Abstract
The financial burden of running a household numbering hundreds of persons was very heavy, and did not consist solely of finding employment for everyone and consolidating their economic activities. The head of the grandee household had to bear the burden of the many and variegated expenses that arose from the necessity to present expensive gifts to the sultan and senior members of the Ottoman elite, from payments for appointments to covering the costs of food and clothing for the members of the household. In most cases, the sources of income granted by the sultan — salaries, special grants, estates, and so on — did not suffice for the household’s upkeep. Thus for example, Kunt found that in 1670–1 the income of Ömer Pasha, the governor of Diyarbekir, was 123,600 kuruş esedi1 while his expenditures amounted to 128,738.25 kuruş esedi.2 Often, this was a deliberate policy of the sultan who wanted to curb the power of the heads of grandee households and to increase their dependency on his largesse.3 For that reason, the heads of grandee households undertook various steps to augment their income: tax farming, private investments in agriculture and industry, commercial and real estate dealings, money lending, and the establishment of religious endowments. With regard to the last of these, its importance was not only economic, but also defined the household’s significance and bounds (for a fuller discussion see chapter 5).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Abou-El-Haj, Paşa Households, p. 446, n. 36; Göçek, Demise, pp. 57–8, 62–3; Ehud R. Toledano, Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1998, pp. 4–5
Cavid Baysun, “Müsadere”, İA, VIII (1957), pp. 669–73.
Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, p. 28; See also Richard Repp, “Some Observations on the Development of the Ottoman Learned Hierarchy”, in Nikki R. Keddie (ed.), Scholars, Saints and Sufis: Muslims Religious Institutions in the Middle East Since 1500, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972, p. 30.
İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, p. 170; Uzunçarsfili, İlmiye, pp. 66, 87–90, 158; Dursun, Siyaset ve Din, p. 275; Ahmed Sühyel Ünver, “XVIIinci Yüzyil Sonunda Padişah bir Layiha”, Belleten, 33 (1969), p. 29.
D’Ohsson, Tableau General, IV, p. 610; Akgündüz, Şeyhülislamlik, p. 198; Mahmud Kemal İbnülemin, “Arpalik”, Türk Tarih Encümeni Mecmuasi, 17 (1926), pp. 280–1.
Ünver, Layiha, p. 28; See also Koçi Bey, Risale, Zuhuri Danişman (ed.), İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basimevi, 1972, pp. 127
Bernard Lewis, Islam in History: Ideas, Men and Events in the Middle East, New York: Library Press, 1973, pp. 199–213.
For examples of 20th-century researchers who have dealt with the advice literature as symptoms of decline see Abou El-Haj, Formation, pp. 116–18 n. 35. See also Linda Darling, Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy, Tax Collection and Finance Administration in the Ottoman Empire, 1560–1660, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996, pp. 6–7.
Ahmet Mumcu, Osmanli Devletinde Rüşvet, Second Edition, İstanbul: İnkilap Kitabevi, 1985.
Haim Gerber, State, Society, and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective, Albany: State University of NewYork Press, 1994, pp. 157–61, 182–3.
Abou El-Haj, Formation, 8–9, 55–8. See also Ariel Salzmann, Tocqueville in the Ottoman Empire: Rival Paths to the Modern State, Leiden: Brill, 2004, pp. 104–6.
Abou El-Haj, Formation, pp. 8–9, 108–9; As for Rubinstein’s article see W. D. Rubinstein, “The End of ‘Old Corruption’ in Britain”, Past and Present, 101 (1983), pp. 55–86.
Yücel Özkaya, XVIII.Yüzyilda Osmanli Kurumlari ve Osmanli Toplum Yaşantisi, Ankara: Kültür Bakanliği, 1985, p. 186.
Reinhard, Papal Power, pp. 329–56;Kettering, Patrons, pp. 192–206; G. E. Aylmer, The King’s Servants: The Civil Service of Charles I, 1625–1642, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961, pp. 216–40
Lavender Cassels, The Struggle for the Ottoman Empire, 1717–1740, London: J. Murray, 1966, p. 25
Norbert Elias, The Court Society, trans. By Edmund Jephcott, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983, pp. 181
Jack A. Goldstone, “East and West in the Seventeenth Century: Political Crises in Stuart England, Ottoman Turkey, and Ming China”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 30/1 (1988), p. 119.
Marcel Mauss, The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. By Ian Cunnison, London: Cohen and West, 1969, especially pp. 1
F. Rosenthal and others, “Hiba”, EI2, III (1966), pp. 342–50
Franz Rosenthal, “Gifts and Bribes: The Muslim View”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 108/2 (1964), pp. 135–44.
Sharon Kettering, “Gift-Giving and Patronage in Early Modern France”, French History, 2/2 (1988), pp. 131–51.
Kunt, Diyarbekir, pp. 35, 46, 48–9; Salzmann, Tocqueville, pp. 84, 93; Rycaut, The Present State, pp. 49–50; Mehmed Z. Pakalin, “Hediye Beha”, Osmanli Tarih Deyimleri ve Terimleri Sözlügü, Vol. 1, İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basimevi, 1983, p. 795.
Göçek, Demise, p. 26; Uzunçarfili, Saray, pp. 75–6; Halil İnalcik, “Matbakh”, EI2, VI (1989), pp. 809–10.
B. Spuler, “Hiba”, EI2 III (1966), pp. 349–50
Cantemir, Growth and Decay, p. 159, n. 32; Pakalin, Deyimler, Vol. 1, “Hilat”, pp. 833–4; N. A. Stillman, “Khil’a”, EI2, V (1979), pp. 6–7
Markus Koller, “The Istanbul Fur Market in the 18th Century”, in Vera Costantini and Markus Koller (eds), Living in the Ottoman Ecumenical Community, Leiden: Brill, 2008, pp. 127–8.
On the arpalik system see: İbnülemin, Arpalik, pp. 276–83; Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 118–21, 182–5, 195; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 66–9; Idem, Circulation, pp. 353–5; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 108–9, 124, 126; Kunt, Servants, pp. 76, 87, 90; D’Ohsson, Tableau General, IV, pp. 491, 574–6, 612–4; Uğur, Ottoman Ulema, pp. lxiv-lxvi; Cahit Baltaci, “Arpalik”, TDVİA, 3 (1996), pp. 392–3
R. Mantran, “Arpalik”, EI2, I (1958), p. 658
M. Tayyib Gökbilgin, “Arpalik”, İA, I (1950), pp. 592–5
Halil İnalcik, “Centralization and Decentralization in Ottoman Administration”, in Thomas Naff and Roger Owen (eds.), Studies in Eighteenth Century Islamic Century, Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977, pp. 29–30.
Pamuk, Fiyatlar ve Ücretler, p. ix; Artan, Food Consumption, pp. 130, 134–5; Rhoads Murphey, Ottoman Warfare, 1500–1700, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999, pp. 89–90.
Suraiya Faroqhi, “Camels, Wagons, and the Ottoman State in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century”, IJMES, 14 (1982), pp. 523–39
Halil İnalcik, “Introduction: Empire and Population”, in Halil İnalcik and Donald Quataert (eds.), An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 39.
On the iltizam see, for example, Darling, Revenue-Raising, 47, 119–60 and passim; İnalcik, Transformation, pp. 327–33; Ahmet Tabakoğlu, Gerileme Dönemine Girerken Osmanli Maliyesi, İstanbul: Dergah Yayinlari, 1985, pp. 122–9
Murat Çizakça, A Comparative Evolution of Business Partnerships, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996, pp. 140–59.
On the shift from short-term tax farming to the long-term malikane system see Raşid, Tarih, II, pp. 288–9; Çizakça, Business Partnerships, pp. 159–78; Ariel Salzman, “An Ancien Régime Revisited: ‘Privatization’ and Political Economy in the Eighteenth Century Ottoman Empire”, Politics and Society, 21/4 (1993), pp. 393–423
Mehmet Genç, “Osmanli Maliyesinde Malikane Sistemi”, in Osman Okyar and H. Ünal Nalbantoğlu (eds), Türkiye İktisat Tarihi Semineri, Ankara: Hacetepe Üniversitesi Yayinlari, 1975, pp. 231–96
Huri İslamoğlu-Inan (ed.), The Ottoman Empire and the World-Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 345–73.
Çizakça, Business Partnerships, pp. 159–60, 163, 165; Genç, A Study of the Feasibility, pp. 348, 352, 356; Şevket Pamuk, “The Evolution of Financial Institutions in the Ottoman Empire”, Financial History Review, Vol. 11/1 (2004), pp. 16–17
Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, I, p. 240; Amnon Cohen and Bernard Lewis], Population and Revenue in the Towns of Palestine in the Sixteenth Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978, pp. 65–7.
Neşe Erim, “Trade, Traders and State in Eighteenth Century Erzurum”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 5–6 (1991), pp. 123–8.
Ülkü Özsöy, “Şeyhülislam Zekeriyya Efendi ve Yahya Efendi Vakfiyeleri Üzerine”, JTS 22 (1998), pp. 162–4.
Zilfi, Circulation, p. 350; Idem, Ulama, p. 67. See also Ö. L. Barkan and E. H. Ayverdi (eds), İstanbul Vakiflari Tahrir Defteri: 953 (1546) Tarihli, İstanbul: İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti İstanbul Enstitüsü, 1970
İsmet Kayaoğlu, “Beşir Ağa Vakfi”, Belgeler, 11 (1989), pp. 77–87.
Tietze, Andreas, “Mustafa Ali on Luxury and Status Symbols of Ottoman Gentlemen”, in Aldo Gallota and Ygo Mazarazzi (eds), Studia Turcologica Memoriae Alexi Bombaci Dicta, Naples: Instituto Universitario Orientale, 1982, pp. 577–90
İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, p. 142; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 170–1; Randi Deguilhem, “Wakf”, EI2, XI (2000), pp. 88–9
Bahaeddin Yediyildiz, “Vakif”, İA, 13 (1986), p. 162
Metin Kunt, “The Wakf as in Instrument of Public Policy: Notes on The Köprülü Family Endowments”, in Colin Heywood and Colin Imber (eds), Studies in Ottoman History in Honour of Prof. V. L. Menage, Istanbul: Isis Press, 1994, pp. 189–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Michael Nizri
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nizri, M. (2014). Household Property, Sources of Income, and Economic Activity. In: Ottoman High Politics and the Ulema Household. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326904_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326904_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46004-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32690-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)