Abstract
It is perhaps inevitable that proponents of each of the various views on the causes and nature of the alleged transatlantic divide will look for — and sometimes find — arguments and data from public opinion research results that tend to confirm their own differing hypotheses. At the same time, the core issue of where and why American and European publics differ on questions of war and peace and the use of military force in particular — as has been shown in Chapter Three — has not yet been adequately addressed. Continuing the analysis, we now want to supplement more conventional presentations of results of surveys on this issue by digging a bit deeper into the nature and structure of the transatlantic divide by looking primarily at general attitudes, or the level of political ideology, and then systematically comparing the relative explanatory power of these different dimensions of the Atlantic community in accounting for support for the use of force in hypothetical and real situations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Philip Everts and Pierangelo Isernia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Everts, P., Isernia, P. (2015). The Nature and Structure of the Transatlantic Divide. In: Public Opinion, Transatlantic Relations and the Use of Force. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315755_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315755_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30896-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31575-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)