Skip to main content

Exploring Thick Description in Business System Analysis: The South Korean Business System from a European Corporate Perception

  • Chapter
Asian Inward and Outward FDI

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Asian Business Series ((PAMABS))

  • 655 Accesses

Abstract

Being aware of the need to support economic growth for local companies the European Union (EU) has been intensifying its global efforts to enhance trade relations. As of July 2011 a free trade agreement (FTA) between the EU and the Republic of Korea (hereafter South Korea or Korea) commenced (EC, 2012). This agreement is considered as ‘the most ambitious trade deal ever concluded by the EU’ (EC, 2013) and its first with an Asian country, aiming incrementally to eliminate import duties as well as non-tariff barriers and provide an extensive liberalization of trade in services (EC, 2009). Additionally liberalization of investment, both in majority of the service and non-service sectors, is covered by this agreement, reflecting a more inclusive approach to recent trade negotiations by the EU with economic partners. In this way the EU aims to open newly industrialized economies, especially in Asia, and its attractive growth potential to European companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, A. (2008) ‘Mergers and Acquisitions in Korea: The Leading Edge of Foreign Direct Investment,’ US-Korean Institution at SAIS, http://uskoreainstitute.org/ bin/g/o/KES08-02.pdf [accessed May 14, 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bendt, F. and Sanne, J. (2010) The Korean Business System: National Characteristics and the Impact of the FTA between Korea and the EU from a European Corporate Perception, Centre of International Business Studies, School of Business, Economics and Law at the University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler, L. and Hemmert, M. (2008) ‘Trust Formation in Korean New Product Alliances: How Important are Pre-existing Social Ties?,’ Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2): 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K., Lee, H. and Jung, K. (1997) Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyner, T. and Jang, S. (2007) Mastering Business in Korea: A Practical Guide (Seoul: Seoul Selection).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeg, R. (2005) ‘Path Dependency, Institutional Complementarily, and Change in National Business Systems,’ in G. Morgan, R. Whitley and E. Moen (eds), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 21–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetriades, P. and Fattouh, B. (1999) ‘The South Korean Financial Crisis: Competing Explanations and Policy Lessons for Financial Liberalization,’ International Affairs, 75(4): 779–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2007) Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy, 5th ed. (London: SAGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolles, H. (1997) Keiretsu: Emergenz, Struktur, Wettbewerbsstärke und Dynamik japanischer Verbundgruppen [Keiretsu: Emergence, Structure, Competitive Strengths and Organizational Dynamics of Corporate Groupings in Japan] (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolles, H. and Takahashi, Y. (2011) ‘The “Lost Decade” and Changes in the Japanese Business Environment: Consequences for Foreign Direct Investment and Human Resource Management in Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan,’ in S. Horn (ed.), Emerging Perspectives in Japanese Human Resource Management (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang): 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2009) ‘EU-Korea FTA: A Quick Reading Guide,’ European Commission, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/october/tradoc_145203. pdf [accessed February 10, 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2012) ‘Countries and Regions: South Korea,’ European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/countries/korea/[accessed January 29, 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2013) ‘EU-Korea FTA Sees Strong Rise in EU Exports,’ http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=931 [accessed July 30, 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. (1954) ‘The Critical Incident Technique,’ Psychological Bulletin, 51(4): 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. (1996) ‘Research in Strategy, Economics and Michael Porter,’ Journal of Management Studies, 33(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, P. (1996) ‘The Macropolitics of Microinstitutional Differences in the Analysis of Comparative Capitalism,’ in S. Berger and R. Dore (eds), National Diversity and Global Capitalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press): 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahm, C. (2003) ‘Law, Culture, and the Politics of Confucianism,’ Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 16(2): 254–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmert, M. (2008) ‘Innovation Management of Japanese and Korean Firms: A Comparative Analysis,’ Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(3): 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmert, M. (2012) Tiger Management: Korean Companies on World Markets (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. (2006) ‘Wage Structure and Skilled Development in Korea and Japan,’ Korean Labor Institute, http://www.jil.go.jp/profile/documents/Hwang.pdf [accessed February 21, 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. (2007) ‘Nation, State and the Modern Transformation of Korean Social Structure in the Early Twentieth Century,’ History Compass, 5(2): 330–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, K. (2001) ‘Sociocultural Change and Traditional Values: Confucian Values among Koreans and Korean Americans,’ International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(2): 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. and Deeg, R. (2008) ‘Comparing Capitalisms: Understanding Institutional Diversity and its Implications for International Business,’ Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 540–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977) ‘The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments,’ Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K. (2001) ‘Ownership and Governance Structure of Korean Business Groups,’ International Journal of Asian Management, 1(1): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. (2008) ‘The Capital Market Consolidation Act and the Korean Financial Market,’ in Korean Economy Institute and Korean Institute for International Economic Policy (ed.), Korea’s Economy, http://www.keia.org/Publications/KoreasEconomy/2008/Dong-hwan1.pdf [accessed March 6, 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Pan, Y. and Park, H. (1998) ‘High-Versus Low-Context Culture: A Comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American Cultures,’ Psychology & Marketing, 15(6): 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Hoskisson, R., Tihanyi, L. and Hong, J. (2004) ‘The Evolution and Restructuring of Diversified Business Groups in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from Chaebols in Korea,’ Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(1–2): 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. and Cheon, B. (2004) ‘Labor Market Flexibility and Social Safety Net in Korea,’ Presentation, Korea Labor Institute ADB-Korea Conference on Dynamic and Sustainable Growth in Korea and Asia, Seoul, May 14, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. and Lee, Y. (2007) The Korean Economy: The Challenges of FDI-led Globalization (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B.N. and Steinmann, H. (1989) ‘Managing Subsidiaries of German Companies in Japan: Some Findings of Adaptation Strategies,’ in K. Shibagaki, M. Trevor and T. Abo (eds), Japanese and European Management: Their International Adaptability (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press): 244–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B.N. and Steinmann, H. (1990) ‘Managing Japanese Subsidiaries of German Companies: Some Findings for Theory-building on Foreign Subsidiary Management in Japan,’ in J. Stam (ed.), Industrial Cooperation between Europe and Japan (Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press): 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B.N., Steinmann, H. and Dolles, H. (1993) ‘Das Management in Niederlassungen deutscher Unternehmen in Japan — eine empirische Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Klein- und Mittelbetrieben [Subsidiary Management of German Companies in Japan. An Empirical Investigation with a Focus on Small and Medium-sized Companies],’ Diskussionsbeitrag des Lehrstuhls für Betriebswirtschaftslehre insbesondere Internationales Management (Prof. Dr. Brij N. Kumar), no. 2, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuernberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, O. (2007) ‘South Korea,’ in A. Chowdhury and I. Islam (eds), Handbook on the Northeast and Southeast Asian Economies (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Lee, K. and Lee, K. (2002) ‘Chaebols, Financial Liberalization and Economic Crisis: Transformation of Quasi-Internal Organization in Korea,’ Asian Economic Journal, 16(1): 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2002) Education Policy in the Republic of Korea: Building Block or Stumbling Block?, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and The World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/wbi37164.pdf [accessed February 15, 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. and Hobday, M. (2003) ‘Korea’s New Globalization Strategy: Can Korea Become a Business in Northeast Asia?,’ Management Decision, 41(5): 498–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Peuker, M. (2007) ‘A Heuristic Attempt at Understanding Economic Action in South Korea,’ International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7(3): 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morden, T. and Bowles, D. (1998) ‘Management in South Korea: A Review,’ Management Decision, 36(5): 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. (2003) ‘Intergenerational Social Mobility among Korean Men in Comparative Perspective,’ Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 20: 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S.C., Alvstam, C.G., Dolles, H. and Ström, P. (2013) ‘Samsung Electronics: From “National Champion” to “Global Leader,”’ in C.G. Alvstam, H. Dolles and P. Ström (eds), Asian Inward and Outward FDI: New Challenges in the Global Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan): 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, I. (2009) ‘The Political and Social Economy of Care in the Republic of Korea: Gender and Development Programme Paper,’ United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf [accessed February 22, 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (2000) ‘Attitudes, Values and Beliefs and the Microeconomics of Prosperity,’ in L. Harrison and S. Huntington (eds), Culture Matters (New York: Basic Books): 14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, L. (2010) ‘Culture, Government and Development in South Korea,’ Asian Culture and History, 2(1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. (2002) ‘Incorporating Culture Into the Explanatory Framework for Divergent Capitalisms,’ in D. Sachsenmaier, J. Riedel and S. Eisenstadt (eds), Reflections on Multiple Modernities (Leiden: Brill): 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. (2005) ‘The Thick Description and Comparison of Societal Systems of Capitalism,’ Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 123–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. (2006) ‘Asia and its Actors, their Logic and the Challenges,’ in S. Söderman (ed.), Emerging Multiplicity: Integration and Responsiveness in Asian Business Development (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan): 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. (2009) ‘The Business Systems of Asia,’ in H. Hasegawa and C. Noronha (eds), Asian Business and Management: Theory, Practice and Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. and Witt, M. (2004) The Role of Executive Rationale in the Comparison of Capitalisms: Some Preliminary Findings, Working Paper of the Euro Asia and Comparative Research Centre, INSEAD, Fontainebleau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G. and Witt, M. (2007) The Future of Chinese Capitalism: Choices and Chances (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. and Sala-i-Martín, X. (2009) The Global Competitiveness Report 20092010 (Geneva: World Economic Forum), http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2009-10.pdf [accessed July 28, 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. and Sala-i-Martín, X. (2012) The Global Competitiveness Report 20122013 (Geneva: World Economic Forum), http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf [accessed July 28, 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2004) ‘Government Intervention or Market Liberalization: The Korean Financial Crisis as a Case of Market Failure,’ Progress in Development Studies, 4(1): 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui-Auch, L. and Lee, Y. (2003) ‘The State Matters: Management Models of Singaporean Chinese and Korean Business Groups,’ Organization Studies, 24(4): 507–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, F. and Van Prooijen, A. (1992) ‘The Competitive Advantage of European Nations: The Impact of National Culture — A Missing Element in Porter’s Analysis?,’ European Management Journal, 10(2): 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. (2006) ‘Bridging IB Theories, Constructs and Methods across Cultures and Social Sciences,’ Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2): 280–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. and Galunic, C. (2003) ‘A Theory of the Cultural Evolution of the Firm: The Intra-Organizational Ecology of Memes,’ Organization Studies, 24(8): 1309–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1991) ‘The Social Construction of Business Systems in East Asia,’ Organization Studies, 12(1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1992) Business System in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies (London: SAGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1998) ‘Internationalization and Varieties of Capitalism: The Limited Effects of Cross-national Coordination of Economic Activities on the Nature of Business Systems,’ Review of International Political Economy, 5(3): 445–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999) Divergent Capitalism: The Social Structuring and Change of Business System (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2005a) ‘Developing Transnational Organizational Capabilities in Multinational Companies: Institutional Constraints on Authority Sharing and Careers in Six Types of MNC,’ in G. Morgan, R. Whitley and E. Moen (eds), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 235–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2005b) ‘How National are Business Systems? The Role of States and Complementary Institutions in Standardizing Systems of Economic Coordination and Control at the National Level,’ in G. Morgan, R. Whitley and E. Moen (eds), Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 190–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagimachi, I. (2004) ‘Chaebol Reform and Corporate Governance in Korea,’ Presentation at 1st Keio-UNU-JFIR Panel Meeting ‘Economic Development and Human Security: How to Improve Governance at the Inter-Governmental, Governmental and Private Sector Levels in Japan and Asia,’ Keio University, Tokyo, February 13–14, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetton, P. (1992) ‘Are Diamonds a Country’s Best Friend? A Critique of Porter’s Theory of National Competition as Applied to Canada, New Zealand and Australia,’ Australian Journal of Management, 17(1): 89–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, B. (2005) ‘Labor Militancy in South Korea,’ Asian Economic Journal, 19(2): 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Flora Bendt, Joakim Sanne and Harald Dolles

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bendt, F., Sanne, J., Dolles, H. (2014). Exploring Thick Description in Business System Analysis: The South Korean Business System from a European Corporate Perception. In: Alvstam, C.G., Dolles, H., Ström, P. (eds) Asian Inward and Outward FDI. Palgrave Macmillan Asian Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312211_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics