Skip to main content

Household Property, Sources of Income, and Economic Activity

  • Chapter
Ottoman High Politics and the Ulema Household

Abstract

The financial burden of running a household numbering hundreds of persons was very heavy, and did not consist solely of finding employment for everyone and consolidating their economic activities. The head of the grandee household had to bear the burden of the many and variegated expenses that arose from the necessity to present expensive gifts to the sultan and senior members of the Ottoman elite, from payments for appointments to covering the costs of food and clothing for the members of the household. In most cases, the sources of income granted by the sultan — salaries, special grants, estates, and so on — did not suffice for the household’s upkeep. Thus for example, Kunt found that in 1670–1 the income of Ömer Pasha, the governor of Diyarbekir, was 123,600 kuruş esedi1 while his expenditures amounted to 128,738.25 kuruş esedi.2 Often, this was a deliberate policy of the sultan who wanted to curb the power of the heads of grandee households and to increase their dependency on his largesse.3 For that reason, the heads of grandee households undertook various steps to augment their income: tax farming, private investments in agriculture and industry, commercial and real estate dealings, money lending, and the establishment of religious endowments. With regard to the last of these, its importance was not only economic, but also defined the household’s significance and bounds (for a fuller discussion see chapter 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Abou-El-Haj, Paşa Households, p. 446, n. 36; Göçek, Demise, pp. 57–8, 62–3; Ehud R. Toledano, Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1998, pp. 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cavid Baysun, “Müsadere”, İA, VIII (1957), pp. 669–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, p. 28; See also Richard Repp, “Some Observations on the Development of the Ottoman Learned Hierarchy”, in Nikki R. Keddie (ed.), Scholars, Saints and Sufis: Muslims Religious Institutions in the Middle East Since 1500, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, p. 170; Uzunçarsfili, İlmiye, pp. 66, 87–90, 158; Dursun, Siyaset ve Din, p. 275; Ahmed Sühyel Ünver, “XVIIinci Yüzyil Sonunda Padişah bir Layiha”, Belleten, 33 (1969), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Ohsson, Tableau General, IV, p. 610; Akgündüz, Şeyhülislamlik, p. 198; Mahmud Kemal İbnülemin, “Arpalik”, Türk Tarih Encümeni Mecmuasi, 17 (1926), pp. 280–1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ünver, Layiha, p. 28; See also Koçi Bey, Risale, Zuhuri Danişman (ed.), İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basimevi, 1972, pp. 127

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernard Lewis, Islam in History: Ideas, Men and Events in the Middle East, New York: Library Press, 1973, pp. 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For examples of 20th-century researchers who have dealt with the advice literature as symptoms of decline see Abou El-Haj, Formation, pp. 116–18 n. 35. See also Linda Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, Tax Collection and Finance Administration in the Ottoman Empire, 1560–1660, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmet Mumcu, Osmanli Devletinde Rüşvet, Second Edition, İstanbul: İnkilap Kitabevi, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haim Gerber, State, Society, and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective, Albany: State University of NewYork Press, 1994, pp. 157–61, 182–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abou El-Haj, Formation, 8–9, 55–8. See also Ariel Salzmann, Tocqueville in the Ottoman Empire: Rival Paths to the Modern State, Leiden: Brill, 2004, pp. 104–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abou El-Haj, Formation, pp. 8–9, 108–9; As for Rubinstein’s article see W. D. Rubinstein, “The End of ‘Old Corruption’ in Britain”, Past and Present, 101 (1983), pp. 55–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yücel Özkaya, XVIII.Yüzyilda Osmanli Kurumlari ve Osmanli Toplum Yaşantisi, Ankara: Kültür Bakanliği, 1985, p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinhard, Papal Power, pp. 329–56;Kettering, Patrons, pp. 192–206; G. E. Aylmer, The King’s Servants: The Civil Service of Charles I, 1625–1642, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961, pp. 216–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lavender Cassels, The Struggle for the Ottoman Empire, 1717–1740, London: J. Murray, 1966, p. 25

    Google Scholar 

  16. Norbert Elias, The Court Society, trans. By Edmund Jephcott, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983, pp. 181

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jack A. Goldstone, “East and West in the Seventeenth Century: Political Crises in Stuart England, Ottoman Turkey, and Ming China”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 30/1 (1988), p. 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcel Mauss, The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. By Ian Cunnison, London: Cohen and West, 1969, especially pp. 1

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Rosenthal and others, “Hiba”, EI2, III (1966), pp. 342–50

    Google Scholar 

  20. Franz Rosenthal, “Gifts and Bribes: The Muslim View”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 108/2 (1964), pp. 135–44.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharon Kettering, “Gift-Giving and Patronage in Early Modern France”, French History, 2/2 (1988), pp. 131–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kunt, Diyarbekir, pp. 35, 46, 48–9; Salzmann, Tocqueville, pp. 84, 93; Rycaut, The Present State, pp. 49–50; Mehmed Z. Pakalin, “Hediye Beha”, Osmanli Tarih Deyimleri ve Terimleri Sözlügü, Vol. 1, İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basimevi, 1983, p. 795.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Göçek, Demise, p. 26; Uzunçarfili, Saray, pp. 75–6; Halil İnalcik, “Matbakh”, EI2, VI (1989), pp. 809–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. Spuler, “Hiba”, EI2 III (1966), pp. 349–50

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cantemir, Growth and Decay, p. 159, n. 32; Pakalin, Deyimler, Vol. 1, “Hilat”, pp. 833–4; N. A. Stillman, “Khil’a”, EI2, V (1979), pp. 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Markus Koller, “The Istanbul Fur Market in the 18th Century”, in Vera Costantini and Markus Koller (eds), Living in the Ottoman Ecumenical Community, Leiden: Brill, 2008, pp. 127–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. On the arpalik system see: İbnülemin, Arpalik, pp. 276–83; Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 118–21, 182–5, 195; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 66–9; Idem, Circulation, pp. 353–5; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 108–9, 124, 126; Kunt, Servants, pp. 76, 87, 90; D’Ohsson, Tableau General, IV, pp. 491, 574–6, 612–4; Uğur, Ottoman Ulema, pp. lxiv-lxvi; Cahit Baltaci, “Arpalik”, TDVİA, 3 (1996), pp. 392–3

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Mantran, “Arpalik”, EI2, I (1958), p. 658

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Tayyib Gökbilgin, “Arpalik”, İA, I (1950), pp. 592–5

    Google Scholar 

  30. Halil İnalcik, “Centralization and Decentralization in Ottoman Administration”, in Thomas Naff and Roger Owen (eds.), Studies in Eighteenth Century Islamic Century, Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977, pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pamuk, Fiyatlar ve Ücretler, p. ix; Artan, Food Consumption, pp. 130, 134–5; Rhoads Murphey, Ottoman Warfare, 1500–1700, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999, pp. 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suraiya Faroqhi, “Camels, Wagons, and the Ottoman State in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century”, IJMES, 14 (1982), pp. 523–39

    Google Scholar 

  33. Halil İnalcik, “Introduction: Empire and Population”, in Halil İnalcik and Donald Quataert (eds.), An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  34. On the iltizam see, for example, Darling, Revenue-Raising, 47, 119–60 and passim; İnalcik, Transformation, pp. 327–33; Ahmet Tabakoğlu, Gerileme Dönemine Girerken Osmanli Maliyesi, İstanbul: Dergah Yayinlari, 1985, pp. 122–9

    Google Scholar 

  35. Murat Çizakça, A Comparative Evolution of Business Partnerships, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996, pp. 140–59.

    Google Scholar 

  36. On the shift from short-term tax farming to the long-term malikane system see Raşid, Tarih, II, pp. 288–9; Çizakça, Business Partnerships, pp. 159–78; Ariel Salzman, “An Ancien Régime Revisited: ‘Privatization’ and Political Economy in the Eighteenth Century Ottoman Empire”, Politics and Society, 21/4 (1993), pp. 393–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mehmet Genç, “Osmanli Maliyesinde Malikane Sistemi”, in Osman Okyar and H. Ünal Nalbantoğlu (eds), Türkiye İktisat Tarihi Semineri, Ankara: Hacetepe Üniversitesi Yayinlari, 1975, pp. 231–96

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huri İslamoğlu-Inan (ed.), The Ottoman Empire and the World-Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 345–73.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Çizakça, Business Partnerships, pp. 159–60, 163, 165; Genç, A Study of the Feasibility, pp. 348, 352, 356; Şevket Pamuk, “The Evolution of Financial Institutions in the Ottoman Empire”, Financial History Review, Vol. 11/1 (2004), pp. 16–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, I, p. 240; Amnon Cohen and Bernard Lewis], Population and Revenue in the Towns of Palestine in the Sixteenth Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978, pp. 65–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Neşe Erim, “Trade, Traders and State in Eighteenth Century Erzurum”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 5–6 (1991), pp. 123–8.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ülkü Özsöy, “Şeyhülislam Zekeriyya Efendi ve Yahya Efendi Vakfiyeleri Üzerine”, JTS 22 (1998), pp. 162–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zilfi, Circulation, p. 350; Idem, Ulama, p. 67. See also Ö. L. Barkan and E. H. Ayverdi (eds), İstanbul Vakiflari Tahrir Defteri: 953 (1546) Tarihli, İstanbul: İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti İstanbul Enstitüsü, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  44. İsmet Kayaoğlu, “Beşir Ağa Vakfi”, Belgeler, 11 (1989), pp. 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tietze, Andreas, “Mustafa Ali on Luxury and Status Symbols of Ottoman Gentlemen”, in Aldo Gallota and Ygo Mazarazzi (eds), Studia Turcologica Memoriae Alexi Bombaci Dicta, Naples: Instituto Universitario Orientale, 1982, pp. 577–90

    Google Scholar 

  46. İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, p. 142; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 170–1; Randi Deguilhem, “Wakf”, EI2, XI (2000), pp. 88–9

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bahaeddin Yediyildiz, “Vakif”, İA, 13 (1986), p. 162

    Google Scholar 

  48. Metin Kunt, “The Wakf as in Instrument of Public Policy: Notes on The Köprülü Family Endowments”, in Colin Heywood and Colin Imber (eds), Studies in Ottoman History in Honour of Prof. V. L. Menage, Istanbul: Isis Press, 1994, pp. 189–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Nizri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nizri, M. (2014). Household Property, Sources of Income, and Economic Activity. In: Ottoman High Politics and the Ulema Household. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326904_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326904_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46004-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32690-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics