Skip to main content

Afghanistan’s Attitudes toward the Region

  • Chapter
The Regional Dimensions to Security

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

Afghanistan is a socially diverse country whose people hold a wide range of views about their neighbors and regional cooperation. No one single view captures the attitudes of a cross section of the Afghan population. Afghanistan’s mosaic nature is such that most of its distinct micro-societies have extensive cross-border ties with the country’s neighbors. While some among its ethnic Pashtun cluster may be well disposed toward Pakistan, many non-Pashtun groups — the Tajik, Uzbek, Turkmen, Hazara and Aymaqs — have generally shunned Pakistan’s interference in Afghanistan, especially since the collapse of the Soviet-backed government in Kabul in April 1992, and more specifically since the theocratic rule of the Taliban (1996–2001), and have looked to Afghanistan’s other neighbors for affinity and cooperation. Perhaps the most salient view on which one can rely to shed light on Afghanistan’s attitudes toward its neighbors and regionalism is to draw on what the Afghan government has expounded and formulated in the last decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. Saikal, “Afghanistan on the edge of a political abyss,” International Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, 2010, p. 28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Saikal, (ed.) Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival, London: I. B. Tauris, 2012, pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a figure of about 40 percent in the 1990s, see R. H. Magnus and E. Naby, Afghanistan: Mullah, Marx, and Mujahid, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002, p. 93

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Janata, “Afghanistan: The ethnic dimension,” in E. W. Anderson and N. Dupree (eds), The Cultural Basis of Afghan Nationalism, London: Pinter Publishers, 1990, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a detailed discussion, see Saikal, Modern Afghanistan, 2012, ch. 1; Magnus and Naby, Afghanistan: Mullah, Marx, and Mujahid, 2002, ch. 1; L. Dupree, Afghanistan, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980, part II

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Maley, The Afghanistan Wars, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. R. Rubin, The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System, 2nd edn, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. For more on Iran’s aims and objectives, see A. Saikal, The Rise and Fall of the Shah, 2nd edn, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Saikal, “Democracy and peace in Iran and Iraq,” in A. Saikal and A. Schnabel (eds), Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges, New York: United Nations University Press, 2003, pp. 166–182

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Abrahamian, Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic, London: I. B. Tauris, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For an update on Afghanistan’s current predicament, see A. Saikal (ed.), The Afghanistan Conflict and Australia’s Role, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. On Pakistan’s policies toward Afghanistan, see M. A. Weaver, Pakistan: In the Shadow of Jihad and Afghanistan, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. B. Jones, Pakistan: Eye of the Storm, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Saikal, “The role of outside actors in Afghanistan,” Middle East Policy, vol. 7, no. 4, 2000, pp. 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. On India’s interests in Afghanistan, see H. V. Pant, “India in Afghanistan: A test case for a rising power,” Contemporary South Asia, vol. 18, no. 2, 2010, pp. 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. See M. S. Roy, “Role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Afghanistan: Scope and limitations,” Strategic Analysis, vol. 34, no. 4, 2010, pp. 545–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Felbab-Brown, “Peacekeepers among poppies: Afghanistan, illicit economies and intervention,” International Peacekeeping, vol. 16, no. 1, 2009, pp. 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. For a detailed discussion, see J. Mankoff], Russian Foreign Policy: The Return ofGreat Power Politics, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Amin Saikal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saikal, A. (2013). Afghanistan’s Attitudes toward the Region. In: Snetkov, A., Aris, S. (eds) The Regional Dimensions to Security. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137330055_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics