Abstract
Shirley Brice Heath’s work in the Carolina Piedmonts resulted in an ethnographic study covering a span of ten years from 1969 to 1978, in which she chronicled language use in three communities, Roadville, Trackton and Maintown. Her rich accounting of the literate practices of three culturally diverse groups living in close proximity to one another was groundbreaking in redefining literacy.
After typing out the stories just as they were told into the tape recorder, some teachers found that a few students would reject their oral version in written form. (Heath, 1983: 304)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, A. B., Teale, W. B. and Estrada E. (1980). Low income children’s preschool literacy experiences: Some naturalistic observations. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 2: 59–65.
Ashton-Warner, S. (1963). Teacher. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Barton, D. and Hamilton M. (2005). Literacy, reification, and the dynamics of social interaction. In D. Barton and K. Tusting (eds), Beyond communities of practice: language, power and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
Baynham, M. (2004). Ethnographies of literacy: introduction. Language and Education, 18: 285–90.
Baynham, M. and Prinsloo, M. (2009). The future of literacy studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bomer, R. (2007). When writing leads: an activity-theoretic account of the literate activity of first-graders stronger at writing than reading. In D. W. Rowe, R. T. Jimenez, D. L. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, Y. Kim, K. M. Leander and V. J. Risko (eds), 56th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 151–63). Oak Creek, Wis.: National Reading Conference.
Brandt, D. and Clinton, K. (2002). Limits of the local: expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34: 337–56.
Carrington, V. (2012). ‘There’s no going back’. Roxie’s IPhone®: an object ethnography. Language and Literacy, 14(2): 27–40.
Collins, J. and Blot, R. K. (2003). Literacy and literacies: texts, power, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook-Gumperz, J. (2006). The social construction of literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D. (1998). Students as researchers of culture and language in their own communities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Hall, M. A. (1970). Teaching reading as a language experience. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill.
Hamilton, M. (2001). Privileged literacies: policy, institutional process and the life of the IALS. Language and Education, 15: 178–96.
Heath, S. B. (1982a). Protean shapes in literacy events: ever shifting oral and literate traditions. In D. Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language: exploring literacy and orality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Heath, S. B. (1982b). What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and at school. Language and Society, 11: 49–76.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, S. B. (2009). What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and at school. In A. Duranti (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader (pp. 343–63). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hymes, D. (1977/1994). Toward ethnographies of communication. In J. Maybin (ed.), Language and literacy in social practice. Clevedon, UK: The Open University.
Kell, C. (2006). Crossing the margins: literacy, semiotics and the recontextualization of meanings. In K. Pahl and J. Rowsell (eds), Travel notes from the new literacy studies: instances ofpractice (pp. 147–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: University Press.
Leander, K. M. and Lovvorn, J. F. (2006). Literacy networks: following the circulation of texts, bodies, and objects in the schooling and online gaming of one youth. Cognition and Instruction, 24: 291–340.
Lenters, K. (2012). Enhancing and displacing literacy practices: examining publishing in a writer’s workshop. Language and Literacy: a Canadian E-Journal, 14: 125–51.
Lenters, K. and McTavish, M. (2013). Student planners in-school and out-of-school: who’s managing whom? Literacy, 47(2).
Lewis, C., Enciso, P. and Moje, E. B. (eds) (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Michaels, S. and Sohmer, R. (2000). Narratives and inscriptions: cultural tools, power and powerful sense-making. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (eds), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
Nichols, S. (2006). From boardroom to classroom: teaching a globalised discourse on thinking through internet texts and teaching practices. In K. Pahl and J. Rowsell (eds), Travel notes from the new literacy studies: instances of practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Omerod, F. and Ivanic, R. (2000). Texts in practices: interpreting the physical characteristics of children’s project work. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton and R. Ivanic (eds), Situated literacies: reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
Pahl, K. and Rowsell, J. (2006). Travel notes from the new literacy studies. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Pahl, K. and Rowsell J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: every object tells a story. New York: Teachers College Press.
Reder, S. and Davila, E. (2005). Context and literacy practices. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25: 170–87.
Rogers, R. (2007). A critical discourse analysis of family literacy practices: power in and out of print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rowe, D. W. and Leander, K. M. (2005). Analyzing the production of third space in classroom literacy events. In B. Maloch, J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks and J. Worthy (eds), 54th Yearbook of the NRC. Oak Creek, Wis.: National Reading Conference.
Street, B. V. (1993). Introduction: the new literacy studies. In B. V. Street (ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. V. (2003). What’s ‘new’ in the new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5: 1–14.
Street, B. V. and Lefstein, A. (2007). Literacy: an advanced resource book. New York: Routledge.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Kimberly Lenters
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lenters, K. (2014). Reassembling the Literacy Event in Shirley Brice Heath’s Ways with Words. In: Prinsloo, M., Stroud, C. (eds) Educating for Language and Literacy Diversity. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309860_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309860_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-30984-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30986-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)