Skip to main content
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

A significant amount of attention was given in English-speaking philosophy in the 1980s to a body of work called communitarianism whose essence was a radical critique of liberal individualism. The authors of this work were said to be communitarian because they believed that the interests and identities of individuals were constituted by their embeddedness in particular communities, or cultural traditions, while liberals were held to affirm the contrary: that ‘communities’ were constructed out of the independent interests and self-standing identities of individuals.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The main communitarian theorists and their writings are standardly held to be M. Sandel (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. MacIntyre (1981), After Virtue (London: Duckworth)

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Taylor (1985), Philosophical Papers 1: Human Agency and Language; 2: Philosophy and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Walzer (1983), Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rawls’s book, Political Liberalism, is often appealed to in justification. In this work he denies that his theory is an elaboration of a comprehensive ideal of universal validity. It is rather the articulation of ‘fundamental ideas viewed as implicit in the public political culture of a democratic society’ and hence of ideas that can be regarded as constituting our values. J. Rawls (1993), Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press), 223.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Mulhall and A. Swift (1996), Liberals and Communitarians, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), 157–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Kymlicka (1990), Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 207–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sandel, Liberalism, 15–24, 150, 161–5, 175–83; MacIntyre, Virtue, 103–13, 204–5; C. Taylor (1979), Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 157

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandel, Liberalism, 49–53: Taylor, Philosophical Papers 1: 20–33; C. Taylor (1986), ‘Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada’, in A. Cairns and C. Williams (eds), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), 211–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Nozick (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Kant (1965), Metaphysical Elements of Justice, tr. John Ladd (Indianopolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Margaret Moore in her critical study of the foundations of liberalism accepts the notion of the potentiality of a communally constituted self to adopt a reflective and critical standpoint on its community’s cultural beliefs and practices but claims that the articulation of such a position would still necessarily be only a development of the cultural tradition itself. M. Moore (1993), Foundations of Liberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 183–8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Dworkin (2011), Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Searle (2002), ‘Animal Minds’, in his Consciousness and Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 61–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Griffin (1986), Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Parfit (1984), Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Nussbaum (1993), ‘Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach’, in M. Nussbaum (ed.), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Crisp and B. Hooker (eds) (2000), Well-being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 John Charvet

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charvet, J. (2013). Communitarianism, Old and New. In: The Nature and Limits of Human Equality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329165_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics