Abstract
Adam Smith’s essay on ‘The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries; Illustrated by the History of Astronomy’ was composed in the 1750s, but not published until the posthumous Essays on Philosophical Subjects (1795), edited by James Hutton and Joseph Black. In it, Smith, drawing on technical descriptions of ‘the sublime’ within the genre of eighteenth-century British philosophical aesthetics, traces the interest in astronomy amongst primitive peoples to the ‘wonder, surprise, and astonishment’ occasioned by the night sky.2 ‘For Smith then, astronomy, at least in its beginnings, is an enquiry into the ‘natural sublime’. As we have seen, in her seminal study of the surge of interest in the ‘natural sublime’ in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century Britain, Nicolson, who curiously does not mention Smith’s essay, attributes that interest, at least in part, to technological advancements in optical instrumentation. It was the development of more powerful telescopes, Nicolson argues, which revealed to late Renaissance Europe the existence of a physical universe which was far larger than previously thought. Gradually, Nicolson suggests, the affective responses which had previously been occasioned by reflection on the idea of the divine came to be transferred to this new universe, and eventually to all natural phenomena which seemed to partake of, or were capable of evoking, the idea of the infinite.3
Of all the phaenomena of nature, the celestial appearances are, by their grandeur and beauty, the most universal object of the curiosity of mankind.
— Adam Smith, Essays on Philosophical Subjects1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Joseph Hillis-Miller, The Disappearance of God (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963), pp. 22
Robert Platzner, ‘“Persecutions of the Infinite”: De Quincey’s “System of the Heavens as Revealed by Lord Rosse’s Telescopes” as an Inquiry into the Sublime’, in Sensibility in Transformation, ed. Sydney Macmillan Conger (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990), pp. 195–207
John Barrell, The Infection of Thomas De Quincey (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991), pp. 104–25
Robert Lance Snyder, ‘“The Loom of the Palingenesis”: De Quincey’s Cosmology in “System of the Heavens”’, in Thomas De Quincey: Bicentenary Studies, ed. Robert Lance Snyder (London: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985), pp. 338–59.
See Jonathan Smith, ‘Thomas De Quincey, John Herschel, and JP Nichol Confront the Great Nebula in Orion’ (1992), at www.personal-umd.umich.edu/~jonsmith/orion.html (accessed August 2012); and Murray, ‘Vestiges of the Phoenix’, pp. 243–60. De Quincey’s engagement with Richter, which I consider in detail later, was first described in Frederick Burwick, ‘The Dream-Visions of Jean Paul and Thomas De Quincey’, Comparative Literature 20/1 (Winter 1968), pp. 1–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Cian Duffy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duffy, C. (2013). ‘My purpose was humbler, but also higher’: Thomas De Quincey at the Final Frontier. In: The Landscapes of the Sublime, 1700–1830. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332189_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332189_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46160-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33218-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)