Abstract
The letter is possibly a third party account of a representation of the beliefs of the people of Colossae. Concerns were addressed to Epaphras, who relayed them to the writer, who then responded. It is difficult to ascertain the validity of the concerns of the audience, except in trying to identify the people themselves. This book, in its determining the reaction of the first-century audience to the gospel of Jesus Christ presented by the writer of the letter, can only speak to the diversity of the community and by the use of commentaries ascertain that they were a new community of believers presented with doctrines that were not yet fully formed. The labels placed on them by modern commentaries were an injustice in that subsequently their voices were not heard.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
For comprehensive discussions, see Walter Bauer, Robert A. Kraft, and Gerhard Krodel, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity, 1rst paperback ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979, 1996).
Part III Re-Reading Colossians
Homi K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), 5.
John M. G. Barclay, Colossians and Philemon, New Testament Guides (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997), 40.
Copyright information
© 2013 Annie Tinsley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tinsley, A. (2013). General Conclusions. In: A Postcolonial African American Re-reading of Colossians. Postcolonialism and Religions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326157_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326157_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46769-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32615-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)