Abstract
A large strand of the theoretical literature concerning revolutions examines the dilemma that emerges when revolutionary movements achieve statehood and are faced with the pressure to conform to the conventions of international society. David Armstrong observes that the revolutionary state commonly finds itself in a situation where ‘the belief system on which its revolution was founded and which legitimized the assumption of state power by the revolutionary elite is certain to run counter to the prevailing political doctrines of most other states’.1 At this point, scholarly opinion divides; there are those, such as Armstrong and Kenneth Waltz, who believe that revolutionary states are unable to resist external pressures to conform and eventually assume more moderate and pragmatic foreign policies. In contrast, scholars such as Raymond Aron and Fred Halliday argue that the process of socialisation is never fully accepted by revolutionary elites.2 Foreign policy then becomes a battleground in which radical and pragmatic strands compete, resulting in policies that mix ideological conditioning and realpolitik.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
S. J. Dehghani Firouz Abadi, ‘Emancipating Foreign Policy: Critical Theory and Islamic Republic of Iran’s Foreign Policy’, The Iranian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 3 (2008): 1–26
Ruhi Ramazani, ‘Ideology and Pragmatism in Iran’s Foreign Policy’, Middle East Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2004), 7.
Anoush Ehteshami, ‘Iran’s International Relations: Pragmatism in a Revolutionary Bottle’, in The Middle East Institute (ed.), The Iranian Revolution at 30 (Washington, DC: The Middle East Institute, 2009), 129.
See Alexander L. George (ed), Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management (Westview Press, 1991); Robert Jervis, ‘Hypothesis on Misperception’, World Politics, Vol. 20, No. 3 (April 1968), 454
Ralph K. White, Fearful Warriors: A Psychological Profile of U.S.-Soviet Relations (New York: Free Press, 1984), 160–161.
David Harris, The Crisis: The President, the Prophet, and the Shah — 1979 and the Coming of Militant Islam (New York: Little, Brown, and Company, 2004), 155.
Mohsen M. Milani, ‘Harvest of Shame: Tudeh and the Bazargan Government’, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1993), 307.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Christian Emery
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emery, C. (2013). US—Iranian Elite Interactions and the Pathologies of Engagement. In: US Foreign Policy and the Iranian Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329875_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329875_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46072-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32987-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)