Skip to main content

There but for the Grace of God Go I

  • Chapter
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

I’ve listened to many public defenders talk about why they repre­sent poor people charged with crimes. Some of them talk about being inspired by the experience of a brother, cousin, or friend who was arrested and treated unfairly in the criminal justice system. Others speak of a desire to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and fight the power of government. Still others are motivated by a desire to help the poor and disadvantaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The following reports prepared by The Sentencing Project are just a few of the many articles that discuss the issues black men face in our criminal justice system: Tushar Kansal, Racial Disparity in Sentencing: A Review of the Literature (The Sentencing Project, January 2005), http://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/sp/disparity.pdf;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mark Mauer, The Crisis of the Young African American Male and the Criminal Justice System, (The Sentencing Project, April 15–16, 1999), http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/rd_crisisoftheyoung.pdf;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mark Mauer and Tracy Huling, Young Black Americans and the Criminal Justice System: Five Years Later (The Sentencing Project, October 1995), http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/rd_youngblack_5yrslater.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Angela J. Davis, Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 123–141;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angela J. Davis, Racial Fairness in the Criminal Justice System: The Role of the Prosecutor, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 39 (2007);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Angela J. Davis, “Prosecution and Race: The Power and Privilege of Discretion,” Fordham Law Review 67 (1998);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce A. Green, “Why Should Prosecutors ‘Seek Justice’?,” Fordham Urban Law Journal 26 (1999);

    Google Scholar 

  8. James Vorenburg, “Decent Restraint of Prosecutorial Power,” Harvard Law Review 94 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I disagreed then and still disagree with the view of Abbe Smith and Paul Butler that “good people can’t be prosecutors.” See Paul Butler, Let’s Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice (New York: New Press, 2009), 101–121;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abbe Smith, “Can You Be a Good Person and a Good Prosecutor?,” Georgetown Law Journal 14 (2001);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kenneth B. Nunn, “The ‘Darden Dilemma’: Should African-Americans Prosecute Crimes?,” Fordham Law Review 68 (2000);

    Google Scholar 

  12. cf. Lenese C. Herbert, “Et in Arcadia Ego: A Perspective on Black Prosecutors’ Loyalty within the American Criminal Justice System,” Howard Law Journal 49 (2006);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., “Changing the System from Within: An Essay Calling on More African-Americans to Consider Being Prosecutors,” Widener Law Symposium Journal 6 (Fall 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas H. Cohen and Tracey Kyckelhahn, Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2006 (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2010), 10, http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/fdluc06.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.C. Rules of Prof’l Conduct R. 3.8 (“Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor”) (2012). For examples ofthe types ofprosecutorial misconduct that result in discipline, see Davis, Arbitrary Justice, 123–141; Neil Gordon, “Misconduct and Punishment,” The Center for Public Integrity, last modified June 26, 2003, http://www.iwatchnews.org/2003/06/26/5532 /misconduct-and-punishment;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duff Wilson, “Prosecutor in Duke Case Disbarred by Ethics Panel,” New York Times, June 17, 2007, http:// www.nytimes.com/2007/06/17/us/17duke.html#;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ken Armstrong and Maurice Possley, “Part 1: The Verdict: Dishonor,” Chicago Tribune January 11, 1999, http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/watchdog/chi-020103trial1,0,1561461,full.story; People v. Mackell, 47 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975), aff’d, 351 N.E.2d 684 (N.Y. 1976) (discussing prosecutorial misconduct that resulted in criminal prosecution); United States v. Pacheco-Ortiz, 889 F.2d 301, 310–11 (1st Cir. 1989) (describing nonjudicial sanctions for prosecutorial misconduct); Price v. State Bar of Cal., 638 P.2d 1311 (Cal. 1982) (suspending a prosecutor from practicing law for five years when he promised to seek a favorable sentence for a defendant if the defendant agreed not to appeal his conviction); In re G. Paul Howes, 39 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2012) (disbarring a prosecutor who wrongfully distributed witness vouchers, failed to disclose the payments to the court or opposing counsel, and intentionally made misrepresentations to the court that the disclosures had been made).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Abbe Smith Monroe H. Freedman

Copyright information

© 2013 Abbe Smith and Monroe H. Freedman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, A.J. (2013). There but for the Grace of God Go I. In: Smith, A., Freedman, M.H. (eds) How Can You Represent Those People?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311955_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics