Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee ((BIG))

  • 358 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the question of duty and how it relates to the arguments for freedom from forced interaction presented above. Beginning with the assumption that there are some situations in which individuals have an enforceable obligation to contribute to a joint project, this book considers what limits JPA theory implies for the enforcement of duties. This discussion is largely a response to the objection to basic income on grounds variously described as “exploitation, “reciprocity, or “parasitism. Many political theorists have argued against policies are allowing people to receive an unconditional basic income. It takes labor to generate the social product from which basic income is drawn. Therefore, basic income recipients, supposedly, act as parasites, exploiting workers who contribute to the social product without making a reciprocal contribution to it.2

State what, in your opinion, is the best way to enlist colored men for soldiers.

—General Sherman (through his agent)

I think, sir, that all compulsory operations should be put a stop to. The ministers would talk to them, and the young men would enlist.

—Garrison Frazier1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E.D. Townsend, “Minutes of an Interview between the Colored Ministers and Church Officers at Savannah with the Secretary of War and Major-Gen. Sherman, in Freedom: A Documentary History of Emancipation, 1861–1867, ed. Steven F. Miller (College Park, MD: Department of History, University of Maryland, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elizabeth S. Anderson, “What Is the Point of Equality?, Ethics 109, no. 2 (January 1999): 287–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B.R. Bergmann, “A Swedish-Style Welfare State or Basic Income: Which Should Have Priority?, Politics and Society 32, no. 1 (2004): 107–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Elster, “Comment on Van der Veen and Van Parijs, Theory and Society 15, no. 5 (1986): 709–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gijs Van Donselaar, The Benefit of Another’s Pains: Parasitism, Scarcity, Basic Income (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Department of Philosophy, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gijs Van Donselaar, “The Stake and Exploitation, in The Ethics of Stakeholding, ed. K Dowding, Jurgen De Wispelaere, and S. White (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 94–113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gijs Van Donselaar, The Right to Exploit: Parasitism, Scarcity, and Basic Income (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Stuart White, “Liberal Equality, Exploitation, and the Case for an Unconditional Basic Income, Political Studies 45, no. 2 (1997): 312–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuart White, “Fair Reciprocity and Basic Income, in Real Libertarianism Assessed, ed. Andrew Reeve and Andrew Williams (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 136–60

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stuart White, The Civic Minimum (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. This example is essentially the same as Van Parijs’s Crazy-Lazy challenge. Philippe Van Parijs, Real Ereedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karl Widerquist, “Reciprocity and the Guaranteed Income, Politics and Society 33 (1999): 386–401

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karl Widerquist, “Does She Exploit or Doesn’t She?, in The Ethics and Economics of the Basic Income Guarantee, ed. Karl Widerquist, Michael A. Lewis, and Steven Pressman (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2005), pp. 138–62

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karl Widerquist, “Who Exploits Who?, Political Studies 54, no. 3 (October 2006): 444–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karl Widerquist, Property and the Power to Say No: A Freedom-Based Argument for Basic Income (Oxford University: Department of Politics and International Relations, 2006). The fourth of these references lays out some the property theory eluded to in this work. I hope to lay it out in greater detail in a future work.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Karl Widerquist

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Widerquist, K. (2013). On Duty. In: Independence, Propertylessness, and Basic Income. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313096_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics