Abstract
In an earlier chapter on long-lasting relationships, I referred to evidence showing how in the West, as well as in cities like Mumbai and Hong Kong, gay men were capable of conducting stable, long-term relationships resembling the companionate marriage in all but name, and had a history of doing so. This chapter and the next are paired because they both consider the views of the men from the international sample regarding the push for marriage equality or formal recognition of same-sex relationships. In this chapter, I examine the arguments of those men who favoured marriage equality, and in the chapter that follows will examine the arguments of the men who opposed it. These two chapters most clearly reflect aged-based differences of opinion among gay men. As the discussion in this chapter shows, it is men aged 31 and younger who most uniformly support marriage equality; while, by contrast, in the next chapter, the strongest arguments against gay marriage are to be found in the views of men aged 51 and older.
As friends my own age who are heterosexual get less and less into the idea of traditional marriage … the gays have really embraced … [the] bluestone church and black and white tuxedo. … Gays are pretty much the only ones who really care about marriage these days. If you took away the right of marriage from heterosexual twenty-somethings, they would not care.
(Denis, aged 27, Melbourne)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Boswell (1995) The Marriage of Likeness: Same Sex Unions in Pre-modern Europe (London: Harper Collins).
K. Plummer (1981) ‘Going Gay: Identities, Lifecycles and Lifestyles in the Male Gay World’ in J. Hart and D. Richardson (eds) The Theory and Practice of Homosexuality (London: Routledge&Kegan Paul), pp. 93–110;
A. Rolfe and E. Peel (2011) ‘“It’s a Double-Edged Thing”: The Paradox of Civil Partnership and Why Some Couples are Choosing Not to Have One’, Feminism and Psychology 21(3) 317–35;
B. Shipman and C. Smart (2007) ‘“It’s Made a Huge Difference”: Recognition, Rights and the Personal Significance of Civil Partnerships’, Sociological Research Online (1). Some scholars have focused on the experiences of lesbians and gay men. While questions of sexual identity and relational equality have seen coalitions form between gay men and lesbians, each has a unique, gendered view on marriage. My perspective in this chapter and more broadly in this book is on the experience of non-representative samples of gay men and gay men only.
A. McLaren (1999) Twentieth Century Sexuality: A History (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 199.
G. Chauncey (2004) Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today’s Debate over Gay Equality (Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books), p. 3.
G. Hekma (1999) ‘Same-Sex Relations among Men in Europe, 1700–1990’ in F.X Elder, L.A. Hall, and G. Hekma (eds) Sexual Cultures in Europe: Themes in Sexuality (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 99–100.
Information on state-by-state legislation in favour same-sex marriage is drawn from N.D. Polikoff (2008) Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage: Valuing All Families under the Law (Boston, MA: Beacon Press), pp. 110–20.
As reported in The Age, 5 July 2012; see also J.P. McCormick (2012) ‘Same- Sex Marriage Bill to be introduced in France this October’, Pink News 26 August: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/08/26/same-sex-marriage-bill-to-be-introduced-in-france-this-october, accessed 29 August 2012.
G. Herdt (2009) Moral Panics, Sex Panics: Fear and Fight over Sexual Rights (New York: New York University Press), pp. 157, 182.
C. Frew (2010) ‘The Social Construction of Same-Sex Marriage in Australia: Implications for Same-Sex Unions’, Law in Context, 28(1), 86.
M. Kirby (2011) A Private Life: Fragments, Memories, Friends (Sydney: Allen&Unwin), p. 91.
S. Roberts (2012) ‘Australia votes against legalizing equal marriage’, Pink News 9 September: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/09/19/australia-votes-against-legalising-equal-marriage, accessed 20 September 2012.
G. Williams (2012) ‘States Leave Canberra Behind in Rush to Same-Sex Marriage’, The Age 19 September: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/states-leave-canberra-behind-in-rush-to-samesex-marriage-20120919-266wa.html, accessed 20 September 2012.
J. Green (2011) ‘French Parliament rejects Gay Marriage Bill’, Pink News14 June: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/06/14/french-parliament-rejects-gay-marriage-bill, accessed 15 June 2011.
S. Gray (2012) ‘The Times backs gay marriage’, Pink News 25 July: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/03/05/the-times-backs-gay-marriage, accessed 7 March 2012.
S. Gray (2012) ‘Scottish Government will bring forward equal marriage legislation’, Pink News 25 July: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/07/25/scottish-government-will-bring-forward-equal-marriage-legislation, accessed 26 July 2012.
S. Gray (2012) ‘Catholic Church in Scotland: Society “should not facilitate gay relationships”’, Pink News 26 July: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/07/26/catholic-church-in-scotland-society-should-not-facilitate-gay-relationships, accessed 27 July 2012.
T.S.K. Kong (2012) Chinese Male Homosexualities: Memba, Tongzhi and Golden Boy (London: Routledge), pp. 118–19.
M.C. Nussbaum (1999) Sex and Social Justice (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 201–3.
G. Simmel (1999 [1895]) ‘On the Sociology of the Family’, trans. M. Ritter and D. Frisby in M. Featherstone (ed.) Love and Eroticism (London: Sage), p. 291.
M. Warner (2000) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 61–80.
P. Moore (2004) Beyond Shame: Reclaiming the Abandoned History of Radical Gay Sexuality (Boston, MA: Beacon Press)
M.B. Sycamore (ed.) (2004) That’s Revolting! Queer Strategies for Resisting Assimilation (Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint LLC).
A.J. Cherlin (2004) ‘The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 855–6.
In the United States, different state jurisdictions use different terminology for formally recognising same-sex civil unions. See D.R. Pinello (2006) America’s Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 160–6.
P. Robinson (2008) The Changing World of Gay Men (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 76–83.
L. Jamieson (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 32–3.
C. Smart (2007) Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 13–16.
C. Smart (2008) ‘“Can I Be Bridesmaid?” Combining the Personal and Political in Same-Sex Weddings’, Sexualities, 11(6), 770–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Peter Robinson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, P. (2013). Marriage. In: Gay Men’s Relationships Across the Life Course. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314680_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314680_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31877-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31468-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)