Skip to main content

Spinning a Collaborative Web

Documentary Projects in the Digital Arena

  • Chapter

Abstract

Shirley Clarke’s shift in the 1970s from producing 16mm films to an improvisational video practice in the Chelsea Hotel with her Tee Pee Video Space Troupe should be seen as an early call for a more collaborative theory of authorship and understanding of the documentary project. The use of the Internet for the preproduction of documentary films and the outreach/commentary following their exhibition may be just as interesting, or, perhaps, more historically significant than the documentary materials themselves. Documentary scholars are returning to the history of early video because these predecessors bear striking resemblances to the current digital landscape (Boyle 1997; Coffman 2012; Cohen 2012; Juhasz 2003; Tripp 2012). Media collectives — the Videofreex, Raindance Corporation, Kartemquin Films — forged participatory paths in the late 1960s and early 1970s through handing cameras to their subjects and publishing training manuals and operating instructions on how to record both persuasively and democratically. Whether taking cameras to interview the soon-to-be murdered Black Panther leader Fred Hampton or experimenting with feedback loops and interactive installation projects, these collectives shared equipment, funding resources and apartments to produce a different kind of documentary practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, A. (2011) ‘Meet Chicago’s Interrupters’, The Guardian, August 6, accessed 21 October 2013 at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/aug/06/interrupters-chicago-anti-gang-violence

  • Aufderheide, P. (2006) ‘Making Your Documentary Matter Report’, accessed 21 October 2013 at: http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/making-your-media-matter/conference/rap-reports/making-your-documentary-matter-2006-report

  • Boyle, D. (1997) Subject to Change: Guerilla Television Revisited (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, E. (2009) ‘Documentary and Collaboration: Placing the Camera in the Community’, Journal of Film and Video, 61(1), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, E. (2012) ‘“VT is not TV”: The Raindance Reunion in the Digital Age’, Journal of Film and Video, 64(1-2), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, T. (2012) ‘After the New Cinema: Shirley Clarke’s Video Work as Process and Document’, Journal of Film and Video, 64(1-2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason, D.L. (1984) ‘The New Journalism and the Image World: Two Modes of Organizing Experience’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigley, K. (2011) Mary Kay Inspiring Stories, (Dreaming Tree Productions, Chicago, IL), accessed 21 October 2013 at: http://marykayinspiringstories.com/

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, J. (1999) ‘Radical Attractions: The Uprising of ′34’, Wide Angle, 21(2), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, J. (2007a) ‘Documentary Radicality’, Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 16(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, J. (2007b) ‘The Production of Outrage: The Iraq War and the Radical Documentary Tradition’, Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media, 48(2), 36–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, I. and Malitsky J. (2010) ‘Actor-Network Theory and Documentary Studies’, Studies in Documentary Film, 4(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006a) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006b) ‘Quentin Tarantino’s Star Wars?: Digital Cinema, Media Convergence, and Participatory Culture, in M.G. Durham and D. Kellner (eds.) Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 549–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz, A. (2003) ‘No Woman is an Object: Realizing the Feminist Collaborative Video’, Camera Obscura, 18(3), 70–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kael, P. (1963) ‘Circles and Squares’, Film Quarterly, 16(3), 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korot, B., Gershuny, P., Schneider, I., Shamberg, M. et al (1970) Radical Software, accessed 21 October at: http://www.radicalsoftware.org/e/index.html

  • Latour, B. (1997) ‘On Actor Network theory: A Few Clarifications’, Center for Social Theory and Technology, Keele University, 1–4, accessed 21 October 2013 at: http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9801/msg00019.html

  • Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (2004) ‘“Celebrating the Story the Way it is”: Cultural Studies, Corporate Media and the Contested Utility of Fandom’, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 18(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (1991) Representing Reality (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (2013) ‘Projects’, Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, J. (2000) Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarris, A. (1962) ‘Notes on the Auteur Theory in 1962’, in L. Braudy and M. Cohen (eds.) Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 561–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sole-Smith, V. (2012) ‘The Pink Pyramid Scheme’, The Investigative Fund, July 16, accessed 21 October 2013 at: http://www.theinvestigativefund.org/investigations/corporateaccountability/1659/the_pink_pyramid_scheme?page=entire

  • Stoney, G., Helfand, J. and Rostock, S. (1995) The Uprising of ′34 (Documentary Educational Resources: Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S. (2012) ‘From TVTV to YouTube: A Genealogy of Participatory Practices in Video’, Journal of Film and Video, 64(1-2), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1998) ‘Melodrama Revised’, in N. Browne (ed.) Refiguring American Film Genres: History and Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 42–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Elizabeth Coffman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coffman, E. (2014). Spinning a Collaborative Web. In: Nash, K., Hight, C., Summerhayes, C. (eds) New Documentary Ecologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310491_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics