Abstract
Deleuze’s approach to neorealism is unusual. Guided by his unorthodox synthesis of Henri Bergson and Andre Bazin, he does not focus on the documentary techniques or the didactic messages of these films but rather on the new kinds of scenarios they explore — ‘situations which we no longer know how to react to, in spaces which we no longer know how to describe’.1 Neorealism takes these ‘unanswerable situations’ as its basic raw material. Roberto Rossellini’s films are usually associated with the emergence of a new kind of realism that eschews the fantasy space of Hollywood cinema to present life as it really is. It made use of non-professional actors, real locations and no scripts. On this view, it prefigures the French New Wave, cinema verité, various kinds of documentary realism and even newer forms of user-generated media. For Deleuze, however, what matters in neorealism is not any social content, or humanitarian message. Rosselini’s project is not a sociological exercise of providing context to the plight of war orphans and refugees and all the other damaged lives of the post war years. In fact, just the opposite seems to be the case. Neorealism attempts to strip away context and narrative in order to expose the enigmatic quality of a situation, and from there to teach us something about the nature of situations per se. In this way, it realizes the capacity of cinema to teach us something about the most basic properties of kinesis, that is to say, the movement or unfolding of events.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Samuel Weber, Benjamin’s Abilities, Boston: Harvard University Press, 2010, p. 112–113.
Sigfreid Gideon, Mechanization Takes Command: A Contribution to Anonymous History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948.
Walter Benjamin, Understanding Brecht, London: Verso, 1977, p. 11.
Brigid Doherty, ‘Test and Gestus in Brecht and Benjamin’, MLN, 115, 2000, pp. 442–81.
Samuel Weber, Theatricality as Medium, New York: Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 46.
Catherine Mills, The Philosophy of Agamben, Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press, 2008, pp. 127 ff.
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage, 1978, p. 138.
Giorgio Agamben, ‘Notes on Gesture’, in Means without Ends, Minnespolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000, p. 49.
Quoted in Agamben, Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000, p. 79.
Giorgio Agamben, Nudities, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011, p. 85.
Werner Hamacher, ‘Afformative, Strike’, in Walter Benjamin, Philosophy: Destruction and Experience, ed. A. Benjamin and P. Osborne, New York: Routledge, 1994, p. 129.
Giorgio Agamben, ‘The Author as Gesture’, in Profanations, Cambridge: Zone Books, 2007, p. 72.
Kierkegaard, quoted in T.W. Adorno, ‘Chaplin Times Two’, The Yale Journal of Criticism, 9(1), 1996, p. 58.
Heinrich Boll, The Clown, New York: Melville House, 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Stephen Crocker
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crocker, S. (2013). Unanswerable Situations. In: Bergson and the Metaphysics of Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324504_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324504_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45896-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32450-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)