Advertisement

‘Now we have the Informing Dogs!’: Crime Networks and Informing Cultures in the 1720s and 1730s

Chapter
  • 506 Downloads

Abstract

The criminal career of Jonathan Wild, executed at Tyburn on 24 May 1725, has for many commentators become a fixed point in the history of the underworld.2 Wild was a criminal, an informer, a thief-taker and a thief-maker; a man who artfully navigated the entrepreneurial justice system of the early eighteenth century. Our knowledge of Wild’s activities is shaped by the long repetition of his story in the print culture that he was said to have courted.3 His most thorough biographer, Gerald Howson noted, ‘Certainly he resembled the gangster of the twentieth century more closely than he did his famous contemporaries in Europe … He was the first criminal to become a “celebrity” …’.4 Indeed, Wild’s story is frequently re-imagined through the lens of later twentieth-century gang culture (in itself a constructed narrative), which reframes Wild as an eighteenth-century criminal mastermind.5 In this chapter I am less concerned with the reiteration of his story and more with the significance of the era as one in which Wild and his associates were able to thrive, and in which the ‘underworld’ narrative would find a more stable niche.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Criminal Network Grand Jury Early Eighteenth Century Criminal Gang 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Howson, Thief-Taker; L. Moore (1998), The Thieves’ Opera: The Remarkable Lives and Deaths of Jonathan Wild, Thief-taker and Jack Sheppard, House-breaker (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Not least by his most famous contemporary biographer, D. Defoe (1725, 2004 edn.), The True and Genuine Account of the Life and Actions of the Late Jonathan Wild (London: Harper Perennial).Google Scholar
  3. 13.
    J. M. Beattie (1986), Crime and the Courts in England, 1600–1800 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 136–7. For the decline of highway robbery in criminal biography, etc., see McKenzie, Tyburn’s Martyrs, pp. 115–20; Shoemaker, ‘Street Robber’.Google Scholar
  4. 15.
    E. Mackie (2009), Rakes, Highwaymen and Pirates: The Making of the Modern Gentleman in the Eighteenth Century (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press), p. 98.Google Scholar
  5. 17.
    R. Paley (1989), ‘Thief-takers in London in the Age of the McDaniel Gang, c. 1745–1754’, in Douglas Hay and Francis Snyder (eds.), Policing and Prosecution in Britain, 1750–1850 (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 301–41. See also, Beattie, Policing, pp. 406–14.Google Scholar
  6. 20.
    Shoemaker, ‘Print Culture’, p. 18; Faller, Turned to Account; P. Linebaugh (1977), ‘The Ordinary of Newgate and his Account’, in J. Cockburn (ed.), Crime in England 1550–1800 (London: Methuen);Google Scholar
  7. A. McKenzie (2005), ‘From True Confessions to True Reporting? The Decline and Fall of the Ordinary’s Account’, London Journal, 30, 1, pp. 55–70; McKenzie, Tyburn’s Martyrs;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Morgan and P. Rushton (2007), ‘Print Culture, Crime and Transportation in the Criminal Atlantic’, Continuity and Change, 2, 1, pp. 49–72;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Rawlings (1992), Drunks, Whores and Idle Apprentices: Criminal Biographies of the Eighteenth Century (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  10. On distribution, M. Harris (c. 1984), ‘Trials and Criminal Biographies: A Case Study in Distribution’, in R. Myers and M. Harris (eds.), Sale and Distribution of Books from 1700 (Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Press), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  11. 25.
    I. A. Bell (1991), Literature and Crime in Augustan England (London: Routledge), pp. 67–8, 80–4.Google Scholar
  12. 43.
    F. Dabhoiwala (2007), ‘Sex and Societies for Moral Reform, 1688–1800’, Journal of British Studies, 46, pp. 290–319, p. 290;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Hurl-Eamon (2004), ‘Policing Male Heterosexuality: The Reformation of Manners Societies’ Campaign Against the Brothels in Westminster, 1690–1720’, Journal of Social History, 37, 4, pp. 1017–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 44.
    Hurl-Eamon, ‘Policing’, p. 15; R. B. Shoemaker (1991), Prosecution and Punishment: Petty Crime and the Law in London and Rural Middlesex, c. 1660–1725 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),Google Scholar
  15. particularly chapter nine; R. B. Shoemaker (1992), ‘Reforming the City: The Reformation of Manners Campaign in London, 1690–1738’ in L. Davison et al. (eds.), Stilling the Grumbling Hive: The Response to Social and Economic Problems in England, 1689–1750 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
  16. 49.
    G. V. Portus (1912), Caritas Anglicana (London: Mowbray & Co), pp. 46–9.Google Scholar
  17. 51.
    Beattie, Policing, particularly Chapter 8, pp. 370–423; L. Radzinowicz (1956), A History of the English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750. Vol. 2: The Clash Between Private Initiative and Public Interest in the Enforcement of the Law (London: Stevens and Son);Google Scholar
  18. T. Wales (2000), ‘Thief-Takers and Their Clients in Later Stuart London’, in P. Griffiths and M. S. R. Jenner (eds.), Londonopolis: Essays in the Social and Cultural History of Early Modern London (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
  19. 53.
    R. Paulson (1993), Hogarth: Vol. 2, High Art and Low, 1732–1750 (Cambridge: Lutterworth Press), pp. 131–2, 140, 146, 147.Google Scholar
  20. 57.
    R. Norton (1992), Mother Clap’s Molly House: The Gay Subculture in England, 1700–1830 (London: GMP Publishers), pp. 54–69.Google Scholar
  21. 62.
    P. King (2000), Crime, Justice and Discretion in England, 1740–1820 (Oxford: Oxford University Press); Langbein, Origins;Google Scholar
  22. G. Morgan and P. Rushton (2003), ‘The Magistrate and the Community and the Maintenance of an Orderly Society in Eighteenth Century England’, Historical Research, 76, 191, pp. 54–77;Google Scholar
  23. D. Palk (2006), Gender, Crime and Judicial Discretion, 1780–1830 (Woodbridge: Royal Historical Society).Google Scholar
  24. 63.
    S. Webb and B. Webb (1906), English Local Government from the Revolution to the Municipal Corporations Act: The Parish and the County (London: Longmans, Green and Co.), p. 328. For the ‘trading justice’Google Scholar
  25. see J. Beattie (2007), ‘Sir John Fielding and Public Justice: The Bow Street Magistrates’ Court, 1754–1780’, Law and History Review, 25, pp. 61–100;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. N. Landau (1984), The Justice’s of the Peace, 1679–1760 (Berkeley: University of California Press);Google Scholar
  27. N. Landau (2002), ‘The Trading Justices Trade’, in N. Landau (ed.), Law, Crime and Society, 1660–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 46–70.Google Scholar
  28. 67.
    J. Innes (2009), Inferior Politics: Social Problems and Social Policies in Eighteenth-Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 279–341 for William Payne. See also J. Innes, ‘Payne, William (1717/18–1782)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, http://www. oxforddnb.com/view/article/70400, accessed 8 September 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 80.
    For social networking theory see J. S. McIllwain (1999), ‘Organized Crime: A Social Network Approach’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 32, pp. 301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 81.
    J. Warner, F. Ivis and A. Demers (2000), ‘A Predatory Social Structure: Informers in Westminster, 1737–1741’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 30, pp. 617–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 106.
    OBP, May 1728, William Russell, William Holden and Robert Crouch (t17280501–22); OBP, May 1728, Christopher Rawlins alias Thomas Rawlins, Isaac Ashley alias Ashby, and John Rowden alias Hulks (t17280501–30). See ONA, May 1728 (OA17280520); A. L. Hayward (1927), Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals (London: Routledge), pp. 438–44.Google Scholar
  32. 149.
    E. P. Thompson (1975), Whigs and Hunters (Pantheon: New York), p. 196.Google Scholar
  33. 150.
    A. Pepper (2011), ‘Early Crime Writing and the State: Jonathan Wild, Daniel Defoe and Bernard De Mandeville in 1720s London’, Textual Practice, 25, 3, pp. 473–91, p. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 151.
    J. Beattie (1995), ‘Crime and Inequality in Eighteenth-Century London’, in J. Hagan and R. D. Peterson (eds.), Crime and Inequality (California: Stanford University Press), p. 133.Google Scholar
  35. 153.
    D. Lemmings (2009), ‘Introduction: Law and Order, Moral Panics, and Early Modern England’, in D. Lemmings and C. Walker (eds.), Moral Panics, the Media and the Law in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1–21, p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Heather Shore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations