Skip to main content
  • 319 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter was originally intended to strictly summarize the critical arguments. However, I also discuss in it possible directions for dealing with worthlessness, according to a critical pedagogy logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dianna C. Coben, “Metaphors for an Educative Politics,” in C. Borg, J. Buttigieg, P. Mayo, Gramsci and Education, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002, 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  2. One may fairly argue that rather the extra-formal sphere, as a social sphere, is where the class dynamic of power relationships takes place; and where discrimination, marginalization, racism, and chauvinism flourish. Such an argument was raised by researchers in the late 1980s, against the optimistic assumption of Habermas (Peter Miller, Domination and Power, Routledge, 1987) As regards education, this means that knowing children’s liveliness and vitality is insufficient, as they are placed in advance within a social inequality that informs the dialog with them. Any educational act toward containment and democratization should be based on a political stance aimed at the praxis of social change, in the same important aspects presented in critical pedagogy. While such arguments are crucial, I’ve avoided developing them in the present discussion, because according to my proposed analysis, we must first and foremost enable access to a sphere where the praxis of change can even take place; and the basis for such praxis can be acquaintance with pain and oppression

    Google Scholar 

  3. (Lampert, K., Empathic Education — A Critique of Neocapitalism, Resling, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. W. Apple and J. A. Beane, Democratic Schools, Heinemann, 2nd edition, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Khen Lampert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lampert, K. (2013). The Difficulty of an Alternative. In: Meritocratic Education and Social Worthlessness. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324894_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics