Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Radical Theologies ((RADT))

Abstract

Writing about theology in relation to ecology may seem strange within the scope of a book that itself stands within no particular religious tradition, or, more exactly, is unconcerned with its standing within any particular religious tradition as it aims for a “secularity of thought” within its own “non-theological” discourse.1 There may even seem to be an air of insincerity or a cynical appeal to the power of a large group present in religious communities, a group that one may disagree with because they “don’t know any better” but that can be exploited for the same reason, an attitude present in the appeal of E. O. Wilson to religious believers in his The Creation (2006).2 There is however an ultimately realist reason for considering theology within the wider paradigm of “environmental thought”: the form its thought takes is superior in a specific way to that of philosophy. Theology is concerned with many of the same questions as philosophy, and that includes the question of ethics and metaphysics raised by the ecological crisis. However, unlike the environmental philosophies discussed earlier, the works of ecotheology tend not to separate nearly as easily the ethical and the metaphysical, even within their own self-understanding of the discipline; these two strands are always unified within some broader paradigm, some single, theological vision. As will become apparent in the next chapter, this prefigures the methodology of non-philosophy; it is akin to the “vision-in-One” that non-philosophy thinks from.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. O. Wilson, The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Willis Jenkins, Ecologies of Grace: Environmental Ethics and Christian Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 77–92, 153–188.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics III.4, trans. A. T. Mackay, T. H. L. Parker, H. Knight, H. A. Kennedy, and J. Marks, eds. G. W. Bromiley and T. F. Torrance (London and New York: T&T Clark, 2004), p. 349. I’m indebted to Jeremy Ridenour for a discussion about Barth and animals.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael S. Northcott, The Environment and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 227.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. This insight is properly a non-philosophical one and comes from John Mullarkey’s own non-philosophical study of film-philosophy, where he argues from the insight: “There is always what one might call the ‘transcendental choice of film’ at work in film-philosophy: by this I mean those (inadvertently) illustrative approaches that use particular films to establish a theoretical paradigm of what film is and how it works. Yet, such approaches already make their selections of particular films or film elements (of plot over sound, or framing over genre, and so on) in the light of the theory of film in question, and are therefore circular” (John Mullarkey, Refractions of Reality: Philosophy and the Moving Lmage [Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2008], p. 5).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Sallie McFague The Body of God: An Ecological Theology (London: SCM Press, 1993), p. 29. McFague, unlike Northcott, does not locate a golden age, though she, unlike Ruether, does locate a prior age of “wilderness,” resistant to dualisms, that gives her theology the shape of being formed a bit more by the declension narrative than other theologians in the inflection type. See ibid., p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leonardo Boff, Cry of the Earth, Cry of the Poor, trans. Philip Berryman (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1997), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosemary Radford Ruether, Gaia & God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing (London: SCM Press, 1992), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leonardo Boff, Ecology and Liberation: A New Paradigm, trans. John Cumming (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1995), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Anthony Paul Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, A.P. (2013). Theology and Ecology. In: A Non-Philosophical Theory of Nature. Radical Theologies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331977_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics