Skip to main content

Television as Film, Film as Television: Broadcasting Cinema in the 1990s

  • Chapter
Television and British Cinema
  • 142 Accesses

Abstract

By the end of the 1980s, single fictions on television were generally called ‘films’ rather than ‘plays’. Channel 4’s drama policy helped bring about a discursive, conceptual and presentational shift in the way in which single television dramas were conceived. In the 1990s, with a change in Commissioning Editor and a change of job title to ‘Head of Film’, came a change in direction for Channel 4. Whereas previously Film(s) on Four were intended for cinema distribution internationally (and, in some cases, a small-scale domestic distribution), after 1990 Channel 4 films were explicitly destined for theatrical distribution in the UK as well. John Caughie has described the changes occurring in the early 1990s as manifestations of various logics of convergence between British television drama and film. He summarizes them thus:

The £6 million budget to produce twenty films a year becomes £12 million to produce around fifteen. Costs go up and volume comes down; the need to fill a programming strand is replaced by the need to ensure that each product has the quality which will enable it to find its place in the market.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Caughie (2000) Television Drama: Realism, Modernism, and British Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 182.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Genette (1997) Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Gray (2010) Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers and Other Media Paratexts (New York and London: New York University Press), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Ellis (2012) ‘Interstitials: How the “Bits in Between” Define the Programmes’ in P. Grainge (ed.) Ephemeral Media: Transitory Screen Culture from Television to YouTube (London: BFI), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Isaacs (1989) Storm Over 4: A Personal Account (London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Lippard (ed.) (1996) By Angels Driven: The Films of Derek Jarman (Trowbridge: Flicks Books), p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  7. With some important exceptions. See L. Mulvey and J. Sexton (eds) (2007) Experimental British Television (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Andrews (2011) ‘On the Grey Box: Broadcasting Experimental Film and Video on Channel 4’s The Eleventh Hour’, Visual Culture in Britain, 12:2, pp. 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Peake (1999) Derek Jarman (London: Abacus), pp. 304–305.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ellis (1992) Visible Fictions (London: Routledge), pp. 238–239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Wymer (2006) Derek Jarman (Manchester: Manchester University Press) p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quoted in P. Wollen (2000) ‘Derek Jarman’s Blue’, New Left Review, 6, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. O’Pray (1996) Derek Jarman: Dreams of England (London: BFI), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.J. Smith (1993) ‘Blue and the Outer Limits’, Sight and Sound, 3:10, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. LaBelle (1995) ‘The Poetics of Blue’, Coil, 1, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Darke (1993) ‘Blue’, Sight and Sound, 3:10, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Caughie (1996) ‘The Logic of Convergence’ in Hill and McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen (Luton: University of Luton Press) p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Combs (1995) ‘New British Cinema: A Prospect and Six Views’, Film Comment, 31:6, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Hill (2009) ‘British Cinema as National Cinema: Production, Audience and Representation’ in R. Murphy (ed.) The British Cinema Book, 3rd Edition (London: BFI), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Dayan and E. Katz (1992) Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History (Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Feuer (1983) ‘The Concept of Live Television: Ontology as Ideology’ in E. Kaplan (ed.) Regarding Television: Critical Approaches — An Anthology (Los Angeles: American Film Institute), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Scannell (2002) ‘Big Brother as a Television Event’, Television and New Media, 3:3, p. 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Wheatley (2004) ‘The Limits of Television? Natural History Programming and the Transformation of Public Service Broadcasting’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7:3, p. 336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Hannah Andrews

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrews, H. (2014). Television as Film, Film as Television: Broadcasting Cinema in the 1990s. In: Television and British Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311177_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics