Abstract
This chapter discusses the meaning of the output trends examined in the analysis of growth and their relation to actual levels of output and income. These issues are seldom explicitly examined in the literature, where the relation between actual and theoretical magnitudes assumed in the theory of prices appears to be automatically extended to the magnitudes addressed by theories of growth. In field of economic growth, however, the distinction between actual and theoretical magnitudes overlaps with the distinction between cyclical and trend positions of the economy. This gives rise to crucial misunderstandings, at least from the standpoint adopted here.
I am grateful to R. Ciccone and P. Trabucchi for useful and interesting discussions and to an anonymous referee for the comments on a first version of the chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bilancini, E. and Petri, F. (2008) ‘The dynamic of general equilibrium: a comment on Professor Gintis’, Quaderno del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, no. 538, Università di Siena.
Bortis, H. (1997) Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory - A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Bronzi, M. (2012) ‘Il nesso di causalità tra ciclo economico e trend: le teorie del ciclo reale e le teorie della domanda’, Doctoral thesis in political economy, Università di Roma Tre.
Ciccone, R. (1986) ‘Accumulation and capacity utilization: some critical considerations on Joan Robinson’s Theory of Distribution’, Political Economy, 1: 17–36.
Friedman, M. (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Garegnani, P. (1962) Il problema della domanda effettiva nello sviluppo economico italiano Roma: Svimez.
Garegnani, P. (1978–79) ‘Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand: I and II’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2(4) and 3(1): 335–53, 62–82.
Garegnani, P. (1983) ‘Two Routes to Effective Demand’, in J. A. Kregel (ed.), Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations (London: Macmillan): pp. 69–80.
Garegnani, P. (1984) ‘Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx’, in Oxford Economic Papers, 36(2): 291–325.
Garegnani, P. (1992) ‘Some Notes for an Analysis of Accumulation’, in J. Halevi, D. Laibman and E. Nell (eds), Beyond the Steady State: A Revival of Growth Theory (Basingstoke and London: MacMillan).
Garegnani, P. and Palumbo, A. (1998) ‘Accumulation of Capital’, in N. Salvadori and H. D. Kurz (eds), The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).
Garegnani, P. and Trezzini, A. (2010) ‘Cycles and growth: a source of demand- driven endogenous growth’, Review of Political Economy, 22(1): 119–25.
Goodwin, R. M. (1967) ‘A Growth Cycle’, in C. H. Feinstein (ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Haberler, G. (1938) Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis, League of Nations, Geneva.
Harrod, R. F. (1939) ‘An Essay in Dynamic Theory’, Economic Journal, 49(193): 14–33.
Kaldor, N. (1951) ‘Mr. Hicks on the Trade Cycle’, Economic Journal, LXI, December: 833–47.
Kaldor, N. (1954) ‘The relation of economic growth and cyclical fluctuations’, Economic Journal, 64: 53–71.
Kaldor, N. (1957) ‘A model of economic growth’, Economic Journal, 67(268): 591–624.
Kalecki, M. (1968) ‘Trend and the business cycle’, Economic Journal, 78: 263–76.
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: MacMillan).
Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954) ‘Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data’, in K.K. Kurihara (ed.), Post- Keynesian Economics (London: Allen & Unwin).
Palumbo, A. and Trezzini, A. (2003) ‘Growth without normal capacity utilization’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 10: 109–35.
Serrano, F. (1995) ‘Long-period effective demand and the Sraffian supermultiplier’, Contributions to Political Economy, 14: 67–90.
Smithies, A. (1957) ‘Economic fluctuations and growth’, Econometrica, 25(1): 1–52.
Trezzini, A. (1995) ‘Capacity utilization in the long run and the autonomous components of aggregate demand’, Contributions to Political Economy, 14: 33–66.
Trezzini, A. (1998) ‘Capacity utilization in the long run: some further considerations’, Contributions to Political Economy, 17: 53–67.
Trezzini, A. (2011a) ‘The irreversibility of consumption as a source of endogenous demand-driven economic growth’, Review of Political Economy, 23(4), 537–56.
Trezzini, A. (2011b) ‘Steady State and the Analysis of Long-Run Tendencies: The Case of Neo-Kaleckian Models’, in R. Ciccone, C. Gehrke and G. Mongiovi (eds), Sraffa and Modern Economics, Vol. II (London and New York: Routledge): pp. 129–51.
Vianello, F. (1985) ‘The Pace of Accumulation’, Political Economy, 1(1): 69–87.
White, G. (2006) ‘Demand-led growth and the Classical Approach to Value and Distribution: Are they Compatible?’, in N. Salvadori (ed.), Economic Growth and Distribution: On the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations (Aldershot: Edward Elgar): pp. 148–78.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trezzini, A. (2013). The Meaning of Output Trends in the Analysis of Growth. In: Levrero, E.S., Palumbo, A., Stirati, A. (eds) Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume Two. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319166_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319166_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34703-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31916-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)