Advertisement

Introduction

  • Matt Cook
Chapter
Part of the Genders and Sexualities in History book series (GSX)

Abstract

In June 2012 a geodesic dome tent was pitched on the rooftop terrace of the Hayward Gallery on London’s South Bank. This was the ‘Sundown Schoolhouse of Queer Home Economics’ where, for a month, you could learn and hone domestic skills — from cleaning and cooking to flower arranging and knitting. There were workshops on rug making, on ‘avant-gardening’, and on queer family trees, as well as discussions, performances and talks. It was, said school founder and Californian architect Fritz Haeg, a ‘rogue’ component of the Hayward’s ‘Wide Open School’ programme which took place inside the gallery itself.1 Just next door a few months later, the Royal Festival Hall hosted ‘Alternative Fairytales, Alternative Families’ — a day of performance and events celebrating ‘the rise of the alternative family’ and the estimated ‘10,000 same-sex parent families’ nationwide.2

Keywords

Home Life Domestic Life Civil Partnership Alternative Family Oral Testimony 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    For a flavour see: Amy Brandzel, ‘Queering Citizenship? Same-sex Marriage and the State’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 11, no. 2 (2005): 171–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeffrey Weeks, Brian Heaphy, and Catherine Donovan, Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments (London: Routledge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Warner, The Trouble With Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life (New York: Free Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  4. Lisa Duggan, ‘The New Heteronormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neo-Liberalism’, in Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, ed. Russ Castronovo and Dana D. Nelson (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
  5. S. Roseneil and S. Budgeon, ‘Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond “the Family”: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early 21st Century’, Current Sociology 52, no. 2 (2004): 135–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Gorman-Murray, ‘Contesting Domestic Ideals: Queering the Australian Home’, Australian Geographer 38, no. 2 (2007): 195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stephen Hicks, Lesbian, Gay and Queer Parenting: Families, Intimacies, Genealogies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5.
    On this point see: Carol Smart, Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), 21.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Hilde Heynen and Gulsum Baydar, eds., Negotiating Domesticity: Spatial Productions of Gender in Modern Architecture (London: Routledge, 2005), intro, 2.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Cited in: Matt Houlbrook, Queer London: Perils and Pleasures in the Sexual Metropolis, 1918–1957 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), 110.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    On home in relation to Englishness see especially: Deborah Cohen, Household Gods: The British and Their Possessions (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), xiiGoogle Scholar
  12. Alison Ravetz, The Place of Home: English Domestic Environments, 1914–2000 (London: Spon, 1995).Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Deborah Cohen and Sharon Marcus are notable exceptions in this regard. Cohen, Household Gods; Deborah Cohen, Family Secrets: Living with Shame from the Victorians to the Present Day (London: Viking, 2013)Google Scholar
  14. Sharon Marcus, Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007); Marcus, ‘At Home’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    As Kath Weston has it. Kath Weston, Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), 22.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    For foundational arguments on the power of these discourses see especially: Jeffrey Weeks, Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain from the Nineteenth Century to the Present (London: Quartet Books, 1977)Google Scholar
  17. Michel Foucault, History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley (London: Allen Lane, 1979).Google Scholar
  18. Mary McIntosh, ‘The Homosexual Role’, Social Problems 16, no. 2 (1968): 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 14.
    Jordon Goodman, ‘History and Anthropology’, in Companion to Historiography, ed. Michael Bently (London: Routledge, 1997), 794; on this approach see also: Judy Giles, The Parlour and the Suburb: Domestic Identities, Class, Femininity and Modernity (Oxford: Berg, 2004), 24.Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    On this point see: Scott Bravmann, Queer Fictions of the Past: History, Culture, and Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 127.Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    On the usefulness of stereotype in analysis see: David M. Halperin, How to be Gay (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 17.
    I borrow this idea of ‘composure’ from Graham Dawson who uses it to describe the effect of giving a testimony and creating a narrative of the self. See: Graham Dawson, Soldier Heroes: British Adventure, Empire, and the Imagining of Masculinities (London: Routledge, 1994), intro.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    As Joe Ackerley has it in: J.R. Ackerley, My Father and Myself (New York: NYRB Classics, 2006), 239.Google Scholar
  24. 19.
    See: Sally Ledger, The New Woman: Fiction and Feminism at the Fin de Siècle (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997), chap. 4Google Scholar
  25. On this see espedaily: Laura Doan, ‘Woman’s Place in the Home’, in Sapphic Modernities: Sexuality, Women and National Culture, ed. J. Garrity and L. Doan (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martha Vicinus, Intimate Friends: Women Who Loved Women, 1778–1928 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004); for a flavour in sexology, see: Havelock Ellis and John Addington Symonds, Sexual Inversion, ed. Ivan Crozier (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), chap. 4.Google Scholar
  27. 20.
    George Cruikshank, Sinks of London Laid Open (London: J. Duncombe, 1848).Google Scholar
  28. 21.
    Charles Ricketts, Self-Portrait: Taken from the Letters and Journals, ed. T. Sturge Moore and C. Lewis (London: Peter Davies, 1939), 341.Google Scholar
  29. 22.
    George Orwell, Down and Out in Paris and London (London: Penguin Books, 2003), 203.Google Scholar
  30. 23.
    Paul Sieveking, Man Bites Dog: The Scrapbooks of and Edwardian Eccentric (London: Jay Landesman, 1980), preface, 5.Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    Cited in: Simon Shepherd, Because We’re Queers: The Life and Crimes of Kenneth Halliwell and Joe Orton (London: Gay Mens Press, 1989), title page.Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    Derek Jarman, Smiling in Slow Motion (London: Century, 2000), 10.Google Scholar
  33. 28.
    Mary Douglas, ‘The Idea of a Home: a Kind of Space’, Social Research 58, no. 1 (1991): 287–307.Google Scholar
  34. 29.
    For a vivid sense of the difference class can make see: Joanna Bourke, Working Class Cultures in Britain 1890–1960: Gender, Class, and Ethnicity (London: Routledge, 1994), chap. 2 & 3Google Scholar
  35. Ross McKibbin, Classes and Cultures: England, 1918–1951 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), chap. 5 & 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 30.
    Zvi Razi, ‘The Myth of the Immutable English Family’, Past and Present 140, no. 1 (1993): 3–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. L. Davidoff, ‘The Family in Britain’, The Cambridge Social Histoty of Britain, 1750–1950 2 (1993): 71–129Google Scholar
  38. Tamara K. Hareven, ‘The Home and the Family in Historical Perspective’, Social Research 58, no. 1 (1991): 253–285.Google Scholar
  39. 31.
    Cohen, A Family Secrets; Laura Doan, Disturbing Practices: History, Sexuality, and Women’s Experience of Modern War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 32.
    John Tosh, A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 4.Google Scholar
  41. There is now a large literature on the gender and sexual dynamics of domestic life. Aside from works cited elsewhere in this introduction I have found the following especially suggestive: Calvin Smith, ‘Men Don’t Do That Sort of Thing’, Men and Masculinities 12 (October 1998): 138–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peter Williams, ‘Constituting Class and Gender: A Social History of the Home, 1700–1901’, in Class and Space: The Making of Urban Society, ed. NJ Thrift and Peter Williams (London: Routledge, 1987)Google Scholar
  43. Tony Chapman, Gender and Domestic Life (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002)Google Scholar
  44. Juliet Kinchin, ‘Interiors: Nineteenth Century Essays on the “Masculine” and “Feminine” Room’, in The Gendered Object, ed. Pat Kirkham (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  45. Heynen and Baydar, Negotiating Domesticity; Clare Cooper Marcus, House as a Mirror of Self: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home (Berkeley: Conari Press, 1995)Google Scholar
  46. Nikolas Rose, Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
  47. 33.
    Giles, The Parlour and the Suburb, 4; see also Cohen, Household Gods, 138; S.I. Benn and G.F. Gaus, eds., ‘The Liberal Conception of the Public and the Private’, in Public and Private in Social Life (London: Croom Helm, 1983), 31–65Google Scholar
  48. Linda McDowell, Gender Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999); Marcus, House as a Mirror Google Scholar
  49. Kenneth Plummer, Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003); Rose, Governing the Soul Google Scholar
  50. J.A. Holstein and J.F. Gubrium, ‘Deprivatization and the Construction of Domestic Life’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 57, no. 4 (1995): 894–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 34.
    Freud’s understanding of the uncanny (or ‘unheimlich’/unhomely) has been helpful to my thinking here. Sigmund Freud, The Uncanny, trans. David McLintock (London: Penguin, 2003).Google Scholar
  52. 35.
    Morag Shiach, ‘Modernism, the City and the “Domestic Interior”’, Home Cultures 2, no. 3 (2005): 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 36.
    On the potency of desire in this respect see, for example: A. Blunt, ‘Home and Identity: Life Stories in Text and Person’, in Cultural Geography in Practice, ed. Alison Blunt, P. Gruffudd, J. May, Miles Ogborn, and D. Pinder (London: Arnold, 2003)Google Scholar
  54. Adrian Forty, Objects of Desire: Design and Society, 1750–1980 (London: Thames and Hudson, 1986).Google Scholar
  55. 37.
    See: Aaron Betsky, Building Sex: Men, Women, and the Construction of Sexuality (New York: William Morrow, 1995)Google Scholar
  56. Aaron Betsky, Queer Space: Architecture and Same-Sex Desire (New York: William Morrow, 1997)Google Scholar
  57. Beatriz Colomina, ed., Sexuality amp; Space (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  58. 38.
    There is a large literature describing this process; see, for example: Charles Rice, The Emergence of the Interior: Architecture, Modernity, Domesticity (London: Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar
  59. Mary Poovey, Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988); Tosh, A Man’s Place CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Erika Diane Rappaport, Shopping for Pleasure: Women in the Making of London’s West End (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000); Cohen, Household Gods; Marcus, Between Women.Google Scholar
  61. 39.
    Cohen, Household Gods, chap. 4; J. Tosh, ‘Imperial Masculinity and the Flight from Domesticity in Britain 1880–1914’, in Gender and Colonialism, ed. Timothy P. Foley (Galway: Galway University Press, 1995), 72–85.Google Scholar
  62. 40.
    Amanda Vickery, for example, suggests the importance of the eighteenth century in this division. Amanda Vickery, Behind Closed Doors: At Home in Georgian England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  63. 41.
    On this point see: John D’ Emilio, ‘Capitalism and Gay Identity’, in Families in the US: Kinship and Domestic Politics, ed. Karen Hansen and Anita Garey (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  64. 42.
    Matt Cook, London and the Culture of Homosexuality, 1885–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), chap. 1 & 2Google Scholar
  65. see also: Sean Brady, Masculinity and Male Homosexuality in Britain, 1861–1913 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. H.G. Cocks, Nameless Offences: Homosexual Desire in the Nineteenth Century (London: I.B. Tauris, 2003).Google Scholar
  67. 43.
    Ed Cohen, Talk on the Wilde Side: Towards a Genealogy of a Discourse on Male Sexualities (London: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar
  68. Neil Bartlett, Who Was That Man: A Present for Mr Oscar Wilde (London: Serpent’s Tail, 1988).Google Scholar
  69. 44.
    Ravetz, The Place of Home, 41, 61–63; chap. 2 & 3; Sharon Marcus, Apartment Stories: City and Home in Nineteenth-Century Paris and London (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), 84.Google Scholar
  70. 45.
    Sara Ahmed, The Cultural Politics of Emotion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004), 154; Marcus, Apartment Stories, 4.Google Scholar
  71. 48.
    See also: Cocks, Nameless Offences; Morris B. Kaplan, Sodom on the Thames: Sex, Love, and Scandal in Wilde Times (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005); Houlbrook, Queer London.Google Scholar
  72. 49.
    On this point see: Catherine Robinson, ‘I Think Home is More Than a Building: Young Home(Less) People on the Cusp of Home, Self and Something Else’, Urban Policy and Research 20, no. 1 (2002): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 50.
    Carlo Ginzberg, ‘Microhistory: Two or Three Things That I Know About It’, Critical Inquiry 20, no. 1 (1993): 10–35, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. for more on the use of case studies as indicative rather than representative see: Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Epistemology of the Closet (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 29Google Scholar
  75. Michael Quinn Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. (London: Sage, 2002).Google Scholar
  76. 51.
    Mary Chamberlain and Paul Thompson, Narrative and Genre (London: Routledge, 1998), 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. see also and especially: Jean Baudrillard, The System of Objects (London: Verso, 1996), 8Google Scholar
  78. Judy Attfield, Wild Things: The Material Culture of Everyday Life (Oxford: Berg, 2000), chap. 2 & 5Google Scholar
  79. Smart, Personal Life, chap. 7; Daniel Miller, ed., ‘Possessions’, in Home Possessions: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors (Oxford: Berg, 2001)Google Scholar
  80. Daniel Miller, Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter (London: UCL Press, 1997), intro; Forty, Objects of Desire.Google Scholar
  81. 53.
    Richard Dyer and David Halperin both pursue this argument in relation to a queer appreciation of the arts. See: Richard Dyer, Culture of Queers (London: Routledge, 2001); Halperin, How to be Gay.Google Scholar
  82. 55.
    Raphael Samuel and Paul Thompson, The Myths We Live By (London: Routledge, 1990), 8.Google Scholar
  83. 56.
    Kenneth Plummer, Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social Worlds (London: Routledge, 1994), 203;Google Scholar
  84. see also: Lynn Jamieson, Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), 10–13.Google Scholar
  85. 58.
    For a survey of some of those myths and fantasies (and the way they relate to everyday lives) see especially: John R. Gillis, A World of Their Own Making: Myth, Ritual, and the Quest for Family Values (New York: Basic Books, 1996).Google Scholar
  86. 60.
    Peter Parker, Ackerley: A Life of J.R. Ackerley (London: Constable, 1989), 261.Google Scholar
  87. 61.
    Derek Jarman, Modern Nature: The Journals of Derek Jarman (London: Century, 1991), 18.Google Scholar
  88. 66.
    James W. Cook, Lawrence B. Glickman, and Michael O’Malley, eds., The Cultural Turn in U.S. History: Past, Present, and Future (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008), 25Google Scholar
  89. see also: Matt Cook, ‘Squatting in History: Queer Pasts and the Cultural Turn’, in Social Research After the Cultural Turn, ed. Sasha Roseneil and Stephen Frosh (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012).Google Scholar
  90. 67.
    Bryant Keith Alexander, Performing Black Masculinity: Race, Culture, and Queer Identity (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006), xxGoogle Scholar
  91. see also: Kath Weston, Render Me, Gender Me: Lesbians Talk Sex, Class, Color, Nation, Studmuffins (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 5.Google Scholar
  92. 68.
    Seth Koven makes this point beautifully in: Seth Koven, Slumming: Sexual and Social Politics in Victorian London (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), intro.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Matt Cook 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonUK

Personalised recommendations