Advertisement

Foucault/Paul pp 151-193 | Cite as

Ethical Subjects

  • Sophie Fuggle
Part of the Radical Theologies book series (RADT)

Abstract

To think of power as operating in the gap or, indeed, gaps between what might conventionally be conceived as both divine and human forms of authority and the institutions, practices, and other mechanisms supporting these offers us two distinct possibilities. Is the gap something to be inhabited or something to navigate? Is it a chasm, a gaping hole, or void to be filled? Or, is it a tunnel, pathway, or thread to be followed? From weeping sores and stigmata to hairline fractures leaving imperceptible or near imperceptible scars, this chapter takes up the idea of the gap developed in chapter 3 in order to think critically about how to live and act from within it. In other words, how does Paul define and enact an ethical mode of existence within and through this space or, if you prefer, along this trajectory opened up by the Christ-event? Likewise, what is at stake in Foucault’s late work on care, governmentality, and parrhesia? What possibilities are levered open for radically alternative forms of social existence? And, finally, what might be the implications for a radical ethics that actively critiques the systems, structures, and hierarchies shaping our own sociopolitical moment?

Keywords

Ethical Subject Creative Force Political Theology Homosexual Relation Pastoral Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jean Baudrillard, Forget Foucault, translated by Nicole Dufresne (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2007), 58.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jean Baudrillard, Simulations, translated by Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 1983), 45.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Colin Gordon, “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction,” in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 4.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    In an interview with D. Trombadori for Il Contributo in 1980, Foucault describes how recognizing the creative, inventive possibilities available to those who are able to identify and criticize existing forms of power means that his research is founded on “a postulate of absolute optimism.” Michel Foucault, “Entretien avec Michel Foucault,” DE2, 912 (my translation). However, in another interview given to Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow in 1983, Foucault explains how his “position leads not to apathy but to a hyper-and pessimistic activism.” Michel Foucault, “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of a Work in Progress” in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 232.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Giorgio Agamben, The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Government (Homo Sacer LL, 2), translated by Lorenzo Chiesa (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011), xiii.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    The debate between Schmitt and Petersen emerged as a result of a footnote in Petersen’s Der Monotheisms in which he argued for the theological impossibility of Schmitt’s political theology. This is said to have prompted Schmitt to write Political Theology LL: The Legend of the Elimination of any Kind of Political Theology. Petersen’s claim is based on the theological argument that the eschatological kingdom of God can in no way resemble secular, earthly existence. Striving toward a political Utopia can only ever be commensurate with the coming of the anti-Christ. For a full discussion of the Schmitt-Petersen debate see György Geréby, “Carl Schmitt and Erik Peterson on the Problem of Political Theology: A Footnote to Kantorowicz” in Monotheistic Kingship: The Medieval Variants, edited by Aziz Al-Azmeh and János M. Bak (Budapest: CEU Medievalia, 2004), 31–61.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Brian S. Rosner, Paul, Scripture and Ethics: A Study of 1 Corinthians 5–7 (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1994), 11.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Bengt Holmberg, Paul and Power: The Structure of Authority in the Primitive Church as Reflected in the Pauline Epistles (Lund: CWK Gleerup, 1978), 81.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    For a sustained discussion of the motif of “building up” in Paul, see Valérie Nicolet Anderson, Constructing the Self: Thinking with Paul and Michel Foucault (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012).Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    For a discussion of the complex issue of meat consumption in first-century Greco-Roman society, most notably Corinth, see Justin J. Meggitt, “Meat Consumption and Social Conflict in Corinth,” Journal of Theological Studies, 45.1 (April 1994), 137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 19.
    Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Paul and the Stoics (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    Michel Foucault, “The Minimalist Self: Interview with Stephen Riggins” in Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984 (London and New York, NY: Routledge, 1988), 12.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Todd May, “To Change the World, to Celebrate Life: Merleau-Ponty and Foucault on the Body,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, 31.5–6 (September 2005), 527.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    Todd May, “Philosophy as a Spiritual Exercise in Foucault and Deleuze,” Angelaki, 5.2 (August 2000), 223–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 25.
    Peter Hallward, “Gilles Deleuze and the Redemption from Interest,” Radical Philosophy, 81 (January/February 1997), 8.Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    This is an argument that Hallward goes on to develop extensively in Peter Hallward, Out of this World: Deleuze and the Philiosophy of Creation (London and New York, NY: Verso, 2006), although he does not pursue further comparison with Paul.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    Claire Colebrook, Gilles Deleuze (London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2002), 99.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    Gilles Deleuze, The Logic of Sense, translated by Mark Lester (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1990), 103.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, translated by Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 234ff.Google Scholar
  20. 33.
    Ian Matheson, I am Legend (London: Robinson Publishing, 1987), 150–1.Google Scholar
  21. 35.
    Martin Heidegger, Gesamtausgabe, Bd.1 (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1978), 200.Google Scholar
  22. 36.
    Giorgio Agamben, Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture, translated by Ronald L. Martinez (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), xvi.Google Scholar
  23. 38.
    See, for example, Georges Didi-Huberman, Invention of Hysteria: Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003). I chose this example here because of its important resonances with Foucault’s account of Charcot’s practice in Psychiatric Power.Google Scholar
  24. 39.
    Pliny the Elder, Natural History: A Selection, translated by John F. Healy (London: Penguin Books, 1991), 331–2.Google Scholar
  25. 40.
    See also Newman’s article, “The Sublime is Now” in Barnett Newman: Selected Writings and Interviews, edited by John P. O’Neill (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 170–3, and Jean-François Lyotard’s “Newman: The Instant” in The Inhuman: Reflection on Time (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991), 78–88.Google Scholar
  26. 42.
    Augustine, The Confessions, translated by Albert C. Outler (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2002), Book 13, Chapter 37, 302.Google Scholar
  27. 45.
    For a detailed discussion of Paul’s attitude toward financial assistance see F. Gerald Downing, Cynics and Christian Origins (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1992), 9–17.Google Scholar
  28. 46.
    Abraham J. Malherbe, Paul and the Popular Philosophers (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1989), 47–8.Google Scholar
  29. 47.
    According to Downing, Paul’s Cynic attitude toward the law is most pronounced in Galatians. F. Gerald Downing, Cynics, Paul and the Pauline Churches (London and New York, NY: Routledge, 1998), 74ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sophie Fuggle 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Fuggle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations