Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Radical Theologies ((RADT))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

The most important concept within ecology is the ecosystem. This concept has changed over time, but the currently accepted definition is that the ecosystem is a physically locatable and quantifiable community formed by a system of energy exchange between the living, the dead, and the never-living where, when energy animates the system, there is an exchange of energy and material between the living and the dead.1 It is not often understood that this concept, the most important and foundational within ecology, was created in response to the overdetermination of ecology by two schools of thought: organicism and mechanism. These schools of thought are philosophical and theological in their make-up and concern the reality of nature as such. The ecosystem concept is first articulated in 1935 by A. G. Tansley in his unification of these two rival schools of thought as they were understood and shaped by the material and stance of ecology. The organicists, primarily developed in and from the work of F. E. Clements, were opposed by the individualist reaction against organicism of Henry Gleason and his followers. In Clements’s view the ecosystem, which he named “biome,” was like a single organism where all the parts worked toward the health of the whole. Whereas Gleason rejected this organic view of nature and instead proposed that natural communities of plants are simply a random grouping of individual species that existed in that place because of the possibility of satisfying their needs, Tansley rejected the organicism of Clements, but could not follow the coincidentalism of Gleason, which constituted a decisive critique of Clements’s views but did not provide any satisfactory understanding of the relation between plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This understanding of ecosystem is faithful to the mature formulation by A. G. Tansley in 1935. See A. G. Tansley, “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms,” Ecology 16.3 (1935): 299–303. See also Christian Lévêque, Ecology: From Ecosystem to Biosphere (Plymouth, UK: Science Publisher, Inc.), pp. 25–27. I am deeply indebted to my colleague and friend Prof. Liam Heneghan of DePaul University’s Institute for Nature and Culture for the concept of the “never-living” and his help in understanding the concept of ecosystem more fully.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. For one account of the history of the development of the ecosystem concept, see L é vê que, Ecology, pp. 15–35. For a longer, more explicitly historical account, see Frank Benjamin Golley, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum of the Parts (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993). I will return to the ecosystem explicitly in part III. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel B. Botkin, Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botkin provides more historical detail on each image than I do and I refer the reader to his book for the historical specificities of each image. For a fuller picture of the ideas and attitudes toward nature, but without the connection to ecological practices, the reader should also consult Peter Coates, Nature: Western Attitudes since Ancient Times (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Alain Badiou, The Century, trans. Alberto Toscano (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), pp. 48–57. There he suggests that this passion is what differentiates the twentieth century from preceding ones, a claim that would suggest my drawing on this notion to explain images of thought from prior centuries is misplaced, but his own claim is undercut by calling on forebearers for this passion such as Hegel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Anthony Paul Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, A.P. (2013). Ecology and Thought. In: A Non-Philosophical Theory of Nature. Radical Theologies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331977_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics