Abstract
Even today, an examination of Kantian philosophy would not prove to be a belated endeavour. Two different editions of Kant’s works* have appeared in just the past few years, which amply testifies to the interest one still takes in the philosophical research of this thinker. Kant is not a forsaken celebrity history would have now consigned to oblivion. He still counts a not insignificant number of disciples who at least in part applaud his views. His principles have provided the basis for many of the subsequent philosophical creations. Many of his most distinctive doctrines have passed into the new systems and blend into them to such an extent that it is not an error to say that they permeate contemporary philosophy. That is why Hartenstein can write (in the Preface to the new edition of Kant’s Works, viii):
He (Kant) has the fortune … that subsequent systems are for the most part developments of seeds that can be more or less determinately demonstrated in his writings, even if from time to time inner deformations are concealed by the illusion of a luxurious abundance. Fichte’s idealism, which rests exclusively on the pure concept of the Ich; Schelling’s older identity-theory, which makes intellectual intuition the source of knowledge; Hegel’s dialectic; Herbart’s monadology, which is grounded on the concept of being as absolute positing and on the recognition of the given; notwithstanding the peculiarities of each of these thinkers, all these things bring to mind thoughts, questions, and problems that Kant either first moved clearly into the light of philosophical consideration, or without allowing them the least applicability for human thinking, designated them as possible sources of cognition for other intelligences, or finally held them as essential and necessary corrections of deeply rooted errors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Dr Fr. E. Beneke’s System der Logik, Berlin 1842, 1. Theil, 156f.;
Dr H. Ulrici’s Geschichte und Kritik der Principien der neueren Philosophie, Leipzig 1845, 304;
Dr Prantl’s Bedeutung der Logik, München 1849, 15, among others, where the division into analytic and synthetic judgements is directly called “an empty one”.
See G. Th. Fechner’s: Ueber das höchste Gut, Leipzig 1846.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 František Příhonský
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Příhonský, F. (2014). ’Neuer Anti-Kant oder Krüfung ber Kritik der reinen Vernunft nach den in Bolzano’s Wissenschaftslehre niebergelegten Begriffen / New Anti-Kant, Or Examination of the Critique of Pure Reason According to the Concepts Laid Down in Bolzano’s Theory of Science. In: Lapointe, S., Tolley, C. (eds) New Anti-Kant. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312655_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312655_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33189-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31265-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)