Skip to main content

Linking Together Theory and Practice: A Framework for Evaluating Political Knowledge

  • Chapter
The Conception of Citizen Knowledge in Democratic Theory

Part of the book series: The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy ((PSTCD))

  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 4 extends the book beyond reviewing existing literature by providing an analytical framework for the empirical measurement of political knowledge. The framework is based on the argument that different conceptions of democracy assign different roles to the citizen in terms of their participation in politics. Consequently they expect different things in terms of what the citizen is expected to know about politics. The measurement of knowledge should therefore depend on what type of democracy is being studied.

The framework offers a five-step method for arriving at an empirical indicator of knowledge, which is based on an explicit connection between conception of democracy, citizen involvement and knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Lauri Rapeli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rapeli, L. (2014). Linking Together Theory and Practice: A Framework for Evaluating Political Knowledge. In: The Conception of Citizen Knowledge in Democratic Theory. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322869_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics