Skip to main content

Justice, Sustainability, and Security: An Introduction

  • Chapter
Justice, Sustainability, and Security
  • 627 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of ethical issues in global affairs is self-evident, given the prevalence of human suffering around the world today. According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), about one billion people across the globe are living in extreme poverty, defined as living on less than $1 per day, while according to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), in 2009, about 25 thousand children under the age of five died each day from preventable causes related to poverty. 1 While important progress has been made in the area of “human development” in recent decades, reflecting aggregate improvements in life expectancy, education, income, and literacy, inequality between rich and poor countries continues to deepen, as it does between rich and poor individuals living in almost all of these countries. 2 Furthermore, environmental degradation continues to be a vitally important issue of international affairs as we continue into the twenty-first century, as the poor and disadvantaged are the most vulnerable to the effects of environmental harm. Thus, the UNDP reports that the “continuing failure to reduce the grave environmental risks and deepening social inequalities threatens to slow decades of sustained progress by the world’s poor majority—and even to reverse the global convergence in human development.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World (New York: UNDP, 2008), 25 and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), The State of the World’s Children: Special Edition ( New York: UNICEF, 2009 ), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All ( New York: UNDP, 2011 ), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly-Kate S. Pease, International Organizations, 5th ed. ( New York: Longman, 2012 ), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See generally John Keane, Global Civil Society? ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Willets, ed., “ The Conscience of the World”: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in the UN System ( Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds., The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 ) and Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a brief discussion of this distinction, see Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd rev. ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 240. See also Kimberly Hutchings, Global Ethics: An Introduction ( Cambridge: Polity, 2010 ), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See David Held and Anthony McGrew, Globalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies ( Cambridge: Polity, 2007 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also Chris Brown, “World Society and the English School: An ‘International Society’ Perspective on World Society,” European Journal of International Relations 7, no. 4 (2001): 423–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barry Buzan, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Construction of Globalisation ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Ian Clark, International Legitimacy and World Society ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. In fact, Hans Morgenthau, the father of classical realism, gives a prominent place to ethics and morality, as does another prominent “founding father” of realism, Reinhold Niebuhr. In this sense, the pursuit of power is intimately intertwined with, and colored by, both law and morality. See Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace ,(Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1993), especially Chaps. 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinhold Niebuhr, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics ( Chicago: Scribner and Sons, 1932 )

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greg Russell, Hans J. Morgenthau and the Ethics of American Statecraft ( Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See generally, Michael W. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism ( New York: Norton, 1997 ), 205–315

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scott Burchill et al., “Liberalism,” in Theories of International Relations, 3rd ed. ( New York: Palgrave, 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics ( Cambridge; Cambridge University press, 1999 ), 33

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Samuel Barkin, “Realist-Constructivism,” International Studies Review 5, no. 3 (September 2003): 334–335

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matthew J. Hoffman, “Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?,” International Studies Review 11, no. 2 (2009): 231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. William Bain, “One Order, Two Laws: Recovering the ‘Normative’ in English School Theory,” Review of International Studies 33, no. 4 (2007): 557–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tim Dunne, “The Social Construction of International Society,” European Journal of International Relations 1, no. 3 (1995): 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. See, for example, Chris Brown, International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1993 ), 21–106

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richard Shapcott, Justice, Community, and Dialogue in International Relations ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 ), 30–52

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Janna Thompson, Justice and World Order: A Philosophical Inquiry ( London: Routledge, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Neta Crawford, Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002 )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarah Percy, Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Janice E. Thompson, Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Risse, Ropp, and Sikkink, The Power of Human Rights; Keck and Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders; Richard Price, The Chemical Weapons Taboo ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997 )

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michele M. Betsill and Elisabeth Corell, eds., NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008 ).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richard Price, “Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics,” in Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Richard M. Price, ed. ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 ), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  32. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice , rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, [1971] 1999), 216.

    Google Scholar 

  33. David Easton, A Framework for Political Analysis ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1965 ), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harold Dwight Lasswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How ( New York: P. Smith, 1950 ).

    Google Scholar 

  35. See, for example, George Kennan, Realities of American Foreign Policy ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954 ), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Louis Henkin quotedin William Slomanson, Fundamental Perspectives on International Law, 6th ed. ( Boston: Wadsworth, 2011 ), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984 ), 90.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Murray Forsyth, “The Tradition of International Law,” in Traditions of International Ethics, Terry Nardin and David Mapel, eds. ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 ), 23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. See William W. Fisher III, Morton J. Horowitz, and Thomas A. Reed, eds., American Legal Realism ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1993 )

    Google Scholar 

  40. Michael W. Reisman, “The View from the New Haven School of International Law,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 86 (1992): 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See generally, Alex J. Bellamy, Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq ( Cambridge: Polity, 2006 ).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Henry J. Steiner, Diverse Partners: Non-Governmental Organizations and the Human Rights Movement ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law College, 1991 )

    Google Scholar 

  43. William Korey, NGO’s and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “A Curious Grapevine” ( New York: Palgrave, 2001 )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Michael J. Struett, The Politics of Constructing the International Criminal Court: NGOs, Discourse, and Agency ( New York: Palgrave, 2008 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. See also Price, The Chemical Weapons Taboo andSteve Charnovitz, “Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 100, no. 2 (2006): 338–372.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Claude E. Welch, Jr., ed., NGOs and Human Rights: Promise and Performance ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000 )

    Google Scholar 

  47. See also Sonia Cardenas, Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Marie Tornquist-Chesnier, “NGOs and International Law,” Journal of Human Rights 3, no. 2 (2004): 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. See also David P. Forsythe, The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 ), 242–278.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. See generally, Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights ( London: Polity, 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Isabella D. Bunn, “Linkages between Ethics and International Economic Law,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 19, no. 2 (1998): 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  53. See Burns H. Weston, “Climate Change and Intergenerational Justice: Foundational Reflections,” Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 9 (2008): 375–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. World Commission on Environment and Development (“Brundtland Commission”), Our Common Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gary King and Christopher J. L. Murray, “Rethinking Human Security,” Political Science Quarterly 116, no. 4 (2001–2002): 588.

    Google Scholar 

  56. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 1994 ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1994 ), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See especially, Roland Paris, “Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?,” International Security 26, no. 2 (2001): 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Eric A. Heinze

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heinze, E.A. (2013). Justice, Sustainability, and Security: An Introduction. In: Heinze, E.A. (eds) Justice, Sustainability, and Security. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322944_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics