Abstract
In his 1949 book, The Concept of Mind, Gilbert Ryle describes two distinct species of knowledge: knowledge that and knowledge how. ‘Knowledge that’ is also referred to as ‘propositional knowledge’, presented in the form of sentences such as ‘S knows that G’. Thus, where G represents the fact, ‘London is the capital of England’, in knowing that G, S knows the fact ‘London is the capital of England’. On the other hand, ‘knowing how to G’ pertains to some action. Let us say that G equates to figure skating: specifically, performing a triple salchow (a jump). In saying ‘S knows how to G’, one is not referring to facts about the salchow; rather, one is saying that S knows how to perform the manoeuvre.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further reading
Bengson, J. & Moffett, M.A. (2012). Knowing how: essays on knowledge, mind, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hetherington, S. (2008). Knowing-that, knowing-how, knowing philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 77, 307–324.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Newen, A., Bartels, A. & Jung, E-M. (2011) Knowledge and representation. Palo Alto: CSLI Publications and Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Garry Young
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, G. (2013). Philosophical Issue 5: Ryle’s Dichotomy and the Intellectualist Challenge. In: Philosophical Psychopathology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329325_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329325_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46053-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32932-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)