Advertisement

Unattainable Desires? Childbearing Capabilities in Early 21st-Century Hungary

  • Judit Takács
Chapter
Part of the Work and Welfare in Europe book series (RECOWE)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the issue of weak capabilities for having and caring for children in Budapest as being reflected by the views of 100 working parents on their fertility-related desires. Capabilities are understood as the freedom to achieve valued functionings; in our case that is the parents’ notions of the real opportunities they have regarding the (family) life they may lead (Sen, 1987), more specifically, being a working parent with as many children as they would like to have. The aim of my study is to highlight the many ways in which Hungarian parents’ fertility-related capabilities are constrained, which can be detected not only in their achieved fertility, but also already at the level of their desired family size.

Keywords

Ideal Number Parental Leave Fertility Desire Life Balance Desire Family Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bálint, M. and J. Köllő (2008) ‘The Labour Supply Effect of Maternity Benefits’, in K. Fazekas, Zs. Cseres-Gergely and Á. Scharle (eds) The Hungarian Labour Market. Review and Analysis 2008 (Budapest: Institute of Economics, HAS — Hungarian Employment Foundation), 53–71.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  3. Bettelheim, B. (1987) A Good Enough Parent: A Book on Child-Rearing (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
  4. Blaskó, Zs. (2005) ‘Dolgozzanak-e a nők? A magyar lakosság nemi szerepekkel kapcsolatos véleményének változásai’ 1988, 1994, 2002’ [Should Women Work? Changes in the Gender Role-related Views of the Hungarian Population, 1988, 1994, 2002], Demográfia, 48(2–3), 159–186.Google Scholar
  5. Blaskó, Zs. (2009) ‘Családtámogatás, gyermeknevelés, munkavállalás’ [Family Support, Childrearing, Employment], Demográfiai Portré 2009, 41–51.Google Scholar
  6. Bradatan, C. and G. Firebaugh (2007) ‘History, Population Policies, and Fertility Decline in Eastern Europe: A Case Study’, Journal of Family History, 32 (2), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bukodi, E. (2006) ‘Women’s Labour Market Participation and Use of Working Time’, in I. Nagy, M. Pongrácz and I. Gy. Tóth (eds) Changing Roles. Report on the Situation of Women and Men in Hungary 2005 (Budapest: TÁRKI Social Research Institute), 15–55.Google Scholar
  8. Cliquet, R. (2003) Major Trends Affecting Families in the New Millennium: Western Europe and North America in Major Trends Affecting Families: A Background Document. Prepared by the Programme on the Family (New York: United Nations), 1–26.Google Scholar
  9. Eurostat (2010) Live Births Outside Marriage, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/dataset?p_product_ code=TPS00018 (accessed 18 January 2009).Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat (2011) Labour Force Survey, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/dat a/database (accessed 8 August 2009).Google Scholar
  11. Frejka, T. (2008) ‘Determinants of Family Formation and Childbearing during the Societal Transition in Central and Eastern Europe’, Demographic Research, 19 (7), 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey, M. (2009) ‘Nok és férfiak a munkaeropiacon — a Lisszaboni Növekedési és Foglalkoztatási Stratégia céljainak a tukrében’, [Men and Women in the Labour Market] in I. Nagy and T. Pongrácz (eds) Szerepváltozások. Jelentés a nok és a férfiak helyzetérol 2009 [Changing Roles. Report on the Situation of Women and Men in Hungary 2009] (Budapest: TÁRKI Zrt. — Szociális és Munkaugyi Minisztérium), 27–51.Google Scholar
  13. Gábos, A. and P. Szivós (2002) ‘A jövedelmi szegénység alakulása, a gyermekes családok helyzete’ [Income Poverty and the Situation of Families with Children], in T. Kolosi, I. Gy. Tóth and G. Vukovich (eds) Társadalmi riport [Social Report] (Budapest: TÁRKI),. 42–59.Google Scholar
  14. Gábos, A. and P. Szivós (2008) ‘Lent és még lejjebb: jövedelmi szegénység’ [Down and Deeper Down — Income Poverty], in P. Szivós and I. Gy. Tóth (eds) Köz, teher, elosztás [Distri-Burden] (Budapest: TÁRKI Monitor Jelentések 2008), 39–49.Google Scholar
  15. Gal, S. and G. Kligman (eds) (2000) Reproducing Gender. Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Goldstein, J. R., W. Lutz and M. R. Testa (2003) ‘The Emergence of SubReplacement Fertility Ideals in Europe’, Population Research and Policy Review, 22 (5–6), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagewen, K. J. and S. P. Morgan (2005) ‘Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970–2002’, Population and Development Review, 31 (3), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hajnal, J. (1965) ‘European Marriage Patterns in Perspective’, in V. Glass and D. E. C. Eversley (eds) Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography (London: Edward Arnold), 101–143.Google Scholar
  19. Havasi, É. (2008) ‘Nem csak a pénz: megélhetési nehézségek, anyagi deprivá-ció’, [Not Only Money: Subsistence Difficulties, Material Deprivation] in P. Szivós and I. Gy. Tóth (eds) Köz, teher, elosztás [Distri-Burden] (Budapest: TÁRKI Monitor Jelentések 2008), 61–75.Google Scholar
  20. Hobson, B. and L. Sz. Oláh (2006) ‘Birthstrikes? Agency and Capabilities in the Reconciliation of Employment and Family’, Marriage and Family Review, 39 (3–4), 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hobson, B., S. Fahlén and J. Takács (2009) Tensions between Rising Expectations of Parenthood and Capabilities and Agency to Achieve a Work Family Balance: Pilot Survey Capabilities Instrument Applied in Two Countries (RECWOWE Deliverable Report).Google Scholar
  22. Hobson, B., S. Fahlén and J. Takács (2011) ‘Agency and Capabilities to Achieve a Work-Life Balance: A Comparison of Sweden and Hungary’, Social Politics, 18 (2), 168–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Husz, I. (2006) ‘Iskolázottság és a gyermekvállalás idozítése’ [Educational Level and Timing of Births], Demográfia, 49(1), 46–67.Google Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  25. Kamarás, F. (2002) ‘Gyermekvállalás’ [Having Children], in Zs. Spéder (ed.) Életunk fordulópontjai [Turning Points of Our Lives] (Budapest: KSH), 51–72.Google Scholar
  26. Kapitány, B. (2002) ‘Gyermekvállalási kedv Magyarországon’ [Child-Bearing Desire in Hungary], in T. Pongrácz, Zs. Spéder (eds) Népesség — értékek — vélemények [Population — Values — Views] (Budapest: KSH NKI Kutatási jelentések 73), 23–34.Google Scholar
  27. Keyfitz, N. (1986) ‘The Family that Does Not Reproduce Itself’, Population and Development Review, 12 (Supplement: Below-Replacement Fertility in Industrial Societies: Causes, Consequences, Policies), 139–154.Google Scholar
  28. Koncz, K. (2005) ‘Noi karrierjellemzok: Esélyek és korlátok a noi életpályán’ [Female Career Features. Chances and Limitations along Women’s Career], in M. Palasik and B. Sipos (eds) Házastárs? Vetélytárs? Munkatárs? A noi szerepek változása a 20. századi Magyarországon [Wife? Competitor? Colleague? Changing of Female Roles in the 20th Century in Hungary] (Budapest: Napvilág), 57–77.Google Scholar
  29. Korintus, M. (2008) ‘Hungary: Country Notes on Leave Policies and Research’, in P. Moss and M. Korintus (eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008 (London: BERR), 225–232.Google Scholar
  30. Kovács, K. and M. Váradi (2000) ‘Women’s Life Trajectories and Class Formation in Hungary’, in S. Gal and G. Kligman (eds) Reproducing Gender. Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press), 176–199.Google Scholar
  31. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal [Hungarian Central Statistical Office] (2005) Demographic Trends in East-Central-European Capitals. International comparisons 9 http://portal.ksh.hu/pls/ksh/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/pdf/neptend.pdf (accessed 10 May 2009).Google Scholar
  32. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal [Hungarian Central Statistical Office] (2006) Visszatérés a munkaeropiacra gyermekvállalás után [Returning to the Labour Market after Having Children] http://portal.ksh.hu/pls/ksh/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/pdf/visszamunkaero05.pdf (accessed 15 December 2008).Google Scholar
  33. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal [Hungarian Central Statistical Office] (2009) Women and Men in Hungary 2008 (Budapest: Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour).Google Scholar
  34. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal [Hungarian Central Statistical Office] (2011) Labour Market Data 2000–10, http://portal.ksh.hu/pls/ksh/docs/hun/thm/2/indi2_3_1.html (accessed 2 July 2011).Google Scholar
  35. Kulcsár, L. J. (2007) ‘Something Old, Something New: Hungarian Marriage Patterns in Historical Perspective’, Journal of Family History, 32 (3), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lutz, W., V. Skirbekk and M. R. Testa (2006) ‘The Low Fertility Trap Hypothesis: Forces that May Lead to Further Postponement and Fewer Births in Europe’, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006, 4, 167–192.Google Scholar
  37. McDonald, P. (2000) ‘Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility’, Journal of Population Research, 17 (1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonald, P. (2006) ‘Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy’, Population and Development Review, 32 (3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald, P. (2008) ‘Very Low Fertility: Consequences, Causes and Policy Approaches’, The Japanese Journal of Population, 6 (1), 19–23.Google Scholar
  40. Medgyesi, M., P. Szivós and I. Gy. Tóth (2000) ‘Szegénység és egyenlotlen- ségek: generációs eltolódások’ [Poverty and Inequalities: Generational Shifts], in T. Kolosi, I. Gy. Tóth and Gy. Vukovich (eds) Társadalmi riport [Social Report] (Budapest: TÁRKI), 177–201.Google Scholar
  41. S. Molnár, E. (2001) ‘A közvélemény gyermekszám-preferenciái’ [Public Opinion Preferences of Ideal Number of Children], Demográfia, 44(3–4), 259–279.Google Scholar
  42. Nagy, B. (2001) Noi menedzserek [Female Managers] (Budapest: Aula).Google Scholar
  43. Neményi, M. and J. Takács (2006) ‘Changing Family–Changing Politics’, Review of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association, 12 (2), 37–63.Google Scholar
  44. Oláh, L. Sz. (1998) ’ “Sweden, the Middle Way”: A Feminist Approach’, The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 5 (1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plantenga, J. and C. Remery (2009) ‘Netherlands: Bridging Labour and Care’, in S. Kamerman and P. Moss (eds) The Politics of Parental Leave Policies. Children, Parenting, Gender and the Labour Market (Bristol: Policy Press).Google Scholar
  46. Pongrácz, M. (2006) ‘Opinions on Gender Roles. Findings of an International Comparative Study’, in I. Nagy, M. Pongrácz and I. Gy. Tóth (eds) Changing Roles. Report on the Situation of Women and Men in Hungary 2005 (Budapest: TÁRKI Social Research Institute), 71–84.Google Scholar
  47. Pongrácz, M. (2008) ‘Hungary: Mother’s Role–Family versus Employment’, in P. Moss and M. Korintus (eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008 (London: BERR), 22–29.Google Scholar
  48. Schneider, N. (2009) ‘Az európai családok sokfélesége’ [On the Diversity of Families in Europe], Demográfia, 52(4), 267–282.Google Scholar
  49. Sen, A. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
  50. Sen, A. (1987) The Standard of Living (The Tanner Lectures in Human Values) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  51. Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Reexamined (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Sen, A. (1993) ‘Capability and Well-Being’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  54. Sobotka, T. (2009) ‘Sub-Replacement Fertility Intentions in Austria’, European Journal of Population, 25 (4), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spéder, Zs. (2003) ‘Gyermeket vállalni–új strukturális körnlmények között. A gyermeket vállaló anyák munkapiaci státusa és iskolai végzettsége az 1990-es évek termékenységcsökkenése idején’ [Having Children under New Structural Conditions. Labour Market Status and Educational Level of Mothers during the 1990s], in Zs. Spéder (ed.) Család és népesség–itthon és Európában [Family and Population in Hungary and in Europe] (Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet–Századvég), 86–112.Google Scholar
  56. Spéder, Zs. (2006) ‘Rudiments of Recent Fertility Decline in Hungary: Postponement, Educational Differences, and Outcomes of Changing Partnership Forms’, Demographic Research, 15 (8), 253–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spéder, Zs. and B. Kapitány (2007) Gyermekek: Vágyak és tények. Dinamikus termékenységi elemzések [Children: Desires and Facts. Dynamic Fertility Analyses] (Budapest: KSH — Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet).Google Scholar
  58. Spéder, Zs. and F. Kamarás (2008) ‘Hungary: Secular Fertility Decline with Distinct Period Fluctuations’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19 (18), 599–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Takács, J. (2008) ‘Ha mosogatógép nem lenne, már elváltunk volna. Férfiak és nook otthoni munkamegosztása európai összehasonlításban’ [’If there Were No DishWasher at Home, We Would already Have Gotten a Divorce Sharing of Domestic Work between Men and Women — a European Comparison’], Esély, 19(6), 51–73.Google Scholar
  60. Testa, M. R. (2006) Childbearing Preferences and Family Issues in Europe (Brussels: European Commission).Google Scholar
  61. Tóth, O. (1995) ‘Attituodváltozások a nooi munkavállalás megítélésében’ [Attitude Changes Concerning Female Employment], Szociológiai Szemle, 5(1), 71–86.Google Scholar
  62. Utasi, Á. (2004) Feláldozott kapcsolatok. A magyar szingli [Sacrificed Relationships. The Hungarian Single] (Budapest: MTA PTI).Google Scholar
  63. Van de Kaa, D. J. and R. Lesthaeghe (1986) ‘Twee demografische transities?’ in D. J. Van de Kaa and R. Lesthaeghe (eds) Bevolking: Groei en krimp (Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus), 9–24.Google Scholar
  64. Vukovich, G. (2002) ‘Fobb népesedési folyamatok’ [Main Demographic Processes], in T. Kolosi, I. Gy. Tóth and Gy. Vukovich (eds) Társadalmi riport [Social Report] (Budapest: TÁRKI), 138–151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Judit Takács 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judit Takács

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations