Advertisement

Feminist Theory and the Critique of Class

  • Robin Truth Goodman

Abstract

From the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, there was a vibrant debate within feminist scholarship in both the humanities and the social sciences about the relationship between Marxist theory and feminism. Following on Juliet Mitchell’s call in the late 1960s for a socialist criticism that took seriously “the subordination of women and the need for their liberation,”1 feminists tried to grapple with concepts like ideology, exchange, labor, and class struggle, and ask if and when they could be applied to oppressions in women’s social conditions, collected under the umbrella term of patriarchy, or if women’s forms of subordination were so culturally specific that they needed their own, independent rubric.2 Feminists also contested that the capitalist-proletariat relationship posed by Marx made class into a singular, overriding, and abstract concept for identity that wiped out both difference and experience. Heidi Hartmann, for example, famously reproves, “the categories of Marxism are sex-blind.”3 In about 1985, such inquiry lost its fervor.

Keywords

Single Mother Feminist Theory Class Struggle Marxist Theory Unpaid Labor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books, 1971, pp. 123–173.Google Scholar
  2. Delphy, Christine. Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression. Trans. Diana Leonard. London: Hutchinson, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. DeParle, Jason. “Two Classes, Divided by ‘I Do’.” The New York Times (July 14, 2012): http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/us/two-classes-in-america-divided-by-i-do.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed: July 31, 2012.
  4. Eisenstein, Hester. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, CO, and London: Paradigm Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. Trans. Alick West (proofed and corrected by Mark Harris, 2010). www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/origin_family.pdf. Accessed: April 1, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Fortunati, Leopoldina. The Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital. Trans. Hilary Creek. Ed. Jim Fleming. New York: Autonomedia, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. Gimenez, Martha E. “Connecting Marx and Feminism in the Era of Globalization: A Preliminary Investigation.” Socialism and Democracy 18, 1 (September 2010): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartmann, Heidi. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union.” In Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Ed. Lydia Sargent. Montreal, QC: Black Rose Books, 1981, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  9. Hartsock, Nancy. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Boulder, CO, and Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Hegewisch, Ariane; Williams, Claudia; and Edwards, Angela. “Insitute for Women’s Policy Research Fact Sheet: The Gender Gap: 2012.” http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/the-gender-wage-gap-2012/. Accessed: March 8, 2013.
  11. Kuhn, Annette. “Structures of Patriarchy and Capital in the Family.” In Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production. London, Henley, UK, and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978, pp. 42–67.Google Scholar
  12. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Second Edition. London and New York: Verso, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Marx, Karl. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Trans. Martin Nicolaus. London and New York: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Marx, Karl; and Engels, Friedrich. “The German Ideology, Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, Second Edition. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1978, pp. 146–200.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell, Juliet. “Women: The Long Revolution.” New Left Review 40 (November—December 1966): 11–37.Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell, Juliet. Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis, New Edition. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  17. Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Towards an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Rayna R. Reiter. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976, pp. 157–210.Google Scholar
  18. Weeks, Kathi. The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolf, Naomi. “The Paycheck Fairness Act’s Realpolitik.” Guardian (June 8, 2012): http:www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/08/paycheck-fairness-act-realpolitik. Accessed: June 10, 2012.Google Scholar
  20. Young, Iris. “Beyond the Unhappy Marriage: A Critique of the Dual Systems Theory.” In Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage ofMarxism and Feminism. Ed. Lydia Sargent. Montreal, QC: Black Rose Books, 1981, pp. 43–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ron Scapp and Brian Seitz 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Truth Goodman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations