Abstract
In recent decades, literary criticism, art and film criticism have been dominated by formalist, psychoanalytical and cultural studies approaches; but since the 1980s, many disciplines — from economics to political science, philosophy, psychology, history, law, biology and the neurosciences — have taken an affective turn which guided my perspective in this book. The great variety of affective phenomena (emotions, sentiments, moods and feelings) has been the object of many definitions, investigations, hypotheses and experimental tests in questionnaires and brain-imaging. Topics which have always been common in novels, dramas and films — ambition, love, jealousy, regret, remorse, resentment, rage, trust, nostalgia, disgust and fear — have come to figure in many fields of knowledge; some analytical philosophers and psychologists have studied the emotions elicited by the arts. The research in affective phenomena implies the exploration of the mind and, drawing from the cognitive sciences, has refined the hard cognitivist approaches of the 1970s and has rejected the separation established by Emmanuel Kant between reason (Vernunft) and the emotions (Seele). This division has been dominant in Western thought and reinforced by most Romantic authors and thinkers, with some important exceptions. Traces of the dualist conception are visible in the rejection of reason and the logos that has been fashionable in literary theory since the late 1960s.
[…] but when the New Age is at leisure to Pronounce; all will be set right: & those Grand Works of the more ancient & consciously & professedly Inspired Men, will hold their proper rank, & the Daughters of Memory shall become the Daughters of Inspiration.
William Blake, Milton. A Poem in Two Books
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See David Bloch (2007) Aristotle on Memory and Recollection: Text, Translation, Interpretation, and Reception in Western Scholasticism (Leiden: Koninglijke Brill NV), pp. 53–117.
He refutes Richard Sorabji’s view, ed. (1972) Aristotle. On Memory (Providence: Brown University).
See John Lyons (1999) ‘Descartes and Modern Imagination’, Philosophy and Literature 23.2, 302–312.
See Endel Tulving (1983) Elements of Episodic Memory (Oxford: Clarendon Press); (2002) ‘Episodic Memory: From Mind to Brain’ Annual Review of Psychology 53, 1–25.
Daniel Schacter and Endel Tulving eds. (1994) Memory Systems (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
See Daniel Schacter (1996) Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past (New York: BasicBooks); (2002) The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).
See also Morris Moscovitch (1994) ‘Cognitive Resources and Dual-task Interference at Retrieval in Normal People: The Role of Frontal Lobes and Medial Temporal Cortex’, Neuropsychology 8, 524–534; (1997) ‘Memory Consolidation, Retrograde Amnesia and the Hippocampal Complex’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 7, 217–227. Greg Miller (2007) ‘A Surprising Connection between Memory and Imagination’, Science 19 January, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/315/5810/312.summary. Accessed 20 April 2012.
Charles Baudelaire (1965) ‘The Salon of 1846’ in Art in Paris 1845–1862 trans. and ed. Jonathan Mayne (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), p. 94. He also distinguishes between a memory of the hand and a memory of the brain, ‘manual rather than intellectual’, p. 92. Hereafter AP.
Julien Zanetta (2012) ‘Le chic, la mémoire et l’imagination’, L’année Baudelaire 15, 102–122. In his dissertation at the University of Geneva, Zanetta studies the various forms of memory in Baudelaire and the devel-opment of his conceptions from 1846 to 1862.
Sergei Eisenstein (1984) ‘Diderot a parlé de cinéma’, Europe (Issue: ‘Diderot’), pp. 135–150. Eisenstein wrote this article in 1943. See Jean-Claude Bonnet (1995) ‘Diderot a inventé le cinéma’, Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie 18, 27–33; Roland Barthes (1977) ‘Diderot, Brecht, Eisenstein’ in Image Music Text. Essays selected and trans. Steven Heath (Hammersmith, London: Fontana Press), pp. 70–71.
Stanley Cavell (1979, first ed. 1971) The World Viewed (Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press), p. 43.
Charles Baudelaire (1965) The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays trans. and ed. Jonathan Mayne (London: Pahidon Press), p. 15. Hereafter PML. I discussed the theme of memory and imagination in Patrizia Lombardo (1997) ‘Baudelaire et le beau mensonge de la peinture’ in Le Beau Mensonge (Rabat: Université Mohammed V, Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines), pp. 63–86.
See Kendall Walton (1990) Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press);
Noël Carroll (2002) ‘The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60/1, 3–26.
Ronald de Sousa (2005) ‘The Art of the Possible in Life and Literature’ in Experience and Analysis, ed. M. E. Reicher and J. C. Marek (Vienna: htp-öbv), p. 349.
David Bordwell (1982) Narration in the Fiction Film (Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press), p. 88.
David Bordwell (2007) Poetics of Cinema (Routledge: New York and Oxon), p. 23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Patrizia Lombardo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lombardo, P. (2014). Introduction. In: Memory and Imagination in Film. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319432_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319432_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31743-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31943-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)