Advertisement

‘A new species of swindling’: Coiners, Fraudsters, Swindlers and the ‘Long-Firm’, c. 1760–1913

Chapter
  • 506 Downloads

Abstract

During the long nineteenth century new paradigms of organised and professional crime were framed through the changing prosecution of fraud and forgery, coining and other forms of financial crime. As previous chapters have argued, the records provide only fragmentary evidence of criminal networks and confederacies, suggesting that the existence of organised criminal gangs is far from clear-cut. However, from this period, in the records of the police, the press and the writings of social investigators, a language evolved that described gangs of swindlers, coiners and fraudsters through the rhetoric of criminal organisation, perpetuating an increasingly dramatic shadow world of professional criminals. From the later eighteenth century, financial crimes were seen as increasing in pace with the growth of commerce and banking in the metropolis. Thus, in 1796 Patrick Colquhoun lamented, ‘It is not to be wondered at in a country where commerce and manufactures have arrived at such a height, and where from the opulence of the people the interchange of property is so extensive, that forgeries and frauds should prevail in a certain degree.’2

Keywords

Nineteenth Century Criminal Organisation Organise Crime Financial Crime Commercial Traveller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Robb, White-Collar Crime. J. Locker (2005), ‘“Quiet thieves, quiet punishment”: Private Responses to the “Respectable” offender, c. 1850–1930’, Crime, Histoire et Sociétés, 9, 1, pp. 9–31;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Sindall (1983), ‘Middle Class Crime in Nineteenth-Century England’, Criminal Justice History, 4, pp. 23–40;Google Scholar
  3. G. Wilson and S. Wilson (2007), ‘“Getting away with it” or “Punishment enough”?: The Problem of “Respectable” Crime from 1830’, in J. Moore and J. Smith (eds.), Corruption in Urban Politics and Society, 1780–1950 (Aldergate: Ashgate), pp. 57–78;Google Scholar
  4. S. Wilson (2003), ‘Moral Cancers: Fraud and Respectable Crime’, in J. Rowbotham and K. Stevenson (eds.), Behaving Badly: Social Panic and Moral Outrage — Victorian and Modern Parallels (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 97–111.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    See B. Godfrey and J. Locker (2001), ‘The Nineteenth-Century Decline of Custom and its Impact on Theories of “Workplace Theft” and “White-Collar Crime”’, Northern History, 38, pp. 261–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    G. Davies (2002), A History of Money from Ancient Times to the Present Day (Cardiff: University of Wales Press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robb, White-Collar Crime; for definitions see S. Wilson (2010), ‘Fraud and White-Collar Crime: 1850 to the Present’, in A. M. Kilday and D. Nash (eds.), Histories of Crime: Britain, 1600–2000 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 141–59.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    V. A. C. Gatrell (1980), ‘The Decline of Theft and Violence in Victorian and Edwardian England’, in Gatrell, Lenman and Parker , Crime and the Law, pp. 238–337, pp. 323–25.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    R. McGowen (1999), ‘From Pillory to Gallows: The Punishment of Forgery in the Age of the Financial Revolution’, Past and Present, 165, 1, pp. 107–40; Langbein, Origins, pp. 166–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 13.
    R. McGowen (2002), ‘Forgery Legislation in Eighteenth-Century England’, in N. Landau (ed.), Law, Crime and Society, 1660–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 117–38, pp. 131–2.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    See D. T. Andrew and R. McGowen (2001), The Perreaus and Mrs Rudd: Forgery and Betrayal in Eighteenth-Century London (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    R. McGowen (2007), ‘Managing the Gallows: The Bank of England and the Death Penalty, 1797–1821’, Law and History Review, 25, 2, pp. 241–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. See also, R. McGowen (2005), ‘The Bank of England and the Policing of Forgery 1797–1821’, Past and Present, 186, pp. 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 26.
    P. Handler (2005), ‘Forgery and the End of the “Bloody Code” in Early Nineteenth-Century England’, The Historical Journal, 48, 3, pp. 683–702, see p. 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 29.
    S. Petrow (1993), ‘The Rise of the Detective in London, 1869–1914’, Criminal Justice History, 14, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
  16. Also M. Fido and K. Skinner (2000), The Official Encyclopaedia of Scotland Yard: Behind the Scenes at Scotland Yard (London: Virgin Publishing), pp. 68–9; Shpayer Makov, Ascent, p. 32.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    G. Dilnot (1928), The Trial of the Detectives (London: Geoffrey Bles). See also Shpayer Makov, Ascent, p. 38, passim.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    See ‘The Detection of Crime’, The Times, 12 February 1884; R. M. Morris (2006), ‘“Crime Does Not Pay”: Thinking Again About Detectives in the First Century of the Metropolitan Police’, in C. Emsley and H. Shpayer-Makov, Police Detectives in History, 1750–1950 (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 79–102.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    The fullest account of the robbery can be found in G. Dilnot (1930), The Trial of Jim the Penman (London: Geoffrey Bles). A more recent treatment can be found in Thomas, Victorian Underworld.Google Scholar
  20. 42.
    Gaskill, Crime, p. 125; J. Styles (1980), ‘“Our traitorous money makers”: The Yorkshire Coiners and the Law, 1760–83’, in J. Brewer and J. Styles (eds.), An Ungovernable People? The English and their Law in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (London: Hutchinson), pp. 172–249.Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    This was related to the ‘Great Recoinage’ of the 1690s. A. Macfarlane (1981), The Justice and the Mare’s Ale: Law and Disorder in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  22. 47.
    D. Philips (1977), Crime and Authority in Victorian England: The Black Country, 1835–1860 (London: Taylor & Francis), pp. 228–9.Google Scholar
  23. 52.
    L. Zedner (1991), Women, Crime and Custody in Victorian England (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 39, 313, 315.Google Scholar
  24. 57.
    J. Grant (1838), Sketches in London (London: Ward Lock), pp. 401, 402; J. Garwood (1853), The Million-Peopled City (London: Wertheim and Macintosh), p. 46;Google Scholar
  25. T. Archer (1865), The Pauper, the Thief and the Convict (London: Groombridge & Sons), p. 77.Google Scholar
  26. 58.
    Wensley, Detective Days, pp. 141–2; G. W. Cornish (1935), Cornish of the ‘Yard’ (London: Bodley Head), pp. 24–7.Google Scholar
  27. 59.
    See W. M. Meier (2011), Property Crime in London, 1850 to the Present (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 15, 16, 47; Shpayer Makov, Ascent, p. 293. See the debate about the extent of professional crime between the High Court Judge Alfred Wills and the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Robert Anderson in The Times, 12, 21 February, 22 April, 1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 70.
    S. Petrow (1994), Policing Morals: The Metropolitan Police and the Home Office, 1870–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), p. 57. See TNA: HO45/9442/66692, ‘State, Discipline and Organisation of the Detective Force of the Metropolitan Police. Report of the Departmental Commission and subsequent Rules’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 79.
    Political Examiner, 10 January 1857. The ‘barrister Saward’ was referred to at the trial of Pierce, Burgess and Tester (OBP, January 1857, William Pierce, James Burgess and William George Tester (t18570105–250)). Agar had sold him 500oz of the stolen gold. Saward was tried at the Old Bailey in March 1857, on a charge of forgery. OBP, March 1857, James Townshend Saward and James Anderson (t18570302–413). See the recent biography by his descendent J. Carnell (2011), James Townsend Saward, Criminal Barrister (Hastings: Sensation Press);Google Scholar
  30. also D. Donovan (1901), Jim the Penman: The Life Story of One of the Most Astounding Criminals That Have Ever Lived (London: George Newnes); Dilnot, Trial of Jim the Penman; Thomas, Victorian Underworld, pp. 229–37; Fido and Skinner, Scotland Yard, p. 177.Google Scholar
  31. 86.
    Daily News, 28 April 1860. OBP, May 1860, William George Pullinger (t18600507–466). J. E. Ritchie (1860), About London (London: William Tinsley), p. 151.Google Scholar
  32. 88.
    C. L. Young (1886), Jim the Penman (New York: S. French). See also ‘The History of “Jim the Penman”’, New York Times, 8 May 1910;Google Scholar
  33. J. B. Clapp and E. F. Edgett (1902), Plays of the Present (New York: Dunlap Society).Google Scholar
  34. 89.
    Meier, Property Crime, pp. 87, 106–7; A. Wright (2006), Organised Crime: Concept, Cases, Control (Cullompton: Willan), p. 169.Google Scholar
  35. 91.
    M. Levi (1981), The Phantom Capitalists: The Organisation and Control of Long-Firm Fraud (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  36. 94.
    Levi, Phantom, p. 13. For the Hevey case see, R. N. Gooderson (1952), ‘When is a Document False in the Law of Forgery?’, Modern Law Review, 15, 1, pp. 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 98.
    G. Crossick (1977), ‘The Emergence of the Lower Middle Class in Britain’, in G. Crossick (ed.), The Lower Middle Class in Britain, 1870–1914 (London: Croom Helm), pp. 11–60, 19–20.Google Scholar
  38. 101.
    J. Caminada (1895), Twenty Five Years of Detective Life (Manchester: J. Heywood), pp. 361–3.Google Scholar
  39. 119.
    OBP, May 1876, James Humphries, Henry Smith, Edward Houghton and Mary Robinson (t18760529–389). Pay was also involved in raiding and prosecuting disorderly houses, see TNA: HO45/9511/17216, Police Report, ‘C’ Division, by James Pay, Inspector (1863, not dated), cited in H. Cocks (2003), Nameless Offences: Homosexual Desire in the Nineteenth Century (London: I. B. Tauris), p. 206.Google Scholar
  40. 123.
    Levi, Phantom, p. 20, more generally pp. 19–28. R. Reushel (1895), The Knights of Industry (London).Google Scholar
  41. 124.
    OBP, March 1895, Stanilaus Reuschel (t18950325–304); see related trials, OBP, February 1895, Stein Semansky (t18950225–258); May 1895, Gustav Opitz (t18950520–469). P. Knepper (2009), The Invention of International Crime: A Global Issue in the Making, 1881–1914 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. P. Knepper (2007), ‘British Jews and the Racialisation of Crime in the Age of Empire’, British Journal of Criminology, 47, pp. 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 139.
    This group has been neglected in the expansion of middle-class historiography. P. Bailey (1999), ‘White Collars, Gray Lives?: The Lower Middle Class Revisited’, Journal of British Studies, 38, pp. 273–90; Crossick, Lower Middle Class.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 140.
    G. L. Anderson (1977), ‘The Social Economy of Late-Victorian Clerks’, in Crossick , Lower Middle Class, pp. 113–33;Google Scholar
  45. M. Heller (2008), ‘Work, Income and Stability: The Late Victorian and Edwardian London Male Clerk Revisited’, Business History, 50, 3, pp. 253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 144.
    R. Church (2004), ‘The Rise and Changing Role of Commercial Travellers in Britain between 1870 and 1914’, unpublished paper given at EBHA Conference, http://www.econ.upf.edu/ebha2004/programme2.html, accessed 16 September 2014; M. French (2005), ‘Commercials, Careers and Culture: Travelling Salesmen in Britain, 1890s–1930s’, Economic History Review, 58, 2, pp. 352–77;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. M. French and Popp, A. (2008), ‘“Ambassadors of Commerce”: The Commercial Traveler in British Culture, 1800–1939’, Business History Review, 82, pp.789–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 154.
    Dick Hobbs has explored some of these firms in a slightly later chronology, in D. Hobbs (2001), ‘The Firm: Organisational Logic and Criminal Culture on a Shifting Terrain’, British Journal of Criminology, 41, pp. 549–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Heather Shore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations