–5.
Scott McMillin and Sally-Beth MacLean, The Queen’s Men and their Plays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 90.
Gabriel Harvey, Letter-Book of Gabriel Harvey, A.D. 1573–1580 (ed. Edward John Long Scott) (London: Camden Society, 1884)
G. K. Hunter, English Drama, 1586–1642: The Age of Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), p. 25.
Alexander Barclay (trans.), The Ship of Fools (Edinburgh: W. Paterson, 1874).
Sebastian Brant, Das Narrenschiff (Basel, 1494); Jeff Morris, The Ship of Fools to 1500 (Eastford, CT: Martino, 2005).
J. A. Lavin (ed.), Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (London: New Mermaids, 1969), p. xiv
Waldo F. McNeir, ‘Traditional Elements in the Character of Greene’s Friar Bacon’, Studies in Philology, 45 (1948), p. 172, n. 1.
Euclid, The elements of geometrie of the most auncient philosopher Euclide of Megara [...] (London, 1570), sig. Aja-Aija; William H. Sherman, John Dee: The Politics of Reading and Writing in the English Renaissance (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995).
Warren Boutcher, ‘“Rationall Knowledges” and “Knowledges... drenched in flesh and blood”: Fulke Greville, Francis Bacon and Institutions of Humane Learning in Tudor and Stuart England’, Sidney Journal, 19 (2001), p. 15.
A. W. Ward (ed.), Marlowe: Tragical History of Dr. Faustus; Greene: Honourable History of Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901), p. xxi.
David Coleman, Drama and the Sacraments in Sixteenth-Century England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), p. 96.
Marlowe, The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus, in David Bevington and Eric Rasmussen (eds.), Oxford English Drama: Christopher Marlowe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)
Nicholas Tyacke (ed.), The History of Oxford University, Vol. IV: Seventeenth-Century Oxford (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 303.
John Guy, Tudor England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 343.
Bryan Reynolds and Henry Turner, ‘Performative Transversations: Collaborations Through and Beyond Greene’s Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay’, in Bryan Reynolds (ed.), Transversal Enterprises in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), p. 245.
Alan C. Dessen, ‘Robert Greene and the Theatrical Vocabulary of the Early 1590s’, in Kirk Melnikoff and Edward Gieskes (eds.), Writing Robert Greene: Essays on England’s First Notorious Professional Writer (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), p. 34
Deanne Williams, ‘Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay and the Rhetoric of Temporality’, in Gordon McMullan and David Matthews (eds.), Reading the Medieval in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 32.
Mark Dahlquist, ‘Love and Technological Iconoclasm in Robert Greene’s Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay’, English Literary History, 78 (2011), p. 52.
Margaret Aston, England’s Iconoclasts, Volume 1: Laws Against Images (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), pp. 10
Martin Luther, Lectures on Deuteronomy, in Conrad Bergendoff (ed.), Works, vol. IX (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1958), pp. 80–1.
Ellen Spolsky, Word vs. Image: Cognitive Hunger in Shakespeare’s England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), p. 58.
John Donne, Satyre III, in C. A. Patrides (ed.), John Donne: Complete English Poems (London: Everyman, 2001), lines 76–7, p. 162.
J. Churton Collins (ed.), The Plays and Poems of Robert Greene, vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905), p. 70.
For further discussion of a possible link between Greene and Creede, see G. M. Pinciss, ‘Thomas Creede and the Repertory of the Queen’s Men, 1583–1592’, Modern Philology, 67 (1970), pp. 321–30.
Christopher Marlowe, The Jew of Malta, ed. T. W. Craik (London: Ernest Benn, 1966), I.i, p. 11
Andrew Gurr, The Shakespearean Stage, 1574–1642, 3rd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 151.
For further discussion of Hermione’s statue in The Winter’s Tale, see Michael O’Connell, The Idolatrous Eye: Iconoclasm and Theater in Early Modern England (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 142.
James Simeon, Shakespearean Iconoclasm (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), pp. 19–20.
Jonathan V. Crewe, ‘The Theatre of the Idols’, in David Scott Kastan and Peter Stallybrass (eds.), Staging the Renaissance: Reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 53.
Jonas Barish, The Anti-Theatrical Prejudice (Berkeley: University of California, 1981), p. 80.
Moshe Halbertal and Avishai Margalit, Idolatry (trans. Naomi Goldblum) (London: Harvard University Press, 1992), p. 3.
Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London: Routledge, 2004), p. 347.
John Rainolds, Th’overthrow of stage-playes (London, 1599), p. 161; Michael O’Connell, ‘The Idolatrous Eye: Iconoclasm, Anti-Theatricalism and the Image of the Elizabethan Theatre’, English Literary History, 52 (1985), p. 279.
Jean Elizabeth Howard, The Stage and Social Struggle in Early Modern England (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 28
Alison Shell, Shakespeare and Religion (London: Methuen Drama, 2010), p. 40.
Ernest B. Gilman, Iconoclasm and Poetry in the English Reformation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), p. 1.
Martin Butler (ed.), The Selected Plays of Ben Jonson, vol. II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 286–90
Clifford Davidson, ‘Judgement, Iconoclasm, and Anti-Theatricalism in Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair’, Papers on Language and Literature, 25 (1989), pp. 349–63.
Martin Luther, Table Talk, cited in Kenneth M. Setton, ‘Lutheranism and the Turkish Peril’, Balkan Studies, 3 (1945), p. 151
Stephen Schmuck, ‘The “Turk”, Antichrist and Elizabeth I: Reformation Politics and “The Turkes Storye” from John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments (1570)’, Reformation, 10 (2005), p. 23.
Matthew Dimmock, New Turkes: Dramatizing Islam and the Ottomans in Early Modern England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005), p. 180.
All quotations are derived from J. S. Cunningham’s edition: Christopher Marlowe, Tamburlaine the Great (ed. J. S. Cunningham) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1981).
William Empson, Some Versions of Pastoral (London: Chatto & Windus, 1935), p. 31
Barbara Traister, Heavenly Necromancers: The Magician in English Renaissance Drama (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1984), pp. 67–87.
Catherine Bates, The Rhetoric of Courtship in Elizabethan Language and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 1–2.
Douglas Bruster, Drama and the Market in the Age of Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 99
Heather James, Shakespeare’s Troy: Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 13–30.
Brian Walsh, ‘“Deep Prescience”: Succession and the Politics of Prophecy in Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England, 23 (2010), p. 64
Ian McAdam, ‘Masculinity and Magic in Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama, 37 (1998), pp. 42–3
Frank Ardolino, ‘“Thus Glories England Over All the West”: Setting as National Encomium in Robert Greene’s Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay’, Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9 (1988), pp. 218–22.
Ernst Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), p. 206
Marie Axton, The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession (London: Royal Historical Society, 1977)
Albert Rolls, The Theory of the King’s Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000).
John Bossy, Christianity in the West: 1400–1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), p. 145.
Richard C. McCoy, Alterations of State: Sacred Kingship in the English Reformation (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), p. x.
Tom Gunning, ‘“Now You See It, Now You Don’t”: The Temporality of the Cinema of Attractions’, in Richard Abel (ed.), Silent Film (London: Athlone, 1996), p. 72.
Tom Gunning, ‘The Cinema of Attraction[s]: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde’, in Wanda Strauven (ed.), The Cinema of Attractions: Reloaded (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2000), p. 384.
Christian Metz, Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974), pp. 44–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Jenny Sager
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sager, J. (2013). The Brazen Head in Alphonsus King of Aragon and Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay. In: The Aesthetics of Spectacle in Early Modern Drama and Modern Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332400_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332400_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46170-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33240-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)