Skip to main content

“Some remains”: Forgetting Shakespeare in Endgame and Happy Days

  • Chapter
Shakespeare’s Surrogates

Part of the book series: Reproducing Shakespeare ((RESH))

  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

The smell of rotting corpses fills the world of Endgame, just as the image of burning flesh haunts the landscape of Happy Days. As in many of Beckett’s works, the human body in these early plays seems to be under an inexplicable attack, its form imprisoned, its parts dismembered. Just as the human form in Endgame is imprisoned by immobility and blindness, repetition and sterility, Happy Days dramatizes the human body in its slow and agonizing return to dust. In Winnie’s case, this display of the human form is first a presence, and then increasingly an absence, as her body is gradually transformed into earth. Beckett forces the viewer to acknowledge corporeality so that he can push toward its ultimate disappearance, for the smell of rotting and burning flesh in the early plays points to the ultimate destruction of that flesh in the late plays. Thus, the human body is slowly erased and dismembered, part by part, as his canon progresses. 1 As Beckett stated in an interview, “My people seem to be falling to bits.”

Golden lads and girls all must, As chimney sweepers, come to dust.

Cymbeline 4.2.262–263

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Marguerite Tassi, “Shakespeare and Beckett Revisited: A Phenomenology of Theater,” Comparative Drama 31 (1997): 253.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Israel Shenker, “Moody Man of Letters,” New York Times , May 6, 1956, Sec. 2, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herbert Blau, “A Subtext based on Nothing,” Tulane Drama Review 8 (1963): 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Marowitz, “Lear Log,” Tulane Drama Review 8 (1963): 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dougald McMillan and Martha Fehsenfield, Beckett in the Theatre (London: Riverrun Press, 1988), 171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Samuel Beckett, Proust (New York: Grove Press, 1931), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Graley Herren, Samuel Beckett’s Plays on Film and Television (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Israel Shenker, “An Interview with Beckett,” in Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage, ed. Lawrence Graver and Raymond Federman (London: Routledge, 1979), 148.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Samuel Beckett, Proust and Three Dialogues (London: Calder and Boyars, 1970), 103.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Antonia Rodriguez-Gago, “Molly’s ‘Happy Nights’ and Winnie’s ‘Happy Days,’” in The Theatrical Gamut: Notes for a Post-Beckettian Stage , ed. Enoch Brater (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995), 39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Sonya Freeman Loftis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loftis, S.F. (2013). “Some remains”: Forgetting Shakespeare in Endgame and Happy Days. In: Shakespeare’s Surrogates. Reproducing Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321374_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics