Skip to main content

Why Does Precious Have to Lighten Up or Shuffle? Teaching with Lee Daniels’s “Adaptation”

  • Chapter
  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

We want to be clear from the outset that this chapter is about the teaching of a film—Lee Daniels’s 2009 Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire—and that our primary goal is to think through some pedagogical issues that may arise for instructors who are considering using this film to help teach the works of Sapphire. While there may have been a time in some distant past when film was used unproblematically in a classroom, teachers and scholars are increasingly interested in thinking through the actual pedagogical values of a given film text. In the introduction to his Reading in the Dark: Using Film as a Tool in the English Classroom, John Golden engages some of the complexities entangled with any attempt to use film as a pedagogical tool. He begins with a simple, yet significant, query: “What really happens when we show movies in the … classroom?” (xiii). Golden notes some of the diverse reasons that have been suggested for teaching with film: “Oftentimes, what we show is the film version of a written text that our students have read or are in the midst of reading, or an extension of the written text that might have similar characters, time period, or themes. In addition, some teachers are fortunate enough to be able to teach film history or film as its own separate and unique text” (xiii). Implicit in Golden’s observation is the understanding that teaching a film text carries with it a number of complex considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Avatar. Dir. James Cameron. Twentieth Century Fox, 2009. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Blind Side. Dir. John Lee Hancock. Warner Bros. Pictures, 2009. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought. Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York and London: Routledge, 2000. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Damien, and Michael P. Levine, eds. Thinking Through Film: Doing Philosophy and Watching Movies. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2012. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, Thomas. Slow Fade to Black: The Negro in American Film, 1900–1942. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1977. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, Henry A. “Breaking into the Movies: Pedagogy and the Politics of Film.” Journal of Advanced Composition 21.3 (2001): 583–98. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, John. Reading in the Dark: Using Film as a Tool in the English Classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 2001. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, Rick. “X-Men: First Class Delivers the X Factor.” The Globe & Mail 3 June 2011. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, Ed. Framing Blackness: The African American Image in Film. Philadelphia, PA: Temple UP, 1993. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Lion King. Dir. Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff. Walt Disney Pictures, 1994. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumenick, Lou. “‘The Blind Side’: Gridiron Maiden.” New York Post 20 Nov. 2009. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, Christopher. “The Movie Review: ‘Precious.’” The New Republic 13 Nov. 2009. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Michael. “Movie Review: ‘Avatar.’” Chicago Tribune 11 Dec. 2009. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire. Dir. Lee Daniels. Lionsgate, 2009. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire (2008).” Rotten Tomatoes. Web. 1 Sept. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Peter. “X-Men: First Class: Movie Review.” The Christian Science Monitor 3 June 2011. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapphire ***. PUSH. New York: Vintage, 1996. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, Helene A. “Reinventing Privilege: The New (Gay) Man in Contemporary Popular Media.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 20.1 (Mar. 2003): 67–91. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, Eric D. “Movie Review: ‘Precious’.” Film.com. 3 June 2011. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, Peter. “Avatar.” Rolling Stone 14 Dec. 2009. Web. 25 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • X-Men: First Class. Dir. Matthew Vaughn. Twentieth Century Fox, 2011. Film.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth McNeil Neal A. Lester DoVeanna S. Fulton Lynette D. Myles

Copyright information

© 2012 Elizabeth McNeil, Neal A. Lester, DoVeanna S. Fulton, and Lynette D. Myles

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burrell, C., Wermers, J. (2012). Why Does Precious Have to Lighten Up or Shuffle? Teaching with Lee Daniels’s “Adaptation”. In: McNeil, E., Lester, N.A., Fulton, D.S., Myles, L.D. (eds) Sapphire’s Literary Breakthrough. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137330864_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics