Skip to main content

What My Dog Can Do: On the Effect of The Wealth of Nations I.ii.2

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics ((AIEE))

Abstract

In the midst of one of the most famous passages in The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith writes ‘nobody ever saw a dog make a fair and deliberate exchange of one bone for another with another dog’ (WN I.ii.2).1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bekoff, M. (1995). ‘Play Signals as Punctuation: the Structure of Social Play in Canids’, Behaviour, 132(5): 419–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breig, J. (Autumn 04). ‘The Eighteenth Century Goes to the Dogs’, Colonial Williamsburg. Available at: http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/autumn04/dogs.cfm.

  • Calicott, J. B. (1992). ‘Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Back Together Again’, in E. C. Hargrove (ed.) The Animal Rights Environmental Ethics Debate: The Environmental Perspective (Albany: State University of New York Press), pp. 249–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man (London: John Murray).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman-Barzilai, F. (2010). Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, A. (2007). ‘Francis Hutcheson and the Origin of Animal Rights’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göçmen, D. (2007). The Adam Smith Problem Reconciling Human Nature and Society in ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’ and Wealth of Nations (London; Gordonsville: Tauris Academic Studies)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, C. L. (2000). ‘Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61(3): 714–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. (2010). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: why it’s so hard to think straight about animals (New York: Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, E. (2009). Nim Chimpsky: the chimp who would be human (New York: Bantam Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancilla, A. (2009). ‘Nonhuman Animals in Adam Smith’s Moral Theory’, Between the Species, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, P. B. (2003). The Other End of the Leash: why we do what we do around dogs (New York: Ballantine Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1984). Animals and Why They Matter (Athens: University of Georgia Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes, L. (2004). Adam Smith in Context: a critical reassessment of some central components of his thought (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974). ‘What it’s like to be a Bat’, The Philosophical Review, 83(4): 435–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieli, R. (1986). ‘Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 47(4): 611–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otteson, J. R. (2002). Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J. (2012). Dogs of the 18th Century. The 18th — Century Common. Available at: http://www.18thcenturycommon.org/dogs-of-the-18th-century/.

  • Rowlands, M. (2012). Can Animals be Moral? (Oxford;New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (2005). Anthropocentrism and its Discontents: the moral status of animals in the history of Western philosophy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. R. (2013). Adam Smith’s Pluralism: rationality, education, and the moral sentiments (New Haven: Yale Univesity Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. R. (2011). ‘Review Essay: Adam Smith: The Rhetoric of Propriety by Stephen J. McKenna; Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture by Jerry Evensky; and The Adam Smith Problem: Reconciling Human Nature and Society in the Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations by Dogan Göçmen’, Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 34(3): 403–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolloch, N. (2013). ‘Adam Smith’s economics and ethical consideration of animals’, History of the Human Sciences, 26(3): 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Jack Russell Weinstein

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinstein, J.R. (2014). What My Dog Can Do: On the Effect of The Wealth of Nations I.ii.2. In: Hardwick, D.F., Marsh, L. (eds) Propriety and Prosperity. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321053_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics