Skip to main content

Native Language, Target Language, and the Teaching and Learning of American Sign Language Vocabulary

  • Chapter
Teaching and Learning Signed Languages

Abstract

A contentious pedagogical issue in American Sign Language (ASL) as a foreign language is the use of spoken English as a medium in the teaching and learning of ASL vocabulary — in other words, whether or not teachers should use their voice while teaching ASL. A ‘voice-on’ approach entails the use of voicing and writing in learners’ native spoken English in addition to sign. In contrast, ‘voice-off’ instruction and learning entails the use of ASL signs and pictures and images but without the use of voicing and writing in spoken English. The issue is paralleled by debate over the use of native language (NL) or target language (TL) as a medium of instruction in foreign language classrooms (Turnbull & Arnett, 2002). The use of NL entails using the learners’ first language (L1), and the use of TL involves using the foreign (L2) language only. In the case of classrooms in ASL as a foreign language, NL refers to spoken and written English modalities and the TL is ASL. This chapter reports empirical studies of the use of NL and TL in the teaching and learning of vocabulary in ASL as a foreign language. The following section reviews relevant studies of spoken foreign language learning that provide context for the focus of the ASL studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrera, M. (2003). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new- or second- language learners with learning disabilities in high education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, A. (2011). Native language use and student achievement in L2 American Sign Language classrooms. Unpublished Master of Arts Project, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., Clark, J. L. D., Edwards, T. M., & Handrick, F. A. (1967). The Foreign Language Attainments of Language Majors in the Senior Years: A Survey Conducted in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, K. (2011). American Sign Language: Effects on student performance of teaching in target language versus native language in the classroom setting. Unpublished Master of Arts Project, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Annunzio, A. (1991). Using bilingual teachers and non-directive approaches in ESL: A follow-up report. Connections: A Journal of Adult Literacy, 4, 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFino, S. M. & Lombardino, L. J. (2004). Language learning disabilities: The ultimate foreign language challenge. Foreign Language Annals, 37(3), 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLouise, M. (2011). Modifying second language teaching strategies for students with visual processing disorders in an American Sign Language classroom. Unpublished Master of Arts Project, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinklage, K. T. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. In G. Blaine & C. McArthur (eds) Emotional Problems of the Student, pp. 185–206. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B. (2012). Looking for Learning: Auditory, Visual and Optomotor Processing of Children with Learning Problems. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., Sparks, R. L., & Javorsky, J. (1998). Foreign language learning difficulties: An historical perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(3), 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. (Third edition). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). From memory palaces to spacing algorithms: Approaches to second-language vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leons, E., Herbert C., & Gobbo, K. (2009). Students with learning disabilities and AD/HD in the foreign language classroom: Supporting students and instructors. Foreign Language Annals, 42(1), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linek, J., Kroll, J., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabbott, A. (1994). An exploration of reading comprehension, oral reading errors, and written errors by subjects labeled learning disabled. Foreign Language Annals, 27, 293–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrady, H. J. & Olson, D. A. (1970). Visual and auditory learning processes in normal children and children with specific learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 36(8), 581–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasecka, K. (1988). The bilingual teacher in the ESL classroom. In S. Nicholls & E. Hoadly-Maidment (eds), Current Issues in Teaching English as a Second Language to Adults, pp. 97–103. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (2008). American Sign Language as a foreign language in US high schools: State of the art. Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 10–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. & Manchon, R. (2007). Research on second language acquisition and learning: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), vii-xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamash, Y. (1990). Learning in translation: Beyond language experience in ESL. Voices, 2(2), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. L. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. L. (2009). If you don’t know where you’re going, you’ll wind up somewhere else: The case of ‘Foreign Language Learning Disability.’ Foreign Language Annals, 42(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. L. & Ganschow, L. (1993). The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 77, 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. L. & Ganschow, L. (1995). A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to MacIntyre. Modern Language Journal, 79, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992). Identifying native language deficits in high- and low-risk foreign language learners in high school. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Kenneweg, S., & Miller, K. (1991). Use of an Orton-Gillingham approach to teach a foreign language to dyslexic/learning disabled students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., & Phillips, L. (2005). Comparison of the performance of college students classified as ADHD, LD and LD/ADHD in foreign language courses. Language Learning, 55(1), 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2008). Early LI reading and spelling skills predict later L2 reading and spelling skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2006). Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohmeyer, B. & McGrail, L. (1988). On Focus: Photographs and Writings by Students. Boston, MA: El Centro del Cardenal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonzar, C., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2009). L2 Vocabulary acquisition in children: Effects of learning method and cognate status. Language Learning, 59(3), 623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, M. (2001). There is a role for the L1 in second and foreign language teaching, but The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 4, 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, M. & Arnett, K. (2002). Teachers’ uses of the target and first languages in second and foreign language classrooms. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Russell S. Rosen, Mary-Kate DeLouise, Amanda T. Boyle, and Kerry Daley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosen, R.S., DeLouise, MK., Boyle, A.T., Daley, K. (2014). Native Language, Target Language, and the Teaching and Learning of American Sign Language Vocabulary. In: McKee, D., Rosen, R.S., McKee, R. (eds) Teaching and Learning Signed Languages. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312495_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics