Abstract
Over a five-day period in November 2008, a short’ season’ of five films made by Film4 was shown by their parent broadcaster, Channel 4. A promotional advertisement for this season was programmed at various intervals for about a fortnight prior to the first broadcast. The promo is structured in such a way as not only to advertise the season, but tacitly to celebrate Film4. The advertisement is a compilation of extremely short clips taken from various Film4 productions edited together as a montage, with a linking motif of certain parts of the photographic image being pencilled over in black and white using a rotoscoping technique, as though part of a moving storyboard. (See Figure 0.1.)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
N. Carroll (1996) Theorizing the Moving Image (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 1.
A.D. Lotz (2007) ‘If It’s Not TV, What Is It?’ in S. Banet-Weiser, C. Chris and A. Freitas (eds) Cable Visions: Television Beyond Broadcasting (New York and London: New York University Press), p. 100.
V. Porter (1983) ‘The Context of Creativity: Ealing Studios and Hammer Films’ in J. Curran and V. Porter (eds) British Cinema History (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson), p. 180.
J. Caughie (1986) ‘Broadcasting and Cinema 1: Converging Histories’ in C. Barr (ed.) All Our Yesterdays: 90 Years of British Cinema (London: BFI) pp. 189–205.
J. Hill (2010) ‘Revisiting British Film Studies’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 7:2, p. 299.
A. Lovell (1972) ‘The Unknown Cinema of Britain’, Cinema Journal, 11:2, pp. 1–8
J. Petley (1986) ‘The Lost Continent’ in Charles Barr (ed.) All Our Yesterdays: 90 Years of British Cinema (London: BFI), pp. 98–119.
J. Ashby and A. Higson (eds) (2000) British Cinema: Past and Present (Abingdon and New York: Routledge).
A. Higson (2011) Film England: Culturally English Filmmaking Since the 1990s (London and New York: I.B. Tauris).
R. Murphy (ed.) (1997, 2002, 2007) The British Cinema Book (London: BFI).
J. Leggott (2009) Contemporary British Cinema: From Heritage to Horror (London: Wallflower), p. 12
R. Murphy (2000) ‘Introduction’ in Murphy (ed.) British Cinema of the 90s (London: BFI), p. xix.
S. Street (2009) British National Cinema 2nd Edition (London and New York: Routledge), p. 29.
J. Hill (1996) ‘British Television and Film: The Making of a Relationship’ in J. Hill and M. McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen: The Relations between Film and Television (Luton: University of Luton Press), p. 166.
C. Murroni and N. Irvine (1997) ‘The Best Television in the World’, in C. Murroni and N. Irvine (eds) Quality in Broadcasting, (London: Institute for Public Policy Research), p. 12.
J. Corner, S. Harvey and K. Lury (1994) ‘Culture, Quality and Choice: The Re-Regulation of TV 1989–1991’ in S. Hood (ed.) Behind the Screens: The Structure ofBritish Television in the Nineties (London: Lawrence and Wishart), p. 17.
G. Mulgan (1990) ‘Television’s Holy Grail: Seven Types of Quality’ in Mulgan (ed.) Questions of Quality (London: BFI), p. 11.
Peacock Report, quoted in J. McDonnell (1991) Public Service Broadcasting (London and New York: Routledge), p. 98.
S. Harvey (2006) ‘Ofcom’s First Year and Neoliberalism’s Blind Spot: Attacking the Culture of Production’, Screen, 47:1, pp. 99–100.
G. Born (2003) ‘Strategy, Positioning and Projection in Digital Television: Channel Four and the Commercialization of Public Service Broadcasting in the UK’, Media, Culture and Society, 25:6, p. 781.
C. Johnson (2011) Branding Television (London: Routledge 2012), p. 81.
C. Lury (2004) Brands: The Logos of the Cultural Economy (London and New York: Routledge), p. 7.
J. Jacobs (2001) ‘Issues of Judgement and Value in Television Studies’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4:4, p. 433.
J.T. Caldwell (1995) Televisuality: Style Crisis and Authority in American Television (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), p. 12.
R. Nelson (2005) ‘American Quality Television Conference Review’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8:1, p. 119.
J. Feuer (2007) ‘HBO and the Concept of Quality TV’ in J. McCabe and K. Akass (eds) Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond (London and New York: I.B. Tauris), p. 145.
M. McLoone (1996) ‘Boxed In? The Aesthetics of Film and Television’ in J. Hill and M. McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen, p. 81.
R. Nelson (2007) State of Play: Contemporary ‘High-end’ Television Drama (Manchester: Manchester University Press), p. 110.
D.L. Jaramillo (2013) ‘Rescuing Television from the “cinematic”: The Perils of Dismissing Television Style’ in J. Jacobs and S. Peacock (eds) Television Aesthetics and Style (London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney: Bloomsbury), p. 73.
C. Brunsdon (1997) Screen Tastes: Soap Opera to Satellite Dishes (London and New York: Routledge), p. 112.
C. Brunsdon (2012) ‘It’s a Film: Medium Specificity as Textual Gesture in Red Road and The Unloved’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 9:3, p. 459.
M.Z. Newman and E. Levine (2012) Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status (London and New York: Routledge), p. 154.
A. Everett (2003) ‘Digitextuality and Click Theory: Theses on Convergence Media in the Digital Age’ in A. Everett and J.T. Caldwell (eds) New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality (New York and London: Routledge), p. 5.
P. Kramer (1996) ‘The Lure of the Big Picture: Film, Television and Hollywood’ in J. Hill and M. McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen, pp. 9–46.
See also, Ben Singer (1988) ‘Early Home Cinema and the Edison Home Projecting Kinetoscope’, Film History, 2:1, pp. 37–69.
H. Jenkins (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York and London: New York University Press), p. 2.
H. Jenkins (2004) ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7:1, p. 34.
N. Negroponte (1995) Being Digital (London: Hodder and Stoughton), p. 71
M. McLuhan (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London: Routledge).
D. Bell (2009) ‘On the Net: Navigating the World Wide Web’ in G. Creeber and R. Martin (eds) Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media (Maidenhead: Open University Press), p. 35.
S. Keane (2007) CineTech: Film, Convergence and New Media (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 30.
For example, P. Cherchi Usai (2001) The Death of Cinema (London: BFI)
A. Friedberg (2010) ‘The End of Cinema: Multimedia and Technological Change’ in M. Furstenau (ed.) The Film Theory Reader: Debates and Arguments (London: Routledge)
N. Nielssen (2011) ‘Lives of Cinema: Against Its Death’, Screen, 52:3, pp. 307–326
L. Spigel and J. Olsson (eds) Television after TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
D.N. Rodowick (2007) The Virtual Life of Film (Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press), p. 19.
J.D. Bolter and R. Grusin (2009) Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge, MA, and London: The MIT Press), p. 59.
T. Syvertsen (2003) ‘Challenges to Public Television in the Era of Convergence and Commercialization’, Television and New Media, 4:2, p. 160.
J. Bennett (2011) ‘Introduction’ in J. Bennett and N. Strange (eds) Television as Digital Media (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press), p. 1.
Copyright information
© 2014 Hannah Andrews
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrews, H. (2014). Introduction: The Contexts of Convergence. In: Television and British Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311177_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311177_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45685-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31117-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)