Abstract
The new policies involve real political, social and economic risks. One explanation rests on short-term party-political considerations, another on an economics that prioritises deficit reduction against any other goal. Neither is convincing. Britain has moved from a European to a US pattern of social inequalities during the past 30 years, due to changes in work, in patterns of residence and in the overall power of capital against labour. These shifts combine with currents in public opinion and in mass politics that strengthen social divisions and erode support for inclusive welfare. They provide the opportunity for government to move decisively against the welfare state tradition and to entrench a radical, competitive and individualistic liberalism permanently in the national political economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Peter Taylor-Gooby
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2013). Why Add Restructuring to Cutbacks? Explaining the New Policy Direction. In: The Double Crisis of the Welfare State and What We Can Do About It. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328113_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328113_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46035-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32811-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)