Abstract
The Singapore River and its environs have seemingly gone through a constant process of change since 1983, when the river ceased to have any further role in the port activities of Singapore. In September of that year, the ubiquitous lighters that since the time of Raffles had plied the waters of the river and harbor left the heart of the city for the last time. Their departure marked the end of an important epoch for the river in Singapore’s modern history. For more than 150 years, the lighterage industry had been an integral part of the port and riverine activities. The industry’s removal from the river was a result of wider changes that were taking place in Singapore and which were completely transforming the economic, urban, and social environments of the island state. Ten years after the removal of the lighterage industry from the Singapore River, while researching a history of the waterway and its role in Singapore’s past, I was able to meet some of the few remaining river lightermen and lighter owners, then based at facilities in Pasir Panjang, on the southwest shore of the island. Over a period of approximately six months, I was able to conduct oral history interviews with owners of lighters and some of their employees. I also had the opportunity to venture out into the harbor and observe the nature of the work lightermen were engaged in firsthand. The contacts I established provided me with visits to Pulau Retan Laut, now absorbed by the enormous Pasir Panjang Container Terminal, where lighters were taken for repair.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alessandro Portelli, The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1997).
Alessandro Portelli, “The Peculiarities of Oral History,” History Workshop Journal 12.1 (1981): 99–100.
Sharon Roseman, “‘How We Built the Road’: The Politics of Memory in Rural Galacia,” American Ethnologist 23.4 (1996): 839.
Ernest Wee Song Koh, Singapore Stories: Language, Class and the Chinese of Singapore1945 to 2000 (Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 2010), p. 1.
Kevin Blackburn, “Oral History as a Product of Malleable and Shifting Memories in Singapore,” in The Makers and Keepers of Singapore History, ed. Loh Kah Seng and Liew Kai Khiun (Singapore: Ethos Books, 2010), p. 207.
Goh Keng Swee, minister for finance, Singapore Legislative Assembly Debates, December 14, 1959, p. 1174.
C. Mary Turnbull, A History of Singapore, 1819–1988, 2nd edition (Singapore; New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 288.
Peggy Teo and Shirlena Huang, “Tourism and Heritage Conservation in Singapore,” Annals of Tourism Research 22.3 (1995): 593.
For a fuller discussion of these processes see Brian Field, “Singapore’s New Town Prototype: A Textbook Prescription?” Habitat International 16.3 (1992); Foo Tuan Seik, “Urban Environmental Policy—The Use of Regulatory and Economic Instruments in Singapore,” Habitat International 20.1 (1996). Also, Kah Seng Loh, The 1961 Kampong Bukit Ho Swee Fire and the Making of Modern Singapore, PhD diss., Murdoch University, 2009.
See extended discussion in Stephen Dobbs, The Singapore River: A Social History, 1819–2002 (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2003).
T. C. Chang and Shirlena Huang, “Recreating Place, Replacing Memory: Creative Destruction at the Singapore River,” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 46.3 (2005): 272.
Public Works Department, Copy of Minute from the Prime Minister to Wong Chooi Sen, March 26, 1969, 223/53, Vol. V.
Shigeharu Tanabe and Charles F. Keyes, “Introduction,” in Cultural Crisis and Social Memory: Modernity and Identity in Thailand and Laos, ed. Shigeharu Tanabe and Charles F. Keyes (Anthropology of Asia series; London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002), pp. 2–6.
Ministry of Information and the Arts, The Renaissance City Report (Singapore: Ministry of Information and the Arts, 2000).
Brenda S. A. Yeoh, “Cosmopolitanism and Its Exclusions in Singapore,” Urban Studies 41.12 (2004): 2434.
Urban Redevelopment Authority, Living the Next Lap: Towards a Tropical City of Excellence (Singapore: Urban Redevelopment Authority, 1991), p. 25.
Brenda S. A. Yeoh and Lily Kong, “Reading Landscape Meanings: State Constructions and Lived Experiences in Singapore’s Chinatown,” Habitat International 18.4 (1994): 29.
Sharon MacDonald, “Undesirable Heritage: Fascist Material Culture and Historical Consciousness in Nuremberg,” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12.1 (2006): 11.
Tim Winter, Post-Conflict Heritage, Postcolonial Tourism: Culture, Politics and Development at Angkor (Routledge studies in Asia’s transformation; Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2007), p. 40.
Laurajane Smith and Natsuko Akagawa, eds., Intangible Heritage (London, New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. 3–4.
David Lowenthal, “Past Time, Present Place: Landscape and Memory,” Geographical Review 65.1 (1975): 30.
Peter Fritzsche, “Specters of History: On Nostalgia, Exile, and Modernity,” The American Historical Review 106.5 (2001): 1617.
Popular Memory Group, “Popular Memory Theory, Politics, Method,” in The Oral History Reader, ed. Robert Perks and Alistair Thompson, 2nd edition (London; New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 44–45.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Kah Seng Loh, Stephen Dobbs, and Ernest Koh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dobbs, S. (2013). Memory, Heritage, and the Singapore River: “It Is Like a Dead Snake”. In: Loh, K.S., Dobbs, S., Koh, E. (eds) Oral History in Southeast Asia. PALGRAVE Studies in Oral History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311672_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311672_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45703-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31167-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)