Abstract
This chapter looks at the life stories of a group of 24 men whose long-lasting relationships resemble the companionate marriage in all but name. It is remarkable that, despite persistent, public stereotypes of youthful promiscuity or loneliness in old age and despite a long history of minimal social recognition of or support for gay, couple relationships, a substantial minority of a quarter of the men from the international sample (n = 97) provided evidence of gay men’s capacity to conduct stable, long-lasting relationships. It is remarkable also that these men’s relationships should so closely resemble the companionate marriage when in the five decades since the 1960s the couple relationship has undergone radical changes, becoming at the same time more flexible and subject to change and more fragile, less permanent.
We are one and the same person I think now. … We have turned into the same person — grumpy, difficult, intolerant [laughs] shouting at the TV.
(Bryce, aged 63, Manchester)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See P. Robinson (2008) The Changing World of Gay Men (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 125–8.
Z. Bauman (2003) Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds (Cambridge: Polity Press).
U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 5–9.
E. Beck-Gernsheim (2002) Reinventing the Family: In Search of New Lifestyles (Cambridge: Polity Press).
C. Smart (2007) Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 18–20.
E. Shorter (1976) The Making of the Modern Family (Glasgow: William Collins).
For discussion of changing shape of heterosexual couple relationships, see, for example, Z. Bauman (2003) Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds (Cambridge: Polity Press); U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love, trans. M. Ritter&J. Wiebel (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 5–9; and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2002) Reinventing the Family: In Search of New Lifestyles, trans. P. Camiller (Cambridge: Polity Press), passim. A useful critique of Beck and Beck-Gernsheim’s arguments about the shape and nature of contemporary relationships can be found in C. Smart (2007) Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 18–20. For the effects of individualisation on the couple relationship in the 1960s and 1970s, see E. Shorter (1976) The Making of the Modern Family (Glasgow: William Collins). For preliminary discussion of companionate marriage as a basis for couple relationships in Australian gay men, see Robinson Changing World, pp. 126–8.
A.J. Cherlin (2004) ‘The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 851.
L. Stone (1979) The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800, abridged&rev. edn (London: Penguin Books), pp. 217–24.
J. D’Emilio and E.B. Freedman (1997) Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 265–66.
Cherlin ‘The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage’, pp. 851–2; J. Murphy (2000) Imagining the Fifties: Private Sentiment and Political Culture in Menzies’ Australia (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press), p. 56.
B. Hewitt and J. Baxter (2012) ‘Who Gets Married in Australia? The Characteristics Associated with Transition to Marriage 2001–6’, Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 44–6;
L. Jamieson (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 32–3.
N. Elias (2000 [1939]) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, trans. E. Jephcott with some notes and corrections by the author. E. Dunning, J. Goudsblom, and S. Mennell (eds), rev. edn (Oxford: Blackwell); Beck and Beck-Gernsheim The Normal Chaos of Love; Beck- Gernsheim Reinventing the Family; Bauman Liquid Love.
E. Illouz (1999) ‘The Lost Innocence of Love: Romance As a Postmodern Condition’ in M. Featherstone (ed.) Love and Eroticism (London: Sage), p. 176;
Z. Bauman (2001) The Individualized Society (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 156.
A. Giddens (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 2, 58, passim.
D. Altman (1972) Homosexual: Oppression and Liberation (Sydney: Angus&Robertson), pp. 17–18.
M. Foucault (2000) ‘Sexual Choice, Sexual Act’ (1982–3) in Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 1, trans. R. Hurley and others, ed. P. Rabinow (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books), p. 150;
W.H. Masters and V.E. Johnson (1979) Homosexuality in Perspective (Boston: Little, Brown), pp. 229–30.
K. Plummer (1981) ‘Going Gay: Identities, Lifecycles and Lifestyles in the Male Gay World’ in J. Hart and D. Richardson (eds) The Theory and Practice of Homosexuality (London: Routledge&Kegan Paul), p. 105;
M. Pollak (1986) ‘Male Homosexuality—or Happiness in the Ghetto’ in P. Aries and A. Béjin (eds) Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, trans. A. Forster (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), pp. 43, 51;
R. Robertson (1981) ‘Young Gays’ in J. Hart and D. Richardson (eds) The Theory and Practice of Homosexuality (London: Routledge&Kegan Paul), p. 173;
D. J. West (1968) Homosexuality (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books), p. 56.
J. Boswell (1980) Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 26–7.
Other scholars use a related concept, ‘cosiness’, as a criterion for companionate marriage. See, for example, J. Finch and P. Summerfield (1999) ‘Social Reconstruction and the Emergence of Companionate Marriage, 1945–59’ in G. Allan (ed.) The Sociology of the Family: A Reader, (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.), pp. 23–5.
For more discussion of men’s expectation of independence in relationships, see B.D. Adam (2007) ‘Relationship Innovation in Male Couples’ in M. Kimmel (ed.) The Sexual Self: The Construction of Sexual Scripts (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press), pp. 122–40.
R.W. Connell (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
P. Bourdieu (2001) Masculine Domination, trans. R. Nice (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 50–2.
J. Hawley ‘Dark Night of the Soul’, Saturday Age 3 November 2012, Good Weekend supplement, p. 24.
S. Roseneil (2006) ‘On Not Living with a Partner: Unpicking Coupledom and Cohabitation’, Sociological Research On-Line: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/roseneil.html, accessed 9 December 2012.
J. Rechy (1977) The Sexual Outlaw: A Documentary (New York: Grove Press Inc.),
D. Hanson (ed.) (2011) Tom of Finland: The Comics, vol. 1 (Koln: Taschen GmbH).
see G. Herdt (1997) Same Sex, Different Cultures: Exploring Gay and Lesbian Lives (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), p. 154;
A. McLaren (1999) Twentieth Century Sexuality: A History (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 191.
J. Weeks (2007) The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life (Oxford: Routledge), p. 218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Peter Robinson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, P. (2013). Long-Lasting Relationships. In: Gay Men’s Relationships Across the Life Course. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314680_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314680_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31877-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31468-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)