Skip to main content

The Life of Feyzullah Efendi: A Typical Rocky Career Path of an Alim

  • Chapter
Ottoman High Politics and the Ulema Household
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout his life Feyzullah Efendi experienced a series of upheavals. His biography exemplifies and explains the basic concepts of the legal-academic establishment of his time, something that is vital for understanding the period and cultural milieu in which he acted. Above all, his personal history is bound up with the processes undergone by the ulema in the 17th and 18th centuries.1 This book will show that Feyzullah followed a rather typical rocky career of progress and delay, together with a major fall from favor. Typically, too, a congruence of events made it possible for him to return to the centers of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For biographical sources on Feyzullah Efendi see, for example, Derin, Feyzullah; Derin and Türek, Hal Tercümesi, I; Idem, Hal Tercümesi, II; Şeyhî, Vekayi, II-III, pp. 247–9; Orhan F. Köprülü, “Feyzullah Efendi”, İA, IV (1948), pp. 593–600

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huriye Gerçek, Feyzullah Efendi ailesi, ecdadi, akrabalari, İstanbul Üniversitesi: Basümamiş Mezuniyet Tezi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Semineri Ktb. Nr. T. 506, İstanbul, 1949–50

    Google Scholar 

  3. Serhan Mehmed Tayşi, “Şeyhü’l-islam Seyyid Feyzullah Efendi ve Feyziyye Medresesi”, Türk Dünyasi Araştirmalari, 23 (1983), pp. 9–100

    Google Scholar 

  4. Müstakimzade Süleyman Sadeddin Efendi, Devhatül-Meşayih, İstanbul: Çağri Yayinlari, 1978, pp. 74–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the Halveti Sufi order and its importance in Ottoman Society see Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 30–6, 139, 165–6; B. G. Martin, “A Short History of the Khalwati Order of Dervishes”, in Nikki R. Keddie (ed.), Scholars, Saints and Sufis: Muslim Religious Institutions in the Middle East Since 1500, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972, pp. 275–305

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Spencer Trimingham, The Sufi Orders in Islam, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 74–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander Knysh, Islamic Mysticism: A Short History, Leiden: Brill, 2000, pp. 264–71

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Curry, The Transformation of Muslim Mystical Thought in the Ottoman Empire: The Rise of the Halveti Order, 1350–1650. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.; Meservey, Feyzullah, p. 33; Yilmaz Öztuna, Devletler ve Hanedanlar: Türkiye (1074–1990), Vol. 2, Ankara: Kültür Bakanliği, 1989, p. 651.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On the role of the judge under the Ottomans see, for example, Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 28–9; Idem, “The Ottoman Ulema”, in Suraiya Faroqhi (ed.), The Cambridge History of Turkey, Vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 213

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaldy Nagy, “Kadi”, EI2, IV (1978), p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 139–43; Cahid Baltaci, XV ve XVI Asirlarda Osmanli Medreseleri, İstanbul: İfran Matbaasi, 1976, pp. 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Selçuk Akşin Somel, The Modernization of Public Education in the Ottoman Empire, 1839–1908, Leiden: Brill, 2001, pp. 17–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.M. Landau, “Kuttab”, EI2, V (1986): 567–70

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 130, 163; Idem, “The İlmiye Registers and the Ottoman Medrese System Prior to the Tanzimat”, in J.-L. Bacque-Grammont and P. Dumont (eds), Collection Turcica III: Contributions a l’histoire economique et sociale de l’Empire Ottoman, Louvain: Editions Peeters, 1983, pp. 319–20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cornell Fleischer, Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire: The Historian Mustafa Ali (1541–1600), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986, pp. 21

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Steve Tamari, “Ottoman Madrasas: The Multiple Lives of Educational Institutions in Eighteenth-Century Syria”, Journal of Early Modern History, 5/1 (2001), p. 110

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katib Çelebi, The Balance of Truth, G. L. Lewis (trans.), London: Allen and Unwin, 1957, pp. 135–41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fleischer, Mustafa Ali, pp. 222–3; Carter V. Findley, Ottoman Civil Officialdom, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989, pp. 54–5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehmet İpşirli, “Scholarship and Intellectual Life in the Reign of Sultan Süleyman the Magnificent”, in Tulay Duran (ed.), The Ottoman Empire in the Reign of Süleyman the Magnificent, Istanbul: Historical Research Foundation Istanbul Research Center, 1988, pp. 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 139, 143; Uğur, The Ottoman Ulema, pp. xxxvii, lii; Findley, Civil Officialdom, p. 55; Çelebi, Balance, pp. 135–43; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, p. 85; Idem, “Elite Circulation in the Ottoman Empire: Great Mollas of the Eighteenth century”, JESHO, 26 (1983), p. 337; Colin Imber, Ebu’s-su’ud: The Islamic Legal Tradition, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For studies on the medrese see, for example, Baltaci, Medreseler; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 139–64; Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 1–81; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 44–101, 204–9; Idem, Registers, pp. 309–27; A. L. Tibawi, “The Origin and the Character of al-Madrasa”, BSOAS, 25/2 (1962), pp. 25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. George Makdisi, The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981, pp. 27–223

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michael Chamberlain, Knowledge and Social Practice in Medieval Damascus, 1190–1350, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 69–90

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Pedersen and others, “Madrasa”, EI2, V (1986), pp. 1123–54

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davud Dursun, Yönetim-Din İlişkileri Açisindan Osmanli Devletinde Siyaset ve Din, second edition, İstanbul: İşaret Yayinlari, 1992, pp. 288–311.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, p. 67; İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, pp. 165–81; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 147–50; İpşirli, Scholarship, p. 18; Marshall G. S. Hodgson, The Venture of Islam, Vol. 3, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1974, p. 123.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Meservey, Feyzullah, p. 158; Tayşi, Feyziyye, pp. 31–3; Köprülü, Feyzullah, p. 599; Murat Akgündüz, Osmanli Devletinde Şeyhülislamlik, Istanbul: Beyan Yayinlari, 2002, pp. 95–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chamberlain, Knowledge and Social Practice, pp. 69–90; Jonathan Berkey, The Transmission of Knowledge in Medieval Cairo, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Robert W. Hefner and Muhammad Qasim Zaman (eds), Schooling Islam, Princeton: Princeton University, 2007, pp. 42–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 24–9; Idem, The Ottoman Ulema, pp. 209–16; İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, pp, 166–71; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 81–3, 90–7; Berkey, Madrasas, pp. 42–5; Atcil, The Route to the Top, pp. 502, 510; U. Heyd and E. Kuran, “Ilmiyye”, EI2, III (1971), pp. 1152–3

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Tayyib Gökbilgin, “Ulema”, İA, 13 (1986), pp. 23–5

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mehmet İpşirli, “The Ottoman Ulema”, In Kemal Çiçek (editor-in-chief), The Great Turkish-Ottoman Civilisation, Vol. 3, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye, 2000, pp. 339–42

    Google Scholar 

  34. Abdülkadir Özcan, (ed.). Kanunname-i Al-i Osman, Istanbul: Kitabevi, 2003, pp. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Although this grade was regularized only under Ahmed III (1703–30), it had been used occasionally since the late 16th century. See Uğur, Ottoman Ulema, pp. xlviii-xlix; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, p. 230; Idem, Registers, p. 313; Itdem, “Sultan Süleyman and the Ottoman Religious Establishment”, in Halil İnalcik and Cemal Kafadar (eds), Süleyman the First and his Time, Istanbul: Isis Press, 1993, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 26, 61; Idem, Circulation, p. 329; Idem, The (Ottoman Ulema, pp. 216–17; Uğur, Ottoman Ulema, pp. xxxix, xli; Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 1–3, 69; Dursun, Siyaset ve Din, pp. 293–5; İnalcik, The Ottoman Empire, pp. 167–8; Atcil, The Route to the Top, pp. 495–6, 500, 510; Baki Tezcan, “The Ottoman Mevali as ‘Lords of the Law’”, Journal of Islamic Studies, 20:3 (2009), p. 394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Derin and Türek, Hal Tercümesi, I, pp. 212–13; Naima, Tarih, VI, p. 5; Defterdar, Zübde, pp. 210–11; Şeyhî, Vekayi, I, pp. 580–1; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 146–58; Semiramis Çavuşoğlu, The Kadizadeli Movement: An Attempt of Şeriat-Minded Reform in the Ottoman Empire, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton, 1990, pp. 150–62; Ahmed Refik, Osmanli Devrinde Hoca Nüfuzu, second edition, İstanbul: Toplumsal Dönüşüm Yayinlari, 1997, pp. 137

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Cavid Baysun, “Mehmed IV”, İA, VII (1960), p. 556.

    Google Scholar 

  39. On the Kadizadelis, see Semiramis, The Kadizadeli Movement; Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, pp. 129–81;Idem, “The Kadizadelis: Discordant Revivalism in Seventeenth century Istanbul”, The Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 45/4 (1986), pp. 251–69; Ahmet Yaşar Ocak, “XVII. Yüzyilda Osmanli İmparatorluğu Dinde Tasfiye Teşebbüslerine Bir Bakiş: Kadizadeliler Hareketi”, Türk Kültürü Araştirmalari, 4 (1983), pp. 208–25

    Google Scholar 

  40. Necati Öztürk, Islamic Orthodoxy among the Ottomans in the Seventeenth Century, with Special Reference to the Qadizade Movement, Boston Spa, England: The British Library, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, p. 57; Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 5–17, 45, 75; Dursun, Siyaset ve Din, pp. 301–3; Baltaci, Medreseler, pp. 31–4; Uğur, Ottoman Ulema, pp. xl-xli; Repp, Mufti, pp. 37, 51; Shahab Ahmed and Nenad Filipovic, “The Sultan’s Syllabus: A Curriculum for the Ottoman Imperial Medreses Systems Prescribed in a Ferman of Qanuni I Süleyman, dated 973 (1565)”, Studia Islamica, 98–9 (2004), pp. 183–218.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ismail. H. Uzunçarşili, Osmanli Tarihi, fifth edition, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, Vol. 3/2, 1995, p. 482.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Derin ve Türek, Hal Tercümesi, I, p. 217; Idem, Hal Tercümesi, II, p. 71; Mehmed Süreyya, Sicill-i Osmanî, Nuri Akbayar (ed.), Vol. 3., İstanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yurt Yayinlari, 1996, pp. 533–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. On the chief military judges of the army see Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 151–60, 177–9; Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society, II, pp. 84–91; Erk, Meşhur, pp. 580–4; Akgündüz, Şeyhülislamlik, pp. 263, 267–8; Zilfi, The Ottoman Ulema, p. 213; Dursun, Siyaset ve Din, pp. 177–80, 270–5; Repp, Mufti, pp. 20–5, 44–5, 51–5; Atcil, The Route to the Top, p. 509; Kaldy Nagy, “Kadi Askar”, EI2, IV (1978), pp. 375–6

    Google Scholar 

  45. On the institution of the Şeyhülislam and its development see Repp, Mufti; Akgündüz, Şeyhülislamlik; Uzunçarşili, İlmiye, pp. 173–214; Refik, Salname, pp. 267–79;Altunsu, Şeyhülislamlar, pp. xxxvii-xlv;Dursun, Siyaset ve Din, pp. 227–85; J. H. Kramers, “Şeyh-ül İslam”, İA, XI (1993), pp. 485–9

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. H. Kramers and R. C. Repp, “Shaykh Al-Islam”, EI2, IX (1996), pp. 399–402

    Google Scholar 

  47. Richard W. Bulliet, “The Shaikh al-Islam and the Evolution of Islamic Society”, Studia Islamica, XXXV (1972), pp. 53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Norman Itzkowitz and Joel Shinder, “The Office of Şhaykh Al-Islam and the Tanzimat: A Prosopographic Enquiry”, MES, 8 (1972), pp. 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  49. Michael M. Pixley, “The Development and Role of the Şeyhülislam in Early Ottoman History”, JAOS, 96 (1976), pp. 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ekrem Kaydu, “Osmanli Devleti’nde Şeyhülislamlik Müessesesinin Ortaya Çikişi”, Erzurum Atatürk Üniversitesi Islamî İlimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (1977), pp. 201–22.

    Google Scholar 

  51. İnalcik, Transformation, pp. 313–23; Suraiya Faroqhi, Akdes Nimet Kurat, “The Retreat of the Turks, 1683–1730”, New Cambridge Modern History, 6 (1970), pp. 618–24

    Google Scholar 

  52. Silahdar, Tarih, II, pp. 483, 569–79; Abou El-Haj, The 1703 Rebellion, p. 47; Cantemir, Growth and Decay, p. 377; M. Tayyib Gökbilgin, “Köprülüler”, İA, 6 (1955), pp. 903

    Google Scholar 

  53. On Sultan Mustafa II see Silahdar, Nusretname, 2 vols; Abou El-Haj, Narcissism, pp. 115–31; Sakaoğlu, Sultanlari, pp. 303–14; Cengiz Orhonlu, “Mustafa II”, İA, 8 (1987), pp. 695–700

    Google Scholar 

  54. On the Treaty of Karlowitz and its ramifications see, for example, Kenneth M. Setton, Venice, Austria and the Turks in the Seventeenth Century, Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1991, pp. 404–12

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rifaat Ali Abou-El-Haj, “Ottoman Attitudes Toward Peace Making: The Karlowitz Case”, Der Islam, 51/1 (1974), pp. 131–7

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hrand D. Andreasyan, “Balatli Georg’a gore Edirne Vak’asi”, Tarih Dergisi, 15 (1960), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zilfi, The Politics of Piety, p. 70; İpşirli, The Ottoman Ulema, p. 342; Ahmet Mumcu, Osmanli Devletinde Siyaseten Katl, Ankara: Ajans-Türk Matbaasi, 1963, pp. 125–31

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rifaat Ali qAbou El-Haj, Formation of the Modern State, New York: New York University Press, 1991, pp. 46–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Nizri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nizri, M. (2014). The Life of Feyzullah Efendi: A Typical Rocky Career Path of an Alim. In: Ottoman High Politics and the Ulema Household. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326904_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326904_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46004-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32690-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics