Skip to main content

Introduction: The Contexts of Convergence

  • Chapter
Television and British Cinema
  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

Over a five-day period in November 2008, a short’ season’ of five films made by Film4 was shown by their parent broadcaster, Channel 4. A promotional advertisement for this season was programmed at various intervals for about a fortnight prior to the first broadcast. The promo is structured in such a way as not only to advertise the season, but tacitly to celebrate Film4. The advertisement is a compilation of extremely short clips taken from various Film4 productions edited together as a montage, with a linking motif of certain parts of the photographic image being pencilled over in black and white using a rotoscoping technique, as though part of a moving storyboard. (See Figure 0.1.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. N. Carroll (1996) Theorizing the Moving Image (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.D. Lotz (2007) ‘If It’s Not TV, What Is It?’ in S. Banet-Weiser, C. Chris and A. Freitas (eds) Cable Visions: Television Beyond Broadcasting (New York and London: New York University Press), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Porter (1983) ‘The Context of Creativity: Ealing Studios and Hammer Films’ in J. Curran and V. Porter (eds) British Cinema History (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Caughie (1986) ‘Broadcasting and Cinema 1: Converging Histories’ in C. Barr (ed.) All Our Yesterdays: 90 Years of British Cinema (London: BFI) pp. 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hill (2010) ‘Revisiting British Film Studies’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 7:2, p. 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Lovell (1972) ‘The Unknown Cinema of Britain’, Cinema Journal, 11:2, pp. 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Petley (1986) ‘The Lost Continent’ in Charles Barr (ed.) All Our Yesterdays: 90 Years of British Cinema (London: BFI), pp. 98–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Ashby and A. Higson (eds) (2000) British Cinema: Past and Present (Abingdon and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Higson (2011) Film England: Culturally English Filmmaking Since the 1990s (London and New York: I.B. Tauris).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Murphy (ed.) (1997, 2002, 2007) The British Cinema Book (London: BFI).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Leggott (2009) Contemporary British Cinema: From Heritage to Horror (London: Wallflower), p. 12

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Murphy (2000) ‘Introduction’ in Murphy (ed.) British Cinema of the 90s (London: BFI), p. xix.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Street (2009) British National Cinema 2nd Edition (London and New York: Routledge), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Hill (1996) ‘British Television and Film: The Making of a Relationship’ in J. Hill and M. McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen: The Relations between Film and Television (Luton: University of Luton Press), p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Murroni and N. Irvine (1997) ‘The Best Television in the World’, in C. Murroni and N. Irvine (eds) Quality in Broadcasting, (London: Institute for Public Policy Research), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Corner, S. Harvey and K. Lury (1994) ‘Culture, Quality and Choice: The Re-Regulation of TV 1989–1991’ in S. Hood (ed.) Behind the Screens: The Structure ofBritish Television in the Nineties (London: Lawrence and Wishart), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Mulgan (1990) ‘Television’s Holy Grail: Seven Types of Quality’ in Mulgan (ed.) Questions of Quality (London: BFI), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peacock Report, quoted in J. McDonnell (1991) Public Service Broadcasting (London and New York: Routledge), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Harvey (2006) ‘Ofcom’s First Year and Neoliberalism’s Blind Spot: Attacking the Culture of Production’, Screen, 47:1, pp. 99–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Born (2003) ‘Strategy, Positioning and Projection in Digital Television: Channel Four and the Commercialization of Public Service Broadcasting in the UK’, Media, Culture and Society, 25:6, p. 781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Johnson (2011) Branding Television (London: Routledge 2012), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Lury (2004) Brands: The Logos of the Cultural Economy (London and New York: Routledge), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Jacobs (2001) ‘Issues of Judgement and Value in Television Studies’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4:4, p. 433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.T. Caldwell (1995) Televisuality: Style Crisis and Authority in American Television (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Nelson (2005) ‘American Quality Television Conference Review’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8:1, p. 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Feuer (2007) ‘HBO and the Concept of Quality TV’ in J. McCabe and K. Akass (eds) Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond (London and New York: I.B. Tauris), p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. McLoone (1996) ‘Boxed In? The Aesthetics of Film and Television’ in J. Hill and M. McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Nelson (2007) State of Play: Contemporary ‘High-endTelevision Drama (Manchester: Manchester University Press), p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D.L. Jaramillo (2013) ‘Rescuing Television from the “cinematic”: The Perils of Dismissing Television Style’ in J. Jacobs and S. Peacock (eds) Television Aesthetics and Style (London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney: Bloomsbury), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Brunsdon (1997) Screen Tastes: Soap Opera to Satellite Dishes (London and New York: Routledge), p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Brunsdon (2012) ‘It’s a Film: Medium Specificity as Textual Gesture in Red Road and The Unloved’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 9:3, p. 459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M.Z. Newman and E. Levine (2012) Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status (London and New York: Routledge), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Everett (2003) ‘Digitextuality and Click Theory: Theses on Convergence Media in the Digital Age’ in A. Everett and J.T. Caldwell (eds) New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality (New York and London: Routledge), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Kramer (1996) ‘The Lure of the Big Picture: Film, Television and Hollywood’ in J. Hill and M. McLoone (eds) Big Picture, Small Screen, pp. 9–46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See also, Ben Singer (1988) ‘Early Home Cinema and the Edison Home Projecting Kinetoscope’, Film History, 2:1, pp. 37–69.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Jenkins (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York and London: New York University Press), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. Jenkins (2004) ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7:1, p. 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. N. Negroponte (1995) Being Digital (London: Hodder and Stoughton), p. 71

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. McLuhan (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. Bell (2009) ‘On the Net: Navigating the World Wide Web’ in G. Creeber and R. Martin (eds) Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media (Maidenhead: Open University Press), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Keane (2007) CineTech: Film, Convergence and New Media (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  42. For example, P. Cherchi Usai (2001) The Death of Cinema (London: BFI)

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Friedberg (2010) ‘The End of Cinema: Multimedia and Technological Change’ in M. Furstenau (ed.) The Film Theory Reader: Debates and Arguments (London: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  44. N. Nielssen (2011) ‘Lives of Cinema: Against Its Death’, Screen, 52:3, pp. 307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. L. Spigel and J. Olsson (eds) Television after TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  46. D.N. Rodowick (2007) The Virtual Life of Film (Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press), p. 19.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. J.D. Bolter and R. Grusin (2009) Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge, MA, and London: The MIT Press), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  48. T. Syvertsen (2003) ‘Challenges to Public Television in the Era of Convergence and Commercialization’, Television and New Media, 4:2, p. 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Bennett (2011) ‘Introduction’ in J. Bennett and N. Strange (eds) Television as Digital Media (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press), p. 1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Hannah Andrews

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrews, H. (2014). Introduction: The Contexts of Convergence. In: Television and British Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311177_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics