Skip to main content

Post-Bipolar Challenges: New Visions and New Activities

  • Chapter
NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges Series ((NSECH))

  • 673 Accesses

Abstract

Opening the second part of the collection with its focus on changing security challenges and NATO’s new identity, this chapter will concentrate on NATO’s initial transformation in the 1990s after the fall of the Berlin Wall finally brought the division of Europe to an end. It is this decade in which NATO’s new identity — one key theme of this chapter — has progressively transpired and consolidated. The penultimate chapter by Sean Kay and Magnus Petersson with its outlook into NATO’s future is confined to the 2000s and beyond, hence complementing my chapter in terms of its temporal coverage of the post-Cold War period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, Emanuel. (2013), ‘Resilient Liberal Practices’, in Tim Dunne and Trine Flockhart (eds), Liberal World Orders (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel and Vincent Pouliot. (eds) (2011), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, Jeffrey. (1998), ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, 50(2): 324–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzy, Douglas. (1998), ‘Theorizing Narrative Identity: Symbolic Interactionism and Hermeneutics’, The Sociological Quarterly, 39(2): 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flockhart, Trine. (2011), ‘“Me Tarzan — You Jane”: The EU and NATO and the Reversal of Roles’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 12(3): 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flockhart, Trine. (2012), ‘From a “Practice of Talking” to a “Practice of Doing”: NATO and Sources of Change’, International Politics, 49(1): 78–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flockhart, Trine and Kristian Søby Kristensen. (2008), NATO and Global Partnerships — To be Global or to Act Globally? (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Report 2008:7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu, Alexandra. (2005), ‘Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the “New Europe”’, International Organization, 59(4): 973–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Antony. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldgeier, James M. (1999), Not Whether but When: The U.S. Decision to Enlarge NATO (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, Ted. (2010), ‘The Logic of Habit in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 16(4): 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, Jolyon. (2007), Security and Defence Policy in the European Union (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Sean. (2011), ‘Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy’, in Hakan Edström, Janne Haaland Matláry and Magnus Petersson (eds), NATO: The Power of Partnerships (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan), 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucarelli, Sonia. (2005), ‘NATO and the European System of Liberal-Democratic Security Communities’, in Trine Flockhart (ed.), Socializing Democratic Norms (Houndmills: Palgrave), 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern Bially, Janice. (2011), ‘A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations’, in Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot (eds), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 63–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, Michael. (2012), EU Security Policy: What It Is, How It Works, Why It Matters (Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitzen, Jennifer. (2006), ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State, Identity and the Security Dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12(3): 341–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1990), London Declaration: On A Transformed North Atlantic Alliance (Brussels: NATO).

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1991), The Alliance’s New Strategic Concept NATO (Brussels: NATO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, Neill. (1992), ‘The Deepening and Widening of the European Community: Recent Evolution, Maastricht and Beyond’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 30(3): 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, Vincent. (2010), International Security in Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Mark and Miles Hewstone. (1998), ‘Social Identity Theory’s Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(1): 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, David N. (1983), NATO’s Nuclear Dilemma (Washington: Brookings Inst. Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, Jamie. (2010), ‘NATO at Sixty — and Beyond’, in Gülnur Aybet and Rebecca R. Moore (eds), NATO in Search of a Vision (Washington: Georgetown University Press), 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suganami, Hidemi. (1999), ‘Agents, Structures, Narratives’, European Journal of International Relations, 5(3): 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. (1964), The Explanation of Behaviour (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies, Wallace J. (2009), Why NATO Endures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, Ole. (1998), ‘Insecurity, Security and Asecurity in the West European Non-War Community’, in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 69–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth. (1993), ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, 18(2): 44–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. (2004), ‘The State as a Person in International Theory’, Review of International Studies, 30(2): 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, Colin. (2004), ‘State Agency: Social Action without Human Activity’, Review of International Studies, 30(2): 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, Colin. (2006), Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael C. and Iver B. Neumann. (2000), ‘From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia, and the Power of Identity’, Millennium — Journal of International Studies, 29(2): 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Trine Flockhart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flockhart, T. (2014). Post-Bipolar Challenges: New Visions and New Activities. In: Mayer, S. (eds) NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137330307_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics