Advertisement

Introduction: Aspirations and Uncertainties. Childbearing Choices and Work-Life Realities in Europe

  • Livia Sz. Oláh
  • Susanne Fahlén
Chapter
Part of the Work and Welfare in Europe book series (RECOWE)

Abstract

Europe is facing a demographic challenge based on the conjuncture of population ageing and a shrinking labour force that in the long run jeopardises economic growth and sustainable development. The current situation is the outcome of three trends: (i) long-term below-replacement level period fertility (that is less than 2.05 children per woman on average); (ii) increasing longevity; and (iii) a growing proportion of people in their late 50s and above in the labour force. While the latter two trends nearly equally apply to every society in Europe, cross-country variations in fertility levels are quite substantial, accelerating population ageing in societies where fertility rates have remained below the critical level of 1.5 children per woman for longer periods (McDonald, 2006; Myrskylä et al., 2009). In addressing country differences in fertility, the importance of the childbearing, female employment and work-life balance policy interplay has been increasingly recognised in contemporary scholarships of the welfare state, economics, gender and demography (see e.g. Castles, 2003; Gornick and Meyers, 2003; Engelhardt et al., 2004; Frejka et al., 2008a; Thévenon and Gauthier, 2011).

Keywords

Labour Force Participation Total Fertility Rate Fertility Intention Demographic Research International Social Survey Programme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aassve, A., F. C. Billari and Zs. Spéder (2006) ‘Societal Transition, Policy Changes and Family Formation: Evidences from Hungary’, European Journal of Population, 22 (2), 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn, N. and P. Mira (2002) ‘A Note on the Changing Relationship Between Fertility and Female Employment Rates in Developed Countries’, Journal of Population Economics, 5 (4), 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family, Enlarged Edition (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, E. M. (1993) ‘Fertility and Employment’, European Sociological Review, 9 (1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  6. Billari, F. C., D. Philipov and M. R. Testa (2009) ‘Attitudes, Norms and Perceived Behavioural Control: Explaining Fertility Intentions in Bulgaria’, European Journal of Population, 25 (4), 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billari, F. C., T. Frejka, J. Hobcraft, M. Macura and D. J. van de Kaa (2004) ‘Discussion of Paper “Explanations of the Fertility Crisis in Modern Societies: A Search for Commonalities”’, Population Studies, 57(3), 241–263, by John Caldwell and Thomas Schindlmayr, Population Studies, 58(1), 77–92.Google Scholar
  8. Blossfeld, H.-P., M. Mills and F. Bernardi (eds) (2006) Globalization, Uncertainty and Men’s Careers. An International Comparison (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. (2004) ‘Population Aging and the Rising Cost of Public Pensions’, Population and Development Review, 30 (1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brainerd, E. (2000) ‘Women in Transition: Changes in Gender Wage Differentials in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54 (1), 138–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewster, K. L. and R. R. Rindfuss (2000) ‘Fertility and Women’s Employment in Industrialized Nations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caldwell, J. C. and T. Schindlmayr (2003) ‘Explanations of the Fertility Crisis in Modern Societies: A Search for Commonalities’, Population Studies, 57 (3), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castles, F. G. (2003) ‘The World Turned Upside Down. Below Replacement Fertility: Changing Preferences and Family Friendly Public Policy in 21 OECD Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13 (3), 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorbritz, J. (2008) ‘Germany: Family Diversity with Low Actual and Desired Fertility’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(17), 557–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelhardt, H. (2004) ‘Fertility Intentions and Preferences: Effect of Structural and Financial Incentives and Constraints in Austria’, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers, Austrian Academy of Sciences, VID Working Paper 02/2004.Google Scholar
  16. Engelhardt, H., T. Kögel and A. Prskawetz (2004) ‘Fertility and Women’s Employment Reconsidered: A Macro-Level Time-Series Analysis for Developed Countries, 1960–2000’, Population Studies, 58 (1), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engelhardt, H. and A. Prskawetz (2004) ‘On the Changing Correlation between Fertility and Female Employment over Space and Time’, European Journal of Population, 20 (1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  19. Eurobarometer 65.1 (2006) The Future of Europe, Transborder Purchases in the European Union, and Family Planning. GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. http://www.gesis.org/eurobarometer/ (accessed 10 January 2010).Google Scholar
  20. European Commission (2005) Communication from the Commission Green Paper ‘Faced with Demographic Change, a New Solidarity between the Generations’, COM (2005) 94.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (2006) Communication. The Demographic Future of Europe-from Challenge to Opportunity, COM (2006) 571.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission (2007) 2007 European Demography Report ‘Europe’s Demographic Future: Facts and Figures’, SEC (2007) 638.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2008) Demography Report 2008: Meeting Social Needs in an Ageing Society, SEC (2008) 2911.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission (2011) Demography Report 2010: Older, More Numerous and Diverse Europeans, SEC (2011) 431.Google Scholar
  25. European Council (2002) Presidency Conclusions. Barcelona European Council, 15 and 16 March 2002, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/71025.pdf (accessed 3 December 2009).Google Scholar
  26. European Council (2006) Renewed EU Sustainable Development Strategy (Brussels: Council of the European Union).Google Scholar
  27. European Values Study (EVS) (2008) Survey Research Program on Basic Human Values, http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/ (accessed 17 December 2012).Google Scholar
  28. Eurostat (2011) Employment and Unemployment (Labour Force Survey)-Employment Rates by Sex, Age Groups and Highest Level of Education Attained, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/data/database (accessed 17 May 2011).Google Scholar
  29. Eurostat (2012a) Population-Total Fertility Rates, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/data/database (accessed 20 February 2012).Google Scholar
  30. Eurostat (2012b) Employment and Unemployment (Labour Force Survey)-Part-Time Employment as a Percentage of the Total Employment for a Given Sex and Age Group, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/data/database (accessed 20 February 2012).Google Scholar
  31. Eurostat (2012c) Employment and Unemployment (Labour Force Survey)-Total Unemployment, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/data/database (accessed 20 February 2012).Google Scholar
  32. Eurostat (2012d) Employment and Unemployment (Labour Force Survey)-Temporary Employees as Percentage of the Total Number of Employees for a Given Sex and Age Group, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/data/database (accessed 20 February 2012).Google Scholar
  33. Fahlén. S. (2012) Facets of Work-Life Balance across Europe: How the Interplay of Institutional Contexts, Work Arrangements and Individual Resources Affect Capabilities for Having a Family, and for Being Involved in Family Life (Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stockholm University).Google Scholar
  34. Frejka, T., T. Sobotka, J. M. Hoem and L. Toulemon (eds) (2008a) ‘Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe’, Demographic Research, Special Collection 7, 1–1178.Google Scholar
  35. Frejka, T., T. Sobotka, J. M. Hoem and L. Toulemon (2008b) ‘Summary and General Conclusions: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(2), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frejka, T. and J.-P. Sardon (2004) Childbearing Trends and Prospects in Low-Fertility Countries: A Cohort Analysis (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).Google Scholar
  37. Goldstein, J., W. Lutz and M. R. Testa (2003) ‘The Emergence of Sub-Replacement Family Size Ideals in Europe’, Population Research and Policy Review, 22 (5–6), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goldstein, J. R., T. Sobotka and A. Jasilioniene (2009) ‘The End of “Lowest-Low” Fertility?’ Population and Development Review, 35 (4), 663–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gornick, J. C. and M. K. Meyers (2003) Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
  40. Hagewen, K. J. and S. P. Morgan (2005) ‘Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970–2002’, Population and Development Review, 31 (3), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heiland, F., A. Prskawetz and W. C. Sanderson (2005) ‘Do the More-Educated Prefer Smaller Families?’ Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers, Austrian Academy of Sciences, VID Working Paper 03/2005.Google Scholar
  42. Hobson, B. and S. Fahlén (2009) ‘Competing Scenarios for European Fathers: Applying Sen’s Capabilities and Agency Framework to Work-Family Balance’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624 (1), 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hobson, B. and L. Sz. Oláh (2006a) ‘Tournant positif ou “grève des ventres”? Formes de résistance au modèle de l’homme gagne-pain et à la restructuration de l’État- providence’ (‘The Positive Turn or Birthstrikes? Sites of Resistance to Residual Male Breadwinner Societies and to Welfare State Restructuring’), Recherches et Prévisions, 83, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hobson, B. and L. Sz. Oláh (2006b) ‘Birthstrikes? Agency and Capabilities in the Reconciliation of Employment and Family’, Marriage and Family Review, 39 (3–4), 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoem, J. M. (2008) ‘Overview Chapter 8: The Impact of Public Policies on European Fertility’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(10), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Institut National D’études Démographiques (INED) [The French National Institute for Demographic Studies] (2012) Population in Figures, http://www.ined.fr/en/pop_figures/developed_countries/situation/one_indicator/ (accessed 20 February 2012).Google Scholar
  47. International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) (1994) Family and Changing Gender Roles II, http://www.issp.org/ (accessed 18 December 2012).Google Scholar
  48. International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) (2002) Family and Changing Gender Roles III, http://www.issp.org/ (accessed 18 December 2012).Google Scholar
  49. Joshi, H. (1998) ‘The Opportunity Costs of Childbearing: More than Mothers’ Business’, Journal of Population Economics, 11 (2), 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kögel, T. (2004) ‘Did the Association Between Fertility and Female Employment within OECD Countries Really Change its Sign?’ Journal of Population Economics, 17 (1), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Köppen, K. (2006) ‘Second Births in Western Germany and France’, Demographic Research, 14 (14), 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Korpi, W. (2000) ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States’, Social Politics, 7 (2), 127–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kotowska, I., J. Jôzwiak, A. Matysiak and A. Baranowska (2008) ‘Poland: Fertility Decline as a Response to Profound Societal and Labour Market Changes?’ Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(22), 795–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kreyenfeld, M. (2004) ‘Fertility Decisions in the FRG and GDR: An Analysis with Data from the German Fertility and Family Survey’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 3), S3(11), 275–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Livi-Bacci, M. (2001) ‘Comment: Desired Family Size and the Future Course of Fertility’, Population and Development Review, 27 (Supplement: Global Fertility Transition), 282–289.Google Scholar
  56. Lutz, W., B. C. O’Neill and S. Scherbov (2003) ‘Europe’s Population at a Turning Point’, Science, 299 (28 March 2003), 1991–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lutz, W. and V. Skirbekk (2005) ‘Policies Addressing the Tempo Effect in Low-Fertility Countries’, Population and Development Review, 31 (4), 699–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lutz, W., V. Skirbekk and M. R. Testa (2006) ‘The Low Fertility Trap Hypothesis. Forces that May Lead to Further Postponement and Fewer Births in Europe’, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006, 4, 167–192.Google Scholar
  59. Machin, S. (2008) ‘An Appraisal of Economic Research on Changes in Wage Inequality’, Labour, 22 (SUPPL.1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McDonald, P. (2000) ‘Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility’, Journal of Population Research, 17 (1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McDonald, P. (2002) ‘Sustaining Fertility through Public Policy: The Range of Options’, Population (English Edition), 57 (3), 417–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McDonald, P. (2006) ‘Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy’, Population and Development Review, 32 (3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McDonald, P. (2007) ‘Low Fertility and Policy’, Ageing Horizons, 7, 22–27.Google Scholar
  64. McDonald, P. and R. Kippen (2001) ‘Labor Supply Prospects in 16 Developed Countries, 2000–2050’, Population and Development Review, 27 (1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Morgan, S. P. and R. Berkowitz King (2001) ‘Why Have Children in the 21st Century? Biological Predispositions, Social Coercion, Rational Choice’, European Journal of Population, 17 (1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moss, P. and M. Korintus (eds) (2008) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008. Employment Relation Research Series No. 100 (London: Department for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform).Google Scholar
  67. Myrskylä, M., J. R. Goldstein and Y.-H. A. Cheng (2012) ‘New Cohort Fertility Forecasts for the Developed World’, MPIDR Working Paper WP-2012–014.Google Scholar
  68. Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler and F. C. Billari (2009) ‘Advances in Development Reverse Fertility Decline’, Nature, 460 (6 August 2009), 741–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neyer, G. (2006) ‘Family Policies and Fertility in Europe: Fertility Policies at the Intersection of Gender Policies, Employment Policies and Care Policies’, MPIDR Working Papers WP-2006–010.Google Scholar
  70. OECD (2006) OECD Family Database-Total Fertility Rates, http://www.oecd.org/social/socialpoliciesanddata/oecdfamilydatabase.htm (accessed 18 December 2012).Google Scholar
  71. OECD (2009) OECD Family Database-Usual Working Hours Per Week by Gender, http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database (accessed 21 October 2009).Google Scholar
  72. OECD (2010a) OECD Family Database-Maternal Employment Rates by Age of Youngest Child, http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database (accessed 14 December 2010).Google Scholar
  73. OECD (2010b) OECD Family Database-Key Characteristics of Parental Leave Systems, http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database (accessed 29 June 2010).Google Scholar
  74. OECD (2011a) Doing Better for Families (Paris: OECD Publishing).Google Scholar
  75. OECD (2011b) OECD Stat Extracts-Labour Force Participation Rate, http://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed 13 May 2011).Google Scholar
  76. OECD (2011c) OECD Family database-Enrolment in Childcare and Pre-Schools, http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database (accessed 18 March 2011).Google Scholar
  77. OECD (2012) OECD Stat Extracts-Labour Force Participation Rate, http://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed 20 February 2012).Google Scholar
  78. Oláh, L. Sz. (2011) ‘Family Policies and Birth Rates: Childbearing, Female Work, and the Time Policy of Early Childhood Education in Postwar Europe’ in K. Hagemann, K. Jarausch and C. Allemann-Ghionda (eds) Children, Families, and States: Time Policies of Childcare, Preschool, and Primary Education in Europe (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books), 113–131.Google Scholar
  79. Oláh, L. Sz. and E. M. Bernhardt (2008) ‘Sweden: Combining Childbearing and Gender Equality’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(28), 1105–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Philipov, D., Zs. Spéder and F. C. Billari (2006) ‘Soon, Later, or Ever? The Impact of Anomie and Social Capital on Fertility Intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001)’, Population Studies, 60 (3), 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rindfuss, R. R., K. B. Guzzo and S. P. Morgan (2003) ‘The Changing Institutional Context of Low Fertility’, Population Research and Policy Review, 22 (5–6), 411–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sardon, J.-P. and G. D. Robertson (2004) ‘Recent Demographic Trends in the Developed Countries’, Population (English Edition), 59 (2), 263–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Salles, A. (2012) ‘Are Women More Economically Active in Germany than France?’ Population & Societies, 493.Google Scholar
  84. Schoen, R., N. M. Astone, Y. J. Kim, C. A. Nathanson and J. M. Fields (1999) ‘Do Fertility Intentions Affect Fertility Behavior?’ Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61 (3), 790–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Reexamined (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  86. Sen, A. (1993) ‘Capability and Well-Being’ in Martha C. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sobotka, T. (2009) ‘Sub-Replacement Fertility Intentions in Austria’, European Journal of Population, 25 (4), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sobotka, T. and W. Lutz (2010) ‘Misleading Policy Messages Derived from the Period TFR: Should We Stop Using it?’ Comparative Population Studies, 35 (3), 637–664.Google Scholar
  89. Spéder, Zs. and F. Kamarás (2008) ‘Hungary: Secular Fertility Decline with Distinct Period Fluctuations’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(18), 599–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tazi-Preve, I. M., D. Bichlbauer and A. Goujon (2004) ‘Gender Trouble and Its Impact on Fertility Intentions’, Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, 40, 5–24.Google Scholar
  91. Thévenon, O. and A. Gauthier (2011) ‘Family Policies in Developed Countries: A “Fertility-Booster” with Side-Effects’, Community, Work and Family, 14 (2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Toulemon, L., A. Pailhé and C. Rossier (2008) ‘France: High and Stable Fertility’, Demographic Research (Special Collection 7), 19(16), 503–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vienna Institute of Demography (2008) European Demographic Data Sheet 2008, http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/datasheet/download_2008.shtml (accessed 29 November 2012).Google Scholar
  94. Vienna Institute of Demography (2010) European Demographic Data Sheet 2010, http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/datasheet/download_2010.shtml (accessed 29 November 2012).Google Scholar
  95. Vienna Institute of Demography (2012) European Demographic Data Sheet 2012, http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/datasheet/download_2012.shtml (accessed 29 November 2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Livia Sz. Oláh and Susanne Fahlén 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Livia Sz. Oláh
  • Susanne Fahlén

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations