Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond Belief: Islamist Strategic Thinking and International Relations Theory

  • Chapter
Sacred Violence

Part of the book series: Rethinking Political Violence series ((RPV))

  • 231 Accesses

Abstract

Since the bombing attacks launched on the transport systems in Madrid in 2003 and London in 2005, and the discovery of similar plots between 2005 and 2013 in Toronto, New York, Sydney, Melbourne, London, Copenhagen, Frankfurt, and Boston, Western governments increasingly recognize that home-grown Islamist radicalization represents a profound threat to open, liberal, secular Western societies. Peter Neumann, for example, argues that Europe has developed into the “nerve centre of global jihad,”1 whilst others have noted that every major attack launched under the auspices of Al-Qaeda, even before 9/11, has had some link to Europe.2 David Kilcullen contends that Europe is both a site of conflict that jihadists exploit, and the source of intellectual capital that increasingly performs a “cadre function” for promoting both global and local jihadism.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter R. Neumann, “Europe’s Jihadist Dilemma,” Survival, 48(2) (2006), p. 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lorenzo Vidino, Al-Qaeda in Europe (Amherst, New York: Prometheus, 2005), p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See David Kilcullen, “Subversion and Counter Subversion in the Campaign Against Terrorism in Europe,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 30(8) (2006), p. 653.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Pape, Dying to Win: The Logic of Suicide Terrorism (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Louise Richardson, What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat (New York: Random House, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell D. Silber and Arvin Batt, Radicalization in the West: The Home Grown Threat (New York: New York City Police Department, 2007), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Kilcullen, a former Australian army colonel and a PhD graduate of the University of New South Wales, is today probably the most influential terrorism and insurgency analyst in Washington. His work, for instance, his advocacy of “Disaggregation” as the basis of a global counterinsurgency strategy, has informed the evolution of much US counter-terrorism strategy in recent years. See for example, David J. Kilcullen, “Countering Global Insurgency,” Journal of Strategic Studies, 28(4) (August 2005), pp. 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rohan Gunaratna, “Ideology in Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Lessons from Combating Al-Qaeda and Al Jemaah al Islamiyah in Southeast Asia” in Abdul Halim bin Kader (ed.), Fighting Terrorism: The Singapore Perspective (Singapore: Taman Bacaan, 2007), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ekaterina Stepanova, Terrorism in Asymmetrical Conflict: Ideological and Structural Aspects, SIPRI Research Report 23 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olivier Roy, “Euro-Islam: The Jihad Within,” The National Interest, 71 (Spring 2003), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taqiuddin Nabhani, The System of Islam Nidham al-Islam (London: al-Khilafah, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melanie Phillips, Londonistan (New York: Encounter, 2006), pp. 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ed Husain, The Islamist (London: Penguin, 2007), pp. 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a survey see Anthony Glees and Chris Pope, When Students Turn to Terror: Terrorist and Extremist Activity on British University Campuses (London: Social Affairs Unit, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassan Butt, “My Plea to Fellow Muslims: You Must Renounce Terror,” The Observer, 1 July 2007. See also Shiraz Maher, “How I Escaped Islamism,” The Sunday Times, 12 August 2007; Maajid Nawaz and Dawud Masieh, In and Out of Islamism (London: Quilliam Foundation, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maajid Nawaz, Radical (London: W.H. Allen, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For Qutb, after the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate, no country had replaced Turkey as the Islamic world’s centre. To bring about a new caliphate governed by God’s law there must be a revival in one Muslim country, enabling it to attain that status. Significantly, after the Taliban took Kabul in 1996 and established an Islamic state governed by shari’ah law, in the view of bin Laden and others, Afghanistan became the strongest candidate for the core of the new caliphate. See “Interview with Nida’ul Islam,” in Bruce Lawrence (ed.), Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama bin Laden (London: Verso, 2005), p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abu Hamza quoted in James Brandon, Virtual Caliphate Islamic Extremists and their Websites (London: Centre for Social Cohesion, 2008), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Taqiuddin al-Nabhani, The System of Islam (London: al-Khilafah, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. The similarity between Islamist thinking and Western styles of illiberal thought was a point initially observed and developed by Paul Berman, Terror and Liberalism (New York: Norton, 2003), esp. pp. 53–153.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paul Rogers, Global Security and the War on Terror: Elite Power and the Illusion of Control (Routledge: London, 2008), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ken Booth, “The Human Faces of Terror: Reflections in a Cracked Looking-Glass,” Critical Studies on Terror, 1(1) (April 2008), p. 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Andrew Linklater and Hidemi Suganami, The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 246–272.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. See Roy E. Jones, “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure,” Review of International Studies, 7(1) (1981), pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tim Dunne, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 5–11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. David Held and Anthony McGrew, “The End of the Old Order? Globalization and the Prospects for World Order,” Review of International Studies, 24(3) (1998), p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roger Epp, “The English School and the Frontiers of International Society,” Review of International Studies, 24(3) (1998), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barry Buzan, “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR,” Review of International Studies, 27(3) (July 2001), p. 472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. See Richard Little, “English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?” Review of International Studies, 29(3) (October 2003), pp. 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. See Dale C. Copeland, “A Realist Critique of the English School,” Review of International Studies, 29(3) (2003), p. 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin Wight did write of the three approaches that he felt characterized the study of the international system (realism, rationalism and revolutionism) see, Martin Wight, International Relations: The Three Traditions (Brian Porter and Garbriele Wight, eds) (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Martin Wight, Power Politics (London: Penguin, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nicholas J. Wheeler, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Andrew Linklater, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1990), pp. 8–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. See Andrew Linklater, “Dialogue, Dialectic and Emancipation in International Relations at the End of the Post-War Age,” Millennium, 23(1) (1994), pp. 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. See Richard Devatek, “The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory,” Millennium, 24(1) (1995), pp. 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ken Booth, “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice,” International Affairs, 67(3) (1991), p. 539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey, “The Post-Colonial Moment in Security Studies,” Review of International Studies, 32(2) (April 2006), p. 329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ken Booth, “Security and Emancipation,” Review of International Studies, 17(4) (1991), pp. 313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bhikhu Parekh, “The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy,” in David Held (ed.), Prospects for Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), pp. 156–175

    Google Scholar 

  42. Steve Smith, “The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of a International Relations Theory,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds), International Relations Theory Today (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tarak Barkawi, “On the Pedagogy of’ small Wars’,” International Affairs, 80(1) (January 2004), p. 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Richard Jackson, “Language, Policy and the Construction of a Torture Culture in the War on Terrorism,” Review of International Studies, 33(3) (2007), pp. 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Michael Stohl, “Old Myths, New Fantasies and the Enduring Realities of Terrorism,” Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(1) (April 2008), pp. 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Richard Jackson, “Genealogy, Ideology and Counter-Terrorism: Writing Wars on Terrorism from Ronald Reagan to George W. Bush Jr.,” Studies in Language and Capitalism, 1 (2006), p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ken Booth, “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice,” International Affairs, 67(3) (1991), p. 539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marie Breen Smith, Jeroen Gunning, Richard Jackson, George Kassimeris and Piers Robinson, “Critical Terrorism Studies — An Introduction,” Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(1) (April 2008), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Edward Said, Orientalism (London: Penguin, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Edward Said, Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World (London: Vintage, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Richard Jackson, “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’, in Political and Academic Discourse,” Government and Opposition, 42(3) (2007), p. 399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Richard Jackson, “Security, Democracy and the Rhetoric of Counter-Terrorism,” Democracy and Security, 1(2) (2005), p. 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Richard Jackson, “An Analysis of EU Counter-terrorism Discourse Post-September 11,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(2) (June 2007), p. 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Barkawi and Laffey, “The Post-Colonial Moment in Security Studies,” p. 347. See also Anthony Burke, “The End of Terrorism Studies,” Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(1) (2008), p. 45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. See Fred Halliday, Two Hours That Shook the World — September 11, 2001: Causes and Consequences (London: Saqi, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  56. See Jeroen Gunning, “A Case for Critical Terrorism Studies?” Government and Opposition, 2(3) (2007), pp. 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Richard Jackson, “Responses,” International Affairs, 83(1) (2007), p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Goldie Osurie, “Regimes of Terror: Contesting the War on Terror,” Borderlands, 5(6) (2006), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bill Durodié, “Fear and Terror in a Post Colonial Age,” Government and Opposition, 42(2) (2007), p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Anthony Burke, “Freedom’s Freedom: American Enlightenment and Permanent War,” Social Identities, 11(4) (2005), p. 315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Antony Burke, “Against the New Internationalism,” Ethics and International Affairs, 19(4) (2005), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Anthony Burke, “Reply to Jean Bethke Elshstein: For a Cautious Utopianism,” Ethics and International Affairs, 19(4) (2005), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  63. John J. Mearsheimer, “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On,” International Relations, 19(2) (2005), p. 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tim Dunne and Nicholas J. Wheeler, “ ‘We the Peoples’: Contending Discourses of Security in Human Rights Theory and Practice,” International Relations, 18(1) (2004), p. 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. David Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See Azzam Karim, “Islamisms, Globalization, Religion and Power,” in Ronaldo Munck and Purnaka de Silva (eds), Postmodern Insurgencies: Political Violence, Identity Formation and Peacemaking in Comparative Perspective (London: Macmillan, 2000), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  67. John Esposito, The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Meghan Morris, “White Panic or Mad Max and the Sublime,” in Chen Kuan-Hsing (ed.), Trajectories: Inter-Asian Cultural Studies (London: Routledge, 1998), p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  69. See David Campbell, The Social Basis of Australian and New Zealand Security Policy (Canberra: Pacific Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 1989), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Cited in Simon Philpott, “Fear of the Dark: Indonesia and the Australian National Imagination,” Australian Journal of International Affairs, 55(3) (2001), p. 376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Richard Jordan, Danial Maliniak, Amy Oaks, Susan Peterson and Michael Tierney, One Discipline or Many? TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculties in Ten Countries (Willamsburg, VA: Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Project published by the Institute of the Theory and Practice of International Relations, February 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ruth Blakeley paper at BISA 2006, subsequently published as Ruth Blakely, “Bringing the State Back into Terrorism Studies,” European Political Science, 6(9) (2007), pp. 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ruth Blakeley, “The Elephant in the Room: A Response to John Horgan and Michael J. Boyle,” Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(2) (2008), pp. 153–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Queensland, Australia

    David Martin Jones (Reader in Political Science)

  2. King’s College London, UK

    M. L. R. Smith (Professor of Strategic Theory)

Authors
  1. David Martin Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. L. R. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2014 David Martin Jones and M. L. R. Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, D.M., Smith, M.L.R. (2014). Beyond Belief: Islamist Strategic Thinking and International Relations Theory. In: Sacred Violence. Rethinking Political Violence series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328069_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation