Skip to main content

Referendums in Western Europe

  • Chapter
Referendums Around the World

Abstract

In present-day Europe, referendums are seen almost as synonymous with democracy. In the words of a thoughtful observer, ‘in the last resort, the arguments against the referendum are … arguments against democracy’ (Bogdanor 1981: 93). But it was not always like that. As in other parts of the world, referendums in Western Europe have previously been held during times of authoritarian regimes in countries. Indeed, in earlier times, criticizing the referendum was almost de rigueur. Robert Michels, in his critique of the oligarchic tendencies of the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD) in Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens, warned that ‘a Führer [sic!] would lead the people astray through unclear questions, and would himself be solely entitled to interpret the result afterwards’ (Michels 1925: 431). Michel’s prescience proved accurate; there were authoritarian plebiscites in Austria, Germany and Spain while these countries were under authoritarian and totalitarian rule. Hitler held referendums in 1933, 1994, 1936 and 1938. In Spain, the Ley de sucesión en Jefatura del Estado 1947, which stipulated that Spain should become a monarchy upon the death of Franco, was approved in a plebiscite in 1946, and a further referendum was held on a new constitution in 1966. Similarly, there were plebiscites in Greece in the 1960s, when this country was ruled by a military Junta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlfeldt, G. and Maennig, W. (2012) ‘Voting on a NIMBY Facility Proximity Cost of an “Iconic” Stadium’, Urban Affairs Review, 48(2), 205–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G.A., and Powell, G.B. (1966) Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach, Boston: Little Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D. (2011) Direct DemocracyWorldwide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1977) Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, L. (2012) Campaign Strategy in a Direct Democracy, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørklund, T. (1982) ‘The Demand for Referendum: When Does It Arise and When Does It Succeed?’ Scandinavian Political Studies, 5(3), 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørklund, T. (1997) Om Folkeavstemninger. Norge og Norden 1905–1994, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V.B. (1981) The People and the Party System: The Referendum and Electoral Reform in British Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. and Kitzinger, U.W. (1976) The 1975 Referendum, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. and A. Ranney (1994) ‘Conclusion’ in David Butler and Austin Ranney (Eds) Referendums Around the World, American Enterprise Institute, Washington DC, 258–265.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, R.A. (1981) The Rule of Law: Albert Venn Dicey: Victorian Jurist, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicey, A.V. (1890) ‘Ought the Referendum to be Introduced into England?’ Contemporary Review, 57, 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Maurice (1981) [1951] Les Partis Politique, Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigaard, Søren (1993) Idealer og Politik: Historien om Grundloven af 1953, Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S.E. (1980) The Changing British Party System 1945–1979, Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestiere, C. (2009) ‘Kirchheimer Italian Style: Catch-All Parties or Catch-All Blocs’, Party Politics, 15, 573–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark, Marsh, Michael, and McLaren, Lauren (1994) ‘Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, André and Baum, Michael A. (2003) ‘Referenda Voting in Portugal, 1998: The Effects of Party Sympathies, Social Structure and Pressure Groups, European Journal of Political Research, 42(1), 135–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.H. (1999) The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, Sara B. (2006 ‘Direct Democracy and European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), January 2006, 153, 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houska, J.J. (1985) Influencing Mass Political Behaviour: Elites and Political Substructures in the Netherlands and Austria, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, Jr. V.O. (1968) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kommers, D.P. (1994) ‘The Federal Constitutional Court in the German Political System’, Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 470–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, L. (2002) ‘Referendums and Elections: How Do Campaigns Differ?’ in David Farrell and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck (Eds) Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, London: Routledge, pp. 152–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, L. (2005) The European Constitution Referendums: What We Already Know, Stockholm: IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodici, C. (1999) ‘The Italian Senato’ in S.C. Patterson and A. Mughan (Eds) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthardt, W. (1994) Direkte Demokratie: Ein Vergleich in Westeuropa, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, G. (2012) ‘Switzerland: Initiatives as a Measure to Control the Political Agenda’ in T. Schiller and M. Setälä (Eds) Citizen’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marxer, W. (2012) ‘Initiatives in Liechtenstein: Safety Valve in a Complex System of Government’ in T. Schiller and M. Setälä (Eds) Citizen’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J. (1992) ‘The Economics of Direct Legislation’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 541–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J.G. (2008) For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1925) Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens, Leipzig: Alfred Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, T. (2003) ‘Folkeomröstningar’ in Ingvar Matson and Olaf Petersson (Eds) Svensk Författningspolitik, Stockholm: SNS Förlag, pp. 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, L. (1996) ‘France: Towards a Less Controversial Use of the Referendum’ in M. Gallagher and P.V. Uleri (Eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe, London: Macmillan, pp. 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ørebech, P. (2010) ‘The Icesave Bank of Iceland; from Rock-solid to Volcano Hot: Is the EU Deposit Guarantee Scheme Resisting Financial Meltdown?’ Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 6(6), 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2000) ‘Checks and Balances in a Unicameral Parliament: The Case of the Danish Minority Referendum’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 6(3), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2007) Supply Side Politics, London: CPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2012a) ‘Voting on Electoral Reform: A Comparative Perspective on the Alternative Vote Referendum’, The Political Quarterly, 83(1), 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2013) Direct Democracy: A Comparative Study of the Theory and Practice of Government by the People, Manchester, Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2014) Referendums and Ethnic Conflicts, Pittsburgh PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. and Lipset, S.M. (1967) Party-Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, U. (2011) ‘Il Quirinale Soddisfatto una prova di democrazia’, La Repubblica, 14 June, A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruin, O. (1996) ‘Sweden: The Referendum as an Instrument for Defusing Political Issues’ in M. Gallagher and P.V. Uleri (Eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe, London: Macmillan, pp. 171–184.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.A. and Tolbert, C. (2004) Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spierman, O. (1998) ‘Hvad kommer efter tyve? — En analyse af Højesterets dom i Grundlovssagen’, in Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen, Vol. 131, pp. 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, T. (2010) ‘Campaign Spending and Ballot Measures’ in Karin Gilland Lutz and Simon Hug (Eds) Financing Referendum Campaigns, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, P. (1996) ‘Denmark: The Referendum as Minority Protection’ in M. Gallagher and P.V. Uleri (Eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe, London: Macmillan, pp. 33–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (2006) De la démocratie en Amérique I, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uleri, P.V. (1996) Italy: Referendums and Initiatives from the Origins to the Crisis of a Democratic Regime. M. Gallagher and P.V. Uleri (Eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 106–126.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uleri, P.V. (2002) ‘On Referendum Voting in Italy: YES, NO or Non–Vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums’, European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 863–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Matt Qvortrup

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qvortrup, M. (2014). Referendums in Western Europe. In: Qvortrup, M. (eds) Referendums Around the World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314703_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics