Abstract
The clamour in the early years of new media studies to coin neologisms such as ‘viewser’ (viewer and user) or ‘prosumer’ (producer and consumer) to describe the supposedly new, supposedly empowered consumer of digital content attests to the excitement felt at the new possibilities for media consumption that digital forms provided. A consensus emerged that the arrival of web-based platforms would fundamentally change the way in which television and cinema were experienced. Among the zeal for these new forms, though, lurked considerable anxiety, particularly for pro-PSB scholars who found that arguments for public broadcasting, especially those based around spectrum scarcity and of broadcasting as a limited public good, were increasingly untenable. The widespread assumption started to be made that as audiences become ‘viewsers’, institutional control over audience experience is lost, and the purpose — and legitimacy — of the PSB slowly evaporates. However, others were more optimistic, noting that the long-term survival of public broadcasting under increasingly unsympathetic political regimes was evidence of the evolutionary strength of PSBs, as Jeanette Steemers argues:
Public service broadcasters have survived to date by reinventing themselves to meet the challenges of new technology, competition and regulatory change. These companies are past and present masters of justifying the grounds for their further existence.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Steemers (2003) ‘Public Service Broadcasting Is Not Dead Yet: Strategies in the 21st Century’ in G. Ferrell Lowe and T. Hujanen (eds) Broadcasting and Convergence: New Articulations of the Public Service Remit (Goteburg: Nordicom), p. 123.
D. Harries (2002) ‘Watching the Internet’ in Harries (ed.) The New Media Book (London: BFI), p. 171.
E. Weissman (2009) ‘Drama Counts: Uncovering Channel 4’s History with Quantitative Research Methods’, New Review of Film and Television Studies, 7:2, p. 191.
M. Buonanno (2009) The Age of Television Experience and Theories [translated by Jennifer Radice] (Bristol: Intellect), p. 69.
J. Ellis (2000) Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty (London and New York: I.B. Tauris), p. 131.
A. Everett (2003) ‘Digitextuality and Click Theory: Theses on Convergence Media in the Digital Age’ in A. Everett and J. T. Caldwell (eds) New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality (London and New York: Routledge), p. 17.
M. Lister, J. Dovey, S. Giddings, I. Grant and K. Kelly (2008) New Media: A Critical Introduction 2nd Edition (London and New York: Routledge), p. 34.
C. Wardle and A. Williams (2010) ‘Beyond User-Generated Content: A Production Study Examining the Ways in Which UGC is Used at the BBC’, Media, Culture and Society, 32:5, pp. 794–795.
Copyright information
© 2014 Hannah Andrews
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrews, H. (2014). New Logics of Convergence: Film through Online Television. In: Television and British Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311177_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311177_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45685-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31117-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)