Skip to main content

Abstract

British Sociology was at the forefront of developing social studies to define, map and itemise poverty. Two studies, surveys carried out by Charles Booth in London and by Seebohm Rowntree in York in the late nineteenth century, revolutionised poverty research and the conduct of the social survey. They introduced new ways of conducting social observation and evaluation of the economic conditions of the working classes that were to change the way that social surveys were carried out and the definition and measurement of poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abel-Smith, B. and Townsend, P. (1965) The Poor and the Poorest, Occasional Papers on Social Administration 17. London: G. Bell & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R.E. and Hatton, T.J. (2000) ‘Seebohm Rowntree and the Post-War Poverty Puzzle’, Economic History Review 53: 517–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, K. (1999) ‘Popular Reactions To Sociological Research: The Case of Charles Booth’, Sociology 33(1): 153–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1942) Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C. (1903) The Life and Labour of the People in London, 17 vols, 1892–1902. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth (2012) ‘Charles Booth and the Survey into Life and Labour in London (1886–1903)’: Online Archive, http://booth.lse.ac.uk/, accessed 5 December 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowley, A.L. and Burnett-Hurst, A.R. (1915) Livelihood and Poverty: A Study in the Economic Conditions of Working Class Households in Northampton, Warrington, Stanley and Reading. London: G. Bell & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowley, A.L. and Hogg, M.H. (1925) Has Poverty Diminished?. London: P.S. King and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, H. (1903) ‘The “Poverty Line”’, Charity Organisation Review 8(78): 321–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A. (1961) A Study of the Work of Seebohm Rowntree1871–1954. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, T. (2008) Time and Income Poverty. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, E., Matheson, M.C. and Shann, G. (1908) Women’s Work and Wages, 2nd edition. London: Fisher Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradog Jones, D. (1934) The Social Survey of Merseyside. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, E. and Flinn, M.W. (1965) Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, K. and Silburn, R. (1970) Poverty: The Forgotten Englishmen. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A.I. and Kotz, S. (2011) Arthur L. Bowley: A Pioneer in Modern Statistics and Economics. London: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.F. (1909) Life in an English Village: An Economic and Historical Survey of the Parish of Corsley in Wiltshire. London: T. Fisher Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1942) The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844. With a Preface Written in 1892, trans. Florence Kelley Wischnewetzky. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, P. (1934) Work and Wealth in a Modern Port: An Economic Survey of Southampton. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R.F. (1937) ‘A New Calculation of the Poverty Line’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 100: 74–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, T.J. (1998) Rowntree’s ‘Life Cycle of Poverty’ in Interwar London, Institute for Labour Research Discussion Paper 98/21. Colchester: University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, T.J., et al. (1999) New Survey of London Life and Labour, 1929–1931 [computer file], 2nd edition. Colchester: UK Data Archive [distributor], March 1999, SN: 3758, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-3758–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennock, E.P. (1991) ‘Concepts of Poverty in the British Social Surveys from Charles Booth to Arthur Bowley’, in M. Bulmer, K. Bales and K. Kish Sklar (eds), The Social Survey in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn Smith, H. (1930–35) The New Survey of London Life and Labour. London: P.S. King & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynes, T. (1963) ‘National Assistance and National Prosperity’, Occasional Papers on Social Administration. London: Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1974) The Sociology of Housework. London: Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. (2004) Eleanor Rathbone and the Politics of Conscience. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pember Reeves, M. (1979) Round About a Pound a Week. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piachaud, David. (1981) Peter Townsend and the Holy Grail’, New Society 57: 419–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L (2004) Discovering Child Poverty: The Creation of a Policy Agenda. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L. (2006) ‘Helen Bosanquet’, in J. Scott (ed.), 50 Key Sociologists: The Formative Theorists. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbone, E. (1927) The Ethics and Economics of Family Endowment. London: Epworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. (1902) Poverty: A Study of Town Life, 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. (1918) The Human Needs of Labour. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. (1937) The Human Needs of Labour, revised edition. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. (1942) Poverty and Progress: A Second Social Survey of York. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. and Lavers, G.R. (1951) Poverty and the Welfare State: A Third Social Survey of York Dealing Only with Economic Questions. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tout, H. (1938) The Standard of Living in Bristol. Bristol: Arrowsmith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1954) ‘Measuring Poverty’, The British Journal of Sociology 5(2): 130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1986) ‘Paradigms of Poverty: A Rehabilitation of B.S. Rowntree’, Journal of Social Policy 15: 69–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1992) ‘Muddle or Mendacity? The Beveridge Committee and the Poverty Line’, Journal of Social Policy 22: 269–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, C. and Pahl, J. (1994). ‘Money, Power and Inequality within Marriage’, Sociological Review 42: 263–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn D.C. (1962) ‘Poverty in Britain Today: The Evidence’, Sociological Review 10(3): 257–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Lucinda Platt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Platt, L. (2014). Poverty Studies and Social Research. In: Holmwood, J., Scott, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sociology in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318862_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics