Abstract
The concept of economic transition is certainly not new, although it has been a rare occurrence. When economists referred to transition, it was spoken of for the most part as a theoretical abstract, couched in the language of either evolution, reflecting shifting preferences within a society, or revolution, reflecting exogenous shocks (such as sudden technological change). This approach to economic transition seemed to comport well with economic history, in which truly large systemic transitions were rare, and, even if they caused a sea-change in the way an economy operated (such as the Industrial Revolution), their effects still managed to filter through the system slowly. This reality meant that, unless economists were looking at relationships over hundreds of years (and rarely were data that complete), it was a safe assumption in economic modeling to take the system as a given and leave technological or systemic change as exogenous (or, even better, as in growth models, as the residual that could not be explained).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2013 Christopher A. Hartwell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartwell, C.A. (2013). Two Decades of Transition and Institutional Research: A Review. In: Institutional Barriers in the Transition to Market. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137323712_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137323712_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45874-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32371-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)