Skip to main content

Facing the Image: Towards an Ethics of Seeing

  • Chapter
Ethics of Media

Abstract

In a dialogue that concerns moderation and self-knowledge, Plato suggests that there could be a way of seeing that does not observe the object but focuses on our ways of seeing it. More accurately, Plato seems to suggest a vision of vision itself, a way of facing that makes what is seen into a mirror that returns the vision to itself. At the centre of the following discussion is the duality of facing the image: an image that we face and an image that faces back at us. We usually look at images for what they are, and examine what they represent or how they affect us. But we can also make the image look back by describing its capacity to awaken in us a way of seeing that is more reflexive, that places us as the agents of sight and hence as implicated by what we see.

Amit Pinchevski

- Suppose that there is a kind of vision which is not like ordinary vision, but a vision of itself and of other sorts of vision, and of the defect of them, which in seeing sees no colour, but only itself and other sorts of vision: Do you think that there is such a kind of vision?

- Certainly not.

Plato, Charmides

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. M. (2004) ‘Bare Life, Bearing Witness: Auschwitz and the Pornography of Horror’, Parallax 10(1): 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (1999) Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2006) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. (1993) ‘The Face and the Caress: Levinas’s Ethical Alterations of Sensibility’, in David Michael Levin (ed.) Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, 252–272. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1998) ‘The Deaths of Roland Barthes’, in Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) Philosophy and Non-Philosophy Since Merleau-Ponty, 259–297. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1994) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, H. (2011) ‘Facing Images After Lévinas’, Angelaki, 16(1): 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1961/1988) Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1974/1998) Otherwise than Being, Or Beyond Essence. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1985) Ethics and Infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1989) ‘On Obliteration’, Art & Text, 33 (Winter): 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1998) Of God Who Come to Mind. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2003) Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2006) ‘Hard, Dry Eyes and Eyes that Weep: Vision and Ethics in Levinas and Derrida’, Postmodern Culture, 16(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/pmc/v016/16.2taylor.html.

  • Van de Vall, R. (2003) ‘Touching the Face: The Ethics of Visuality between Levinas and Rembrandt Self-Portrait’, in Claire Farago and Robert Zwijnenberg (eds.) Compelling Visuality: The Works of Art in and out of History, 93–111. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasseleu, C. (1998) Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigary, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Roy Brand and Amit Pinchevski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brand, R. (2013). Facing the Image: Towards an Ethics of Seeing. In: Couldry, N., Madianou, M., Pinchevski, A. (eds) Ethics of Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317513_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics