Abstract
While there is no single way of being Indigenous any more than there is a single way to be Western, there are commonalities in what could be called “related worldviews”. The various numbers of Indigenous communities in North, Central and South America alone defy any ability to make universal claims. Indeed, even within a single community, world-views may vary. The complexity of worldviews is further complicated by the fact that some Indigenous communities have been or are split arbitrarily by the physical borders of other cultures. In addition, these communities have been, and are, divided by a multitude of historic, sociologic and economic factors. Discussions involving multiple populations and communities potentially create an infinite set of dimensions, which can frustrate communication. Given the complexities and differences in origin, history and social order, it is impossible to give any single set of rules that would serve as a model for borderland discussions. This chapter does not presume to speak for all communities or all Indigenous people. What is offered is an interpretation of some commonalities that may assist those participating in intercultural communication. The concepts are offered with respect and the understanding that not all Indigenous people will support every claim and some may adhere to worldviews not discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Basso, K. (1990). Western Apache Language and Culture: Essays in Linguistic Anthropology. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Basso, K. (1996). Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
Beck, P. V. and Walters, A. L. and Francisco, N. (1992). The Sacred: Ways of Knowledge, Sources of Life. Navajo Community College Press, Tsaile, AZ.
Cajete, G. (2004). Look to the Mountain: An Ecology of Indigenous Education. Kivaki Press, North Carolina.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native Science: Native Laws of Interdependence. Clear Light, Santa Fe, NM.
Deloria, Jr., V. (2003). God Is Red: A Native View of Religion. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, CO.
Deloria, Jr., V. (2006). The World We Used to Live In: Remembering the Powers of the Medicine Men. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, CO.
Deloria, Jr., V. and Wildcat, D. (2001). Power and Place: Indian Education in America. American Indian Graduate Center and Fulcrum Resources, Golden, CO.
Four Arrows and Cajete, G. and Lee, J. (2010). Critical Neurophilosophy and Indigenous Wisdom. Sense Publishers, The Netherlands.
Galloway, J. M., Goldberg, B. W. and Alpert, J. S. (1999). Primary Care of Native American Patients: Diagnosis, Therapy, and Epidemiology. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, MA.
Jammer, M. (1972). “Energy”. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 1. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. & The Free Press, New York.
Locust, C. and Lang, J. (1996). “Walking Two Worlds: Native Americans and the VR system”. American Rehabilitation. Vol. 22, Issue 2, Summer 1996.
Lovern, L. (2008). “Native American Worldview and the Discourse on Disability”. Essays in Philosophy. Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2008. The Department of Philosophy, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.
Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. (1991). “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion and Motivation”. Psychology Review. Vol. 98, No. 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Spector, R. E. (1979). Cultural Diversity in Health and Illness. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Swindler, A. (1986). “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies”. American Sociological Review. Vol. 51, No. 2. April, 1986.
Thompson, V. C. (1997). “Independent and Interdependent Views of Self: Implications for Culturally Sensitive Vocational Rehabilitation Services”. The Journal of Rehabilitation. Vol. 63, No. 4.
Wahinkpe Topa. (Four Arrows), ed. (2006). Unlearning the Language of Conquest: Scholars Expose Anti-Indianism in America. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
Wendell, S. (2008). “Toward a Feminist Theory of Disability”. The Feminist Philosophy Reader. Eds. A. Bailey and C. Cuomo. McGrawHill, Boston, MA.
Copyright information
© 2013 Lavonna L. Lovern and Carol Locust
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovern, L.L., Locust, C. (2013). A Few Commonalities of Connectivity, Energies and Ethics. In: Native American Communities on Health and Disability. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312020_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312020_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45606-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31202-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)