Abstract
In this chapter, I wish to examine John Stuart Mill’s concept of liberty as it emerges especially from On Liberty (1859) in the light of Isaiah Berlin’s and Quentin Skinner’s interpretations. Mill’s view of liberty as absence of constraints in self-regarding actions has been hailed by Berlin as the quintessential notion of “negative liberty” (an expression originally coined by Samuel Pufendorf and then used by Jeremy Bentham).1 On the other hand, Skinner has emphasized Mill’s belief that a minimum level of interference from the government, together with a maximum of social tolerance, was needed to promote “individuality” and “eccentricity"; in this respect Mill’s view of liberty cannot be described as merely negative for it has a positive goal. After examining the respective merits of their interpretations, I conclude that both Berlin and Skinner had a political agenda in their interpretation of Mill which was dictated by the practical circumstances as well as by their different interpretative sensibilities. What emerges clearly from this comparison and study in reception is the complexity and comprehensiveness of Mill’s notion of liberty, which cannot be easily pinpointed and hastily attributed to a political or philosophical camp: according to the aspects of his thought emphasized by the authors, Mill’s concept of liberty can be characterized either as “negative” or as “positive.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bellamy, R. (1992) ‘T.H. Green, J.S. Mill, and Isaiah Berlin on the Nature of Liberty and Liberalism,’ in Jurisprudence: Cambridge Essays, eds H. Gross and R. Harrison (Oxford-New York: Clarendon Press): 257–85.
Bellamy, R. (1999) Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise (London and New York: Routledge).
Berlin, I. (1969) Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Berlin, I. (1997) The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays, ed. H. Hardy and R. Hausheer (London: Chatto & Windus).
Berlin, I. (2002) Liberty, ed. H. Hardy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Bosanquet, B. (1899) The Philosophical Theory of the State, 2nd edn (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1910).
Cohen, M. (1960) ‘Berlin and the Liberal Tradition,’ The Philosophical Quarterly 10 (40): 216–27.
Cowling, M. (1963) Mill and Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Gray, J.N. (1980) ‘On Positive and Negative Liberty,’ Political Studies 28 (4): 507–26.
Gray, J.N. (1983) Mill on Liberty. A Defence (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Green, T.H. (1886) ‘The Different Senses of ‘Freedom’ as Applied to Will and the Moral Progress of Man,’ in The Works of Thomas Hill Green, ed. R.L. Nettleship, 3 vols. (London: Longmans, Green): II.308–33.
Green, T.H. (1986) Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, ed. P. Harris and J. Morrow (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Green, T.H. (1991) ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract,’ in Liberty, ed. D. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 21–32.
Kenny, M. (2000) ‘Isaiah Berlin’s Contribution to Modern Political Theory,’ Political Studies 48 (5): 1026–39.
Letwin, S.R. (1965) The Pursuit of Certainty: David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Beatrice Webb (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Long, D.G. (1977) Bentham on Liberty: Jeremy Bentham’s Idea of Liberty in Relation to his Utilitarianism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
MacCallum, G.C. (1967) ‘Negative and Positive Freedom,’ Philosophical Review 76 (3): 312–34.
MacFarlane, L.J. (1966) ‘On Two Concepts of Liberty,’ Political Studies 14 (1): 77–81.
Matteucci, N. (1972) Il liberalismo in un mondo in trasformazione (Bologna: II Mulino).
Polanowska-Sygulska, B. (1989) ‘One Voice More on Berlin’s Doctrine of Liberty,’ Political Studies 37 (1): 123–7.
Pufendorf, S. (2002) The Divine Feudal Law: Or, Covenants with Mankind, Represented (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1st edn 1695).
Rees, J. (1966) ‘Was Mill for Liberty,’ Political Studies 14 (1): 72–7.
Rosen, F. (2003) Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill (London: Routledge).
Ryan, A., ed. (1979) The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isaiah Berlin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Sidgwick, H. (1897) Elements of Politics (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
Skinner, Q. (1984) ‘The Idea of Negative Liberty. Philosophical and Historical Perspectives,’ in Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, eds R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 193–221.
Skinner, Q. (1985) The Paradoxes of Political Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Skinner, Q. (1993) ‘The Republicanism of Political Liberty,’ in Machiavelli and Republicanism, eds G. Bock, Q. Skinner, M. Viroli (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 293–309.
Skinner, Q. (1998) Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Skinner, Q. (2002a) ‘A Third Concept of Liberty,’ in Proceedings of the British Academy CXVII: 237–68.
Skinner, Q. (2002b) Visions of Politics, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Stephen, J.F. (1993) Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).
Talmon, J.L. (1952) The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy (London: Secker & Warburg).
Taylor, C. (1979) ‘What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty,’ in The Idea of Freedom, ed. A. Ryan (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 175–93.
Tocqueville, A. (1835–40) Democracy in America, eds H.C. Mansfield and D. Winthrop (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).
Weinstein, W.L. (1965) ‘The Concept of Liberty in Nineteenth Century English Political Thought,’ Political Studies 13 (2): 145–62.
Wollheim, R. (1979) ‘John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin,’ in The Idea of Freedom, ed. A. Ryan (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 153–69.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Giovanni Giorgini
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giorgini, G. (2013). Three Visions of Liberty: John Stuart Mill, Isaiah Berlin, Quentin Skinner. In: Demetriou, K.N., Loizides, A. (eds) John Stuart Mill. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321718_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321718_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35041-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32171-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)