Abstract
The smell of rotting corpses fills the world of Endgame, just as the image of burning flesh haunts the landscape of Happy Days. As in many of Beckett’s works, the human body in these early plays seems to be under an inexplicable attack, its form imprisoned, its parts dismembered. Just as the human form in Endgame is imprisoned by immobility and blindness, repetition and sterility, Happy Days dramatizes the human body in its slow and agonizing return to dust. In Winnie’s case, this display of the human form is first a presence, and then increasingly an absence, as her body is gradually transformed into earth. Beckett forces the viewer to acknowledge corporeality so that he can push toward its ultimate disappearance, for the smell of rotting and burning flesh in the early plays points to the ultimate destruction of that flesh in the late plays. Thus, the human body is slowly erased and dismembered, part by part, as his canon progresses. 1 As Beckett stated in an interview, “My people seem to be falling to bits.”
Golden lads and girls all must, As chimney sweepers, come to dust.
—Cymbeline 4.2.262–263
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Marguerite Tassi, “Shakespeare and Beckett Revisited: A Phenomenology of Theater,” Comparative Drama 31 (1997): 253.
Israel Shenker, “Moody Man of Letters,” New York Times , May 6, 1956, Sec. 2, p. 3.
Herbert Blau, “A Subtext based on Nothing,” Tulane Drama Review 8 (1963): 125.
Charles Marowitz, “Lear Log,” Tulane Drama Review 8 (1963): 104.
Dougald McMillan and Martha Fehsenfield, Beckett in the Theatre (London: Riverrun Press, 1988), 171.
Samuel Beckett, Proust (New York: Grove Press, 1931), 4.
See Graley Herren, Samuel Beckett’s Plays on Film and Television (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 7.
Israel Shenker, “An Interview with Beckett,” in Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage, ed. Lawrence Graver and Raymond Federman (London: Routledge, 1979), 148.
Samuel Beckett, Proust and Three Dialogues (London: Calder and Boyars, 1970), 103.
Antonia Rodriguez-Gago, “Molly’s ‘Happy Nights’ and Winnie’s ‘Happy Days,’” in The Theatrical Gamut: Notes for a Post-Beckettian Stage , ed. Enoch Brater (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995), 39.
Copyright information
© 2013 Sonya Freeman Loftis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loftis, S.F. (2013). “Some remains”: Forgetting Shakespeare in Endgame and Happy Days. In: Shakespeare’s Surrogates. Reproducing Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321374_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321374_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46926-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32137-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)